Yan Shijiao, Gan Yong, Jiang Nan, Wang Rixing, Chen Yunqiang, Luo Zhiqian, Zong Qiao, Chen Song, Lv Chuanzhu
School of Public Health, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Key Laboratory of Emergency and Trauma of Ministry of Education, Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan, China.
Crit Care. 2020 Feb 22;24(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s13054-020-2773-2.
To quantitatively summarize the available epidemiological evidence on the survival rate of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).
We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases, and the references of retrieved articles were manually reviewed to identify studies reporting the outcome of OHCA patients who received CPR. The overall incidence and outcome of OHCA were assessed using a random-effects meta-analysis.
A total of 141 eligible studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was 29.7% (95% CI 27.6-31.7%), the rate of survival to hospital admission was 22.0% (95% CI 20.7-23.4%), the rate of survival to hospital discharge was 8.8% (95% CI 8.2-9.4%), the pooled 1-month survival rate was 10.7% (95% CI 9.1-13.3%), and the 1-year survival rate was 7.7% (95% CI 5.8-9.5%). Subgroup analysis showed that survival to hospital discharge was more likely among OHCA patients whose cardiac arrest was witnessed by a bystander or emergency medical services (EMS) (10.5%; 95% CI 9.2-11.7%), who received bystander CPR (11.3%, 95% CI 9.3-13.2%), and who were living in Europe and North America (Europe 11.7%; 95% CI 10.5-13.0%; North America: 7.7%; 95% CI 6.9-8.6%). The survival to discharge (8.6% in 1976-1999 vs. 9.9% in 2010-2019), 1-month survival (8.0% in 2000-2009 vs. 13.3% in 2010-2019), and 1-year survival (8.0% in 2000-2009 vs. 13.3% in 2010-2019) rates of OHCA patients who underwent CPR significantly increased throughout the study period. The Egger's test did not indicate evidence of publication bias for the outcomes of OHCA patients who underwent CPR.
The global survival rate of OHCA patients who received CPR has increased in the past 40 years. A higher survival rate post-OHCA is more likely among patients who receive bystander CPR and who live in Western countries.
定量总结关于接受心肺复苏(CPR)的院外心脏骤停(OHCA)患者生存率的现有流行病学证据。
我们系统检索了PubMed、Embase和Web of Science数据库,并人工查阅检索文章的参考文献,以确定报告接受CPR的OHCA患者结局的研究。使用随机效应荟萃分析评估OHCA的总体发病率和结局。
本荟萃分析共纳入141项符合条件的研究。自主循环恢复(ROSC)的合并发生率为29.7%(95%CI 27.6 - 31.7%),入院生存率为22.0%(95%CI 20.7 - 23.4%),出院生存率为8.8%(95%CI 8.2 - 9.4%),1个月合并生存率为10.7%(95%CI 9.1 - 13.3%),1年生存率为7.7%(95%CI 5.8 - 9.5%)。亚组分析表明,心脏骤停由旁观者或紧急医疗服务(EMS)见证的OHCA患者、接受旁观者CPR的患者以及居住在欧洲和北美的患者出院生存的可能性更高(旁观者或EMS见证:10.5%;95%CI 9.2 - 11.7%;接受旁观者CPR:11.3%,95%CI 9.3 - 13.2%;欧洲:11.7%;95%CI 10.5 - 13.0%;北美:7.7%;95%CI 6.9 - 8.6%)。在整个研究期间,接受CPR的OHCA患者的出院生存率(1976 - 1999年为8.6%,2010 - 2019年为9.9%)、1个月生存率(2000 - 2009年为8.0%,2010 - 2019年为13.3%)和1年生存率(2000 - 2009年为8.0%,2010 - 2019年为13.3%)显著提高。Egger检验未表明接受CPR的OHCA患者结局存在发表偏倚的证据。
在过去40年中,接受CPR的OHCA患者的全球生存率有所提高。接受旁观者CPR的患者以及居住在西方国家的患者OHCA后生存率更高。