Suppr超能文献

院外心脏骤停生存的预测因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Predictors of survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Sasson Comilla, Rogers Mary A M, Dahl Jason, Kellermann Arthur L

机构信息

Departments of Emergency Medicine and Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2010 Jan;3(1):63-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.889576. Epub 2009 Nov 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Prior studies have identified key predictors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but differences exist in the magnitude of these findings. In this meta-analysis, we evaluated the strength of associations between OHCA and key factors (event witnessed by a bystander or emergency medical services [EMS], provision of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR], initial cardiac rhythm, or the return of spontaneous circulation). We also examined trends in OHCA survival over time.

METHODS AND RESULTS

An electronic search of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane DSR, DARE, ACP Journal Club, and CCTR was conducted (January 1, 1950 to August 21, 2008) for studies reporting OHCA of presumed cardiac etiology in adults. Data were extracted from 79 studies involving 142 740 patients. The pooled survival rate to hospital admission was 23.8% (95% CI, 21.1 to 26.6) and to hospital discharge was 7.6% (95% CI, 6.7 to 8.4). Stratified by baseline rates, survival to hospital discharge was more likely among those: witnessed by a bystander (6.4% to 13.5%), witnessed by EMS (4.9% to 18.2%), who received bystander CPR (3.9% to 16.1%), were found in ventricular fibrillation/ventricular tachycardia (14.8% to 23.0%), or achieved return of spontaneous circulation (15.5% to 33.6%). Although 53% (95% CI, 45.0% to 59.9%) of events were witnessed by a bystander, only 32% (95% CI, 26.7% to 37.8%) received bystander CPR. The number needed to treat to save 1 life ranged from 16 to 23 for EMS-witnessed arrests, 17 to 71 for bystander-witnessed, and 24 to 36 for those receiving bystander CPR, depending on baseline survival rates. The aggregate survival rate of OHCA (7.6%) has not significantly changed in almost 3 decades.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall survival from OHCA has been stable for almost 30 years, as have the strong associations between key predictors and survival. Because most OHCA events are witnessed, efforts to improve survival should focus on prompt delivery of interventions of known effectiveness by those who witness the event.

摘要

背景

先前的研究已确定院外心脏骤停(OHCA)的关键预测因素,但这些研究结果的程度存在差异。在这项荟萃分析中,我们评估了OHCA与关键因素(旁观者或紧急医疗服务[EMS]目睹事件、旁观者进行心肺复苏[CPR]、初始心律或自主循环恢复)之间关联的强度。我们还研究了OHCA生存率随时间的变化趋势。

方法与结果

对PubMed、EMBASE、科学网、CINAHL、Cochrane系统评价数据库、DARE、美国内科医师学会杂志俱乐部和CCTR进行电子检索(1950年1月1日至2008年8月21日),以查找报告成人疑似心脏病因的OHCA的研究。从79项涉及142740例患者的研究中提取数据。入院时的合并生存率为23.8%(95%CI,21.1%至26.6%),出院时为7.6%(95%CI,6.7%至8.4%)。按基线率分层,出院生存率在以下人群中更高:由旁观者目睹(6.4%至13.5%)、由EMS目睹(4.9%至18.2%)、接受旁观者CPR(3.9%至16.1%)、初始心律为心室颤动/室性心动过速(14.8%至23.0%)或实现自主循环恢复(15.5%至33.6%)。尽管53%(95%CI,45.0%至59.9%)的事件由旁观者目睹,但只有32%(95%CI,26.7%至37.8%)接受了旁观者CPR。根据基线生存率,挽救1条生命所需的治疗人数在EMS目睹的心脏骤停中为16至23人,旁观者目睹的为17至71人,接受旁观者CPR的为24至36人。OHCA的总体生存率(7.6%)在近30年中没有显著变化。

结论

OHCA的总体生存率在近30年中一直稳定,关键预测因素与生存率之间的强关联也是如此。由于大多数OHCA事件有旁观者目睹,提高生存率的努力应集中于让目睹事件的人迅速提供已知有效的干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验