Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, Bessemer Road, London, SE5 9PJ, UK.
Trials. 2020 Feb 22;21(1):215. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4129-2.
Recruitment and retention in clinical trials remains an important challenge, particularly in the context of advanced disease. It is important to understand what affects retention to improve trial quality, minimise attrition and reduce missing data. We conducted a qualitative study embedded within a randomised feasibility trial and explored what influenced people to take part and remain in the trial.
We conducted a qualitative study embedded within a double-blind randomised trial (BETTER-B[Feasibility]: BETter TreatmEnts for Refractory Breathlessness) designed using a person-centred approach. Participants with cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), interstitial lung disease (ILD), or chronic heart failure (CHF), with a modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale grade of 3/4 were recruited from three UK sites. A convenience subsample completed qualitative interviews after the trial. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. Results were considered in relation to the core elements of person-centred care and our model of the person-centred trial.
In the feasibility trial 409 people were screened for eligibility, and 64 were randomised. No participant was lost to follow-up. Twenty-two participants took part in a qualitative interview. Eleven had a diagnosis of COPD, 8 ILD, 2 CHF and 1 lung cancer. The participants' median age was 71 years (range 56-84). Sixteen were male. Twenty had completed the trial, and two withdrew due to adverse effects. The relationship between patient and professional, potential for benefit, trial processes and the intervention all influenced the decision to participate in the trial. The relationship with the research team and continuity, perceived benefit, and aspects relating to trial processes and the intervention influenced the decision to remain in the trial.
In this feasibility trial recruitment targets were met, attrition levels were low, and aspects of the person-centred approach were viewed positively by trial participants. Prioritisation of the relationship between the patient and professional; person-centred processes, including home visits, assistance with questionnaires, and involvement of the carer; and enabling people to participate by having processes in line with individual capabilities appear to support recruitment and retention in clinical trials in advanced disease. We recommend the integration of a person-centred approach in all clinical trials.
ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN32236160. Registered on 13 June 2016.
在临床试验中,招募和保留参与者仍然是一个重要的挑战,尤其是在晚期疾病的情况下。了解哪些因素会影响保留率对于提高试验质量、最大限度地减少人员流失和减少缺失数据至关重要。我们进行了一项嵌入随机可行性试验的定性研究,探讨了影响人们参与并留在试验中的因素。
我们进行了一项嵌入双盲随机试验(BETTER-B[可行性]:治疗难治性呼吸困难的更好方法)的定性研究,该试验采用以患者为中心的方法设计。参与者为患有癌症、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)、间质性肺疾病(ILD)或慢性心力衰竭(CHF)的患者,改良的医学研究理事会呼吸困难量表等级为 3/4,从三个英国地点招募。一个方便的子样本在试验后完成了定性访谈。使用主题分析方法对访谈进行分析。结果与以患者为中心护理的核心要素和我们的以患者为中心试验模型相关联。
在可行性试验中,有 409 人接受了资格筛选,有 64 人被随机分配。没有参与者失访。22 名参与者参加了定性访谈。11 人患有 COPD,8 人患有 ILD,2 人患有 CHF,1 人患有肺癌。参与者的中位年龄为 71 岁(范围 56-84 岁)。16 名男性。20 人完成了试验,2 人因不良反应而退出。患者与专业人员之间的关系、潜在获益、试验过程和干预措施都影响了参与试验的决定。与研究团队的关系和连续性、感知获益,以及与试验过程和干预措施相关的方面都影响了留在试验中的决定。
在这项可行性试验中,招募目标得以实现,失访率较低,以患者为中心方法的各个方面都得到了试验参与者的积极评价。优先考虑患者与专业人员之间的关系;以患者为中心的过程,包括家访、协助填写问卷和照顾者的参与;并通过使过程符合个人能力来使人们能够参与,这些似乎都支持了晚期疾病临床试验的招募和保留。我们建议在所有临床试验中纳入以患者为中心的方法。
ISRCTN 注册表,ISRCTN32236160。于 2016 年 6 月 13 日注册。