• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

确定临床试验中有效保留策略的研究重点。

Identifying research priorities for effective retention strategies in clinical trials.

作者信息

Kearney Anna, Daykin Anne, Shaw Alison R G, Lane Athene J, Blazeby Jane M, Clarke Mike, Williamson Paula, Gamble Carrol

机构信息

North West Hub for Trials Methodology Research/Clinical Trial Research Centre, Biostatistics, University of Liverpool, Institute of Child Health, Alder Hey NHS Trust, Liverpool, L12 2AP, UK.

ConDuCT-II Hub for Trials Methodology Research, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, 39 Whatley Road, Bristol, BS8 2PS, UK.

出版信息

Trials. 2017 Aug 31;18(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2132-z.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-017-2132-z
PMID:28859674
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5580283/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The failure to retain patients or collect primary-outcome data is a common challenge for trials and reduces the statistical power and potentially introduces bias into the analysis. Identifying strategies to minimise missing data was the second highest methodological research priority in a Delphi survey of the Directors of UK Clinical Trial Units (CTUs) and is important to minimise waste in research. Our aim was to assess the current retention practices within the UK and priorities for future research to evaluate the effectiveness of strategies to reduce attrition.

METHODS

Seventy-five chief investigators of NIHR Health Technology Assessment (HTA)-funded trials starting between 2009 and 2012 were surveyed to elicit their awareness about causes of missing data within their trial and recommended practices for improving retention. Forty-seven CTUs registered within the UKCRC network were surveyed separately to identify approaches and strategies being used to mitigate missing data across trials. Responses from the current practice surveys were used to inform a subsequent two-round Delphi survey with registered CTUs. A consensus list of retention research strategies was produced and ranked by priority.

RESULTS

Fifty out of seventy-five (67%) chief investigators and 33/47 (70%) registered CTUs completed the current practice surveys. Seventy-eight percent of trialists were aware of retention challenges and implemented strategies at trial design. Patient-initiated withdrawal was the most common cause of missing data. Registered CTUs routinely used newsletters, timeline of participant visits, and telephone reminders to mitigate missing data. Whilst 36 out of 59 strategies presented had been formally or informally evaluated, some frequently used strategies, such as site initiation training, have had no research to inform practice. Thirty-five registered CTUs (74%) participated in the Delphi survey. Research into the effectiveness of site initiation training, frequency of patient contact during a trial, the use of routinely collected data, the frequency and timing of reminders, triggered site training and the time needed to complete questionnaires was deemed critical. Research into the effectiveness of Christmas cards for site staff was not of critical importance.

CONCLUSION

The surveys of current practices demonstrates that a variety of strategies are being used to mitigate missing data but with little evidence to support their use. Six retention strategies were deemed critically important within the Delphi survey and should be a primary focus of future retention research.

摘要

背景

在试验中,患者失访或无法收集主要结局数据是一个常见的挑战,这会降低统计效力,并可能在分析中引入偏差。在对英国临床试验单位(CTU)负责人进行的德尔菲调查中,确定将缺失数据降至最低的策略是第二高的方法学研究重点,对于减少研究浪费非常重要。我们的目的是评估英国目前的保留做法以及未来研究的重点,以评估减少损耗策略的有效性。

方法

对2009年至2012年期间启动的75项由英国国家卫生研究院健康技术评估(HTA)资助的试验的首席研究员进行了调查,以了解他们对试验中数据缺失原因的认识以及提高保留率的推荐做法。对在英国临床研究协作网(UKCRC)网络中注册的47个CTU分别进行了调查,以确定用于减少各试验中缺失数据的方法和策略。当前实践调查的结果被用于为随后对注册CTU进行的两轮德尔菲调查提供信息。制定了一份保留研究策略的共识清单,并按优先级排序。

结果

75名首席研究员中有50名(67%)和47个注册CTU中的33个(70%)完成了当前实践调查。78%的试验者意识到保留方面的挑战,并在试验设计时实施了策略。患者主动退出是数据缺失最常见的原因。注册CTU通常使用时事通讯、参与者访视时间表和电话提醒来减少缺失数据。虽然所提出的59项策略中有36项已得到正式或非正式评估,但一些常用策略,如机构启动培训,尚无研究为实践提供参考。35个注册CTU(74%)参与了德尔菲调查。对机构启动培训的有效性、试验期间与患者联系的频率、常规收集数据的使用、提醒的频率和时间、触发式机构培训以及完成问卷所需时间的研究被认为至关重要。对给机构工作人员的圣诞贺卡有效性的研究并非至关重要。

结论

当前实践调查表明,正在使用各种策略来减少缺失数据,但几乎没有证据支持这些策略的使用。在德尔菲调查中,六项保留策略被认为至关重要,应成为未来保留研究的主要重点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ed1/5580283/beca15f5b7db/13063_2017_2132_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ed1/5580283/c4e65ac69d90/13063_2017_2132_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ed1/5580283/beca15f5b7db/13063_2017_2132_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ed1/5580283/c4e65ac69d90/13063_2017_2132_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5ed1/5580283/beca15f5b7db/13063_2017_2132_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Identifying research priorities for effective retention strategies in clinical trials.确定临床试验中有效保留策略的研究重点。
Trials. 2017 Aug 31;18(1):406. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2132-z.
2
The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise.试验方法学研究议程:优先事项设定活动的结果
Trials. 2014 Jan 23;15:32. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-32.
3
Using digital tools in the recruitment and retention in randomised controlled trials: survey of UK Clinical Trial Units and a qualitative study.在随机对照试验中使用数字工具进行招募和保留:对英国临床试验单位的调查和定性研究。
Trials. 2020 Apr 3;21(1):304. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04234-0.
4
What are the main inefficiencies in trial conduct: a survey of UKCRC registered clinical trials units in the UK.试验实施中的主要低效因素有哪些:对英国UKCRC注册的临床试验单位的一项调查。
Trials. 2018 Jan 8;19(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2378-5.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
UK publicly funded Clinical Trials Units supported a controlled access approach to share individual participant data but highlighted concerns.英国由公共资金资助的临床试验单位支持采用控制访问的方法来共享个体参与者数据,但也强调了一些担忧。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;70:17-25. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.07.002. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
7
Undertaking Studies Within A Trial to evaluate recruitment and retention strategies for randomised controlled trials: lessons learnt from the PROMETHEUS research programme.在一项评估随机对照试验招募和保留策略的试验中进行研究:从 PROMETHEUS 研究计划中吸取的经验教训。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jan;28(2):1-114. doi: 10.3310/HTQW3107.
8
A new trial monitoring plan (TMP) template for clinical trials: output from a Delphi process.一种新的临床试验监测计划(TMP)模板:德尔菲流程的输出结果。
Trials. 2024 Nov 9;25(1):748. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08601-z.
9
Assessing methods to specify the target difference for a randomised controlled trial: DELTA (Difference ELicitation in TriAls) review.评估指定随机对照试验目标差值的方法:DELTA(试验中差值确定)综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 May;18(28):v-vi, 1-175. doi: 10.3310/hta18280.
10
Reducing attrition within clinical trials: The communication of retention and withdrawal within patient information leaflets.减少临床试验中的脱落率:在患者知情同意书中沟通保留和退出情况。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 31;13(10):e0204886. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204886. eCollection 2018.

引用本文的文献

1
Secure care hospital evaluation of manualised interpersonal art-psychotherapy (SCHEMA): A randomised controlled trial protocol.安全护理医院对手动人际艺术心理治疗的评估(SCHEMA):一项随机对照试验方案。
NIHR Open Res. 2025 Mar 7;5:21. doi: 10.3310/nihropenres.13801.1. eCollection 2025.
2
Retention strategies are routinely communicated to potential trial participants but often differ from what was planned in the trial protocol: an analysis of adult participant information leaflets and their corresponding protocols.保留策略通常会传达给潜在的试验参与者,但往往与试验方案中计划的内容不同:对成年参与者信息传单及其相应方案的分析。
Trials. 2024 Jun 10;25(1):372. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08194-7.
3

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review of training programmes for recruiters to randomised controlled trials.对招募人员参与随机对照试验的培训项目的系统评价。
Trials. 2015 Sep 28;16:432. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0908-6.
2
Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities.改善临床试验受试者招募与留存的干预措施:一项评估当前实践及未来优先事项的调查与研讨会
Trials. 2014 Oct 16;15:399. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-399.
3
The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise.
Collaborative care model versus usual care for the management of musculoskeletal and co-existing mental health conditions: a randomised feasibility mixed-methods study.
协作式护理模式与常规护理在管理肌肉骨骼和并存精神健康状况方面的比较:一项随机可行性混合方法研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Feb 21;14(2):e079707. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079707.
4
How do trial teams plan for retention during the design stage of the trial? A scoping review.试验团队如何在试验设计阶段规划保留率?范围综述。
Trials. 2023 Dec 4;24(1):784. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07775-2.
5
Establishing Requirements for Technology to Support Clinical Trial Retention: Systematic Scoping Review and Analysis Using Self-determination Theory.确立支持临床试验保留的技术要求:使用自主决定理论的系统范围界定回顾和分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Apr 13;25:e38159. doi: 10.2196/38159.
6
How do trial teams plan for retention during the design stage of the trial? A scoping review protocol.试验团队如何在试验设计阶段规划保留率?一个范围综述方案。
Trials. 2022 Nov 17;23(1):944. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06866-w.
7
Electronic Health Record-Based Recruitment and Retention and Mobile Health App Usage: Multisite Cohort Study.基于电子健康记录的招募和保留以及移动健康应用程序的使用:多地点队列研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Jun 10;24(6):e34191. doi: 10.2196/34191.
8
How much is the lack of retention evidence costing trial teams in Ireland and the UK?爱尔兰和英国的审判团队因缺乏保留证据而损失了多少钱?
Trials. 2022 May 12;23(1):396. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06223-x.
9
Bah humbug! Association between sending Christmas cards to trial participants and trial retention: randomised study within a trial conducted simultaneously across eight host trials.巴哈嗡嗡!给试验参与者寄圣诞贺卡与试验保留率之间的关联:在同时进行的八项宿主试验中进行的一项试验内随机研究。
BMJ. 2021 Dec 14;375:e067742. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-067742.
10
Developing an online, searchable database to systematically map and organise current literature on retention research (ORRCA2).开发一个在线的、可搜索的数据库,以系统地绘制和组织目前关于保留研究的文献(ORRCA2)。
Clin Trials. 2022 Feb;19(1):71-80. doi: 10.1177/17407745211053803. Epub 2021 Oct 24.
试验方法学研究议程:优先事项设定活动的结果
Trials. 2014 Jan 23;15:32. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-32.
4
Increasing value and reducing waste: addressing inaccessible research.提高价值,减少浪费:解决研究的不可获取性问题。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):257-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62296-5. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
5
Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research.减少生物医学研究中不完整或无法使用的报告所造成的浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 18;383(9913):267-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62228-X. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
6
Increasing value and reducing waste in biomedical research regulation and management.提高生物医学研究监管和管理的价值并减少浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):176-85. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62297-7. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
7
Increasing value and reducing waste in research design, conduct, and analysis.提高研究设计、实施和分析的价值并减少浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):166-75. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62227-8. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
8
How to increase value and reduce waste when research priorities are set.如何在设定研究重点时增加价值和减少浪费。
Lancet. 2014 Jan 11;383(9912):156-65. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62229-1. Epub 2014 Jan 8.
9
Communication skills training for breast cancer teams talking about trials.针对乳腺癌团队进行试验相关沟通技巧的培训。
Breast. 2014 Apr;23(2):193-7. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2013.11.009. Epub 2013 Dec 15.
10
Strategies to improve retention in randomised trials.提高随机试验中保留率的策略。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Dec 3(12):MR000032. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000032.pub2.