• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机对照试验比较腹腔镜结肠切除术时低气压与标准气压气腹:PAROS 试验。

Randomized trial comparing low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic colectomy: PAROS trial.

机构信息

Department of digestive Surgery, Colorectal Unit, Bordeaux University Hospital, 1 Avenue de Magellan, Pessac, 33600, France.

Department of Anesthesia ans Critical Care, Bordeaux University Hospital, 1 Avenue de Magellan, Pessac, 33600, France.

出版信息

Trials. 2020 Feb 22;21(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4140-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-020-4140-7
PMID:32087762
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7036186/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopy, by its minimally invasive nature, has revolutionized digestive and particularly colorectal surgery by decreasing post-operative pain, morbidity, and length of hospital stay. In this trial, we aim to assess whether low pressure in laparoscopic colonic surgery (7 mm Hg instead of 12 mm Hg) could further reduce pain, analgesic consumption, and morbidity, resulting in a shorter hospital stay.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The PAROS trial is a phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. We aim to recruit 138 patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy. Participants will be randomly assigned to either a low-pressure group (7 mm Hg) or a standard-pressure group (12 mm Hg). The primary outcome will be a comparison of length of hospital stay between the two groups. Secondary outcomes will compare post-operative pain, consumption of analgesics, morbidity within 30 days, technical and oncological quality of the surgical procedure, time to passage of flatus and stool, and ambulation. All adverse events will be recorded. Analysis will be performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This research received the approval from the Committee for the Protection of Persons and was the subject of information to the ANSM. This search is saved in the ID-RCB database under registration number 2018-A03028-47. This research is retrospectively registered January 23, 2019, at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ed under the name "LaPAroscopic Low pRessure cOlorectal Surgery (PAROS)". This trial is ongoing.

摘要

背景

腹腔镜技术通过其微创特性,降低了术后疼痛、发病率和住院时间,从而彻底改变了消化科和特别是结直肠外科的手术方式。在本试验中,我们旨在评估腹腔镜结肠手术中的低压力(7mmHg 而非 12mmHg)是否能进一步减轻疼痛、减少镇痛药的使用和发病率,从而缩短住院时间。

方法与分析

PAROS 试验是一项 III 期、双盲、随机对照试验。我们计划招募 138 例接受腹腔镜结肠切除术的患者。参与者将被随机分配到低压力组(7mmHg)或标准压力组(12mmHg)。主要结局将是比较两组患者的住院时间。次要结局将比较术后疼痛、镇痛药的使用、30 天内的发病率、手术的技术和肿瘤学质量、排气和排便时间以及活动能力。所有不良事件都将被记录。分析将基于意向治疗进行。

试验注册

这项研究得到了保护人员委员会的批准,并向 ANSM 进行了信息报备。这项研究在 ID-RCB 数据库中以注册号 2018-A03028-47 进行了保存。这项研究于 2019 年 1 月 23 日在 http://clinicaltrials.gov/ed 以“LaPAroscopic Low pRessure cOlorectal Surgery (PAROS)”的名称进行了回顾性注册。该试验正在进行中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f57d/7036186/b317dd15368b/13063_2020_4140_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f57d/7036186/b7f8aa736e61/13063_2020_4140_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f57d/7036186/b317dd15368b/13063_2020_4140_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f57d/7036186/b7f8aa736e61/13063_2020_4140_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f57d/7036186/b317dd15368b/13063_2020_4140_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Randomized trial comparing low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic colectomy: PAROS trial.随机对照试验比较腹腔镜结肠切除术时低气压与标准气压气腹:PAROS 试验。
Trials. 2020 Feb 22;21(1):216. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-4140-7.
2
An individualised versus a conventional pneumoperitoneum pressure strategy during colorectal laparoscopic surgery: rationale and study protocol for a multicentre randomised clinical study.结直肠腹腔镜手术中个体化与传统气腹压力策略:一项多中心随机临床研究的原理与研究方案
Trials. 2019 Apr 3;20(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3255-1.
3
The effect of low- versus normal-pressure pneumoperitoneum during laparoscopic colorectal surgery on the early quality of recovery with perioperative care according to the enhanced recovery principles (RECOVER): study protocol for a randomized controlled study.腹腔镜结直肠手术中低气压与正常气压气腹对基于加速康复原则的围手术期护理的早期康复质量的影响(RECOVER):一项随机对照研究的研究方案。
Trials. 2020 Jun 17;21(1):541. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04496-8.
4
Low-pressure versus standard pressure laparoscopic colorectal surgery (PAROS trial): a phase III randomized controlled trial.低压与标准气压腹腔镜结直肠手术(PAROS 试验):一项 III 期随机对照试验。
Br J Surg. 2021 Aug 19;108(8):998-1005. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab069.
5
Transversus abdominis plane block versus perioperative intravenous lidocaine versus patient-controlled intravenous morphine for postoperative pain control after laparoscopic colorectal surgery: study protocol for a prospective, randomized, double-blind controlled clinical trial.腹腔镜结直肠手术后腹横肌平面阻滞与围手术期静脉注射利多卡因及患者自控静脉注射吗啡用于术后疼痛控制的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、双盲对照临床试验的研究方案
Trials. 2014 Dec 4;15:476. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-476.
6
Postoperative shoulder pain after laparoscopic hysterectomy with deep neuromuscular blockade and low-pressure pneumoperitoneum: A randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜子宫切除术中采用深度神经肌肉阻滞和低压气腹术后肩部疼痛:一项随机对照试验。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2016 May;33(5):341-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000360.
7
An analysis of feasibility of robotic colectomy: post hoc analysis of a phase III randomised controlled trial.机器人结肠切除术的可行性分析:III 期随机对照试验的事后分析。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Jun;17(3):1057-1063. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01501-x. Epub 2022 Dec 16.
8
Low-impact laparoscopy in colorectal resection-A multicentric randomised trial comparing low-pressure pneumoperitoneum plus microsurgery versus low-pressure pneumoperitoneum alone: The PAROS II trial.结直肠切除术的低创腹腔镜-一项比较低压气腹加微创手术与单纯低压气腹的多中心随机试验:PAROS II 试验。
Colorectal Dis. 2023 Dec;25(12):2403-2413. doi: 10.1111/codi.16787. Epub 2023 Oct 27.
9
Low Pressure versus Standard Pressure Pneumoperitoneum in Laparoscopic Appendectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.低压与标准气压气腹在腹腔镜阑尾切除术中的比较:一项随机对照试验。
Niger J Clin Pract. 2024 Jun 1;27(6):754-758. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_802_23. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
10
Comparison of the effectiveness of low pressure pneumoperitoneum with profound muscle relaxation during laparoscopic donor nephrectomy to optimize the quality of recovery during the early post-operative phase: study protocol for a randomized controlled clinical trial.腹腔镜供肾切除术期间低压气腹联合深度肌肉松弛以优化术后早期恢复质量的有效性比较:一项随机对照临床试验的研究方案
Trials. 2015 Aug 12;16:345. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0887-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Low-Pressure Versus Normal-Pressure Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and its Effect on Intra-Operative Parameters and Post-Operative Pain: An Observational Study.低压与常压腹腔镜胆囊切除术及其对术中参数和术后疼痛的影响:一项观察性研究
Niger Med J. 2025 Jun 16;66(2):715-723. doi: 10.71480/nmj.v66i2.768. eCollection 2025 Mar-Apr.
2
Effect of low-pressure pneumoperitoneum on pain and inflammation in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled clinical trial.低压气腹对腹腔镜胆囊切除术疼痛和炎症的影响:一项随机对照临床试验。
BMC Res Notes. 2023 Sep 28;16(1):235. doi: 10.1186/s13104-023-06492-y.
3
The "Dark Side" of Pneumoperitoneum and Laparoscopy.

本文引用的文献

1
Low-impact laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with decreased postoperative morbidity in patients with sickle cell disease.低创腹腔镜胆囊切除术与镰状细胞病患者术后发病率降低相关。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2300-2311. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5925-y. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
2
A Prospective, Randomized, Clinical Trial on the Effects of a Valveless Trocar on Respiratory Mechanics During Robotic Radical Cystectomy: A Pilot Study.一项关于无瓣膜套管针在机器人根治性膀胱切除术中对呼吸力学影响的前瞻性、随机临床试验:一项初步研究。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Jun;124(6):1794-1801. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002027.
3
Comparison of Pneumoperitoneum Stability Between a Valveless Trocar System and Conventional Insufflation: A Prospective Randomized Trial.
气腹与腹腔镜检查的“黑暗面”
Minim Invasive Surg. 2021 May 19;2021:5564745. doi: 10.1155/2021/5564745. eCollection 2021.
无阀套管系统与传统气腹术气腹稳定性的比较:一项前瞻性随机试验
Urology. 2016 Aug;94:274-80. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.04.022. Epub 2016 Apr 27.
4
Low-pressure versus standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜胆囊切除术中低压气腹与标准压力气腹的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2014 Jul;208(1):143-50. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2013.09.027. Epub 2014 Jan 16.
5
Guidelines for perioperative care in elective colonic surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society recommendations.择期结肠手术围手术期护理指南:术后加速康复(ERAS®)协会建议。
Clin Nutr. 2012 Dec;31(6):783-800. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.013. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
6
Mortality after colorectal cancer surgery: a French survey of more than 84,000 patients.结直肠癌手术后的死亡率:一项涉及 84000 多名患者的法国调查。
Ann Surg. 2011 Nov;254(5):738-43; discussion 743-4. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31823604ac.
7
Laparoscopic versus open sigmoid resection for diverticular disease: follow-up assessment of the randomized control Sigma trial.腹腔镜与开腹乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室病:随机对照 Sigma 试验的随访评估。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Apr;25(4):1121-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1327-0. Epub 2010 Sep 25.
8
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection.腹腔镜与开腹左半结肠切除术的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2010 Aug;97(8):1180-6. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7094.
9
Laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticulitis decreases major morbidity rates: a randomized control trial: short-term results of the Sigma Trial.腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术治疗憩室炎可降低主要发病率:一项随机对照试验:Sigma试验的短期结果
Ann Surg. 2009 Jan;249(1):39-44. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818e416a.
10
Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis.腹腔镜辅助与开放性结肠癌切除术的比较:一项荟萃分析。
Arch Surg. 2007 Mar;142(3):298-303. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.142.3.298.