Sanjay Thodety, Agarwal Karan, Rathod Prajawalam A
Department of General Surgery, Gouri Devi Institute of Medical Sciences & Hospital, Durgapur, India.
Department of General Surgery, Manipal Tata Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education (MAHE) and Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, India.
Niger Med J. 2025 Jun 16;66(2):715-723. doi: 10.71480/nmj.v66i2.768. eCollection 2025 Mar-Apr.
Pneumoperitoneum, created by insufflating carbon dioxide (CO), is essential for surgical visualization, but conventional intra-abdominal pressures (12-15 mmHg) can negatively impact cardiac and respiratory functions. To mitigate these effects, low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (7-10 mmHg) has been suggested. The present study aimed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy at low intra-abdominal pressure with conventional standard pressure laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
A prospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Eastern India over a period of one year, involving 100 patients undergoing elective LC for symptomatic uncomplicated cholelithiasis. Participants were divided into two groups: low-pressure pneumoperitoneum (LPP) (7-10 mmHg) and standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum (SPP) (12-15 mmHg). Key parameters such as operative time, hemodynamic changes, CO consumption, postoperative pain, and hospital stay were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS version 16.0, with p<0.05 considered significant.
The study found no significant difference in operative duration between LPP and SPP groups. However, CO consumption was significantly lower in the LPP group (p=0.040). Postoperative shoulder tip pain was more frequent in the SPP group (p=0.041). Additionally, patients in the LPP group had a significantly shorter hospital stay (p=0.042). Hemodynamic changes, particularly in heart rate and systolic blood pressure, were less pronounced in the LPP group compared to the SPP group.
Low-pressure pneumoperitoneum in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is associated with reduced CO consumption, less postoperative pain, better preservation of hemodynamics, and shorter hospital stays compared to standard-pressure pneumoperitoneum. Despite potential challenges for surgeons, LPP appears to be a safe and feasible alternative for uncomplicated gallstone surgery in the hands of skilled professionals.
通过注入二氧化碳(CO₂)形成气腹对于手术视野的清晰至关重要,但传统的腹腔内压力(12 - 15 mmHg)会对心脏和呼吸功能产生负面影响。为减轻这些影响,有人提出了低压气腹(7 - 10 mmHg)。本研究旨在比较低腹腔内压力下的腹腔镜胆囊切除术与传统标准压力腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果。
在印度东部的一家三级护理医院进行了一项为期一年的前瞻性观察研究,纳入100例因有症状的单纯性胆石症接受择期腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)的患者。参与者被分为两组:低压气腹(LPP)组(7 - 10 mmHg)和标准压力气腹(SPP)组(12 - 15 mmHg)。记录手术时间、血流动力学变化、CO₂消耗量、术后疼痛和住院时间等关键参数。使用SPSS 16.0版进行统计分析,p<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
研究发现LPP组和SPP组在手术持续时间上无显著差异。然而,LPP组的CO₂消耗量显著更低(p = 0.040)。SPP组术后肩峰端疼痛更频繁(p = 0.041)。此外,LPP组患者的住院时间显著更短(p = 0.042)。与SPP组相比,LPP组的血流动力学变化,尤其是心率和收缩压的变化不那么明显。
与标准压力气腹相比,腹腔镜胆囊切除术中的低压气腹与减少CO₂消耗、减轻术后疼痛、更好地维持血流动力学以及缩短住院时间相关。尽管对外科医生可能存在潜在挑战,但在熟练专业人员手中,LPP似乎是单纯性胆结石手术的一种安全可行的替代方法。