Differential diagnosis of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma and papillary renal cell carcinoma with dual-energy spectral computed tomography.

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) image features of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) and papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) are, occasionally, sometimes difficult to identify. However, spectral CT might provide quantitative parameters to differentiate them.

PURPOSE

To differentiate between ChRCC and PRCC with quantitative parameters using spectral CT.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty cases of RCC confirmed with pathological tests were analyzed retrospectively (27 cases of PRCC and 13 cases of ChRCC). All patients underwent non-enhanced CT and dual-phase contrast-enhanced CT scans. For each lesion, the CT value of monochromatic images as well as iodine and water concentrations were measured, and the slope of spectrum curve was calculated. Data were analyzed using Student's t-test. Sensitivity and specificity of the quantitative parameters were analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

During the cortex phase (CP) and parenchyma phase (PP), the CT value and slope of spectrum curve of ChRCC were higher than those of PRCC, and significant differences were observed at low energy levels (40-70 keV). Normalized iodine concentration of ChRCC and that of PRCC was significantly different during CP and PP ( < 0.05). The water (iodine) concentrations of ChRCC and PRCC in CP and PP were not statistically different ( > 0.05). All the ROCs for parameters were above the reference line.

CONCLUSION

Spectral CT may help increase the diagnostic accuracy of differentiating PRCC from ChRCC using a quantitative analysis.