Value of energy spectrum CT parameters in the differential diagnosis of high-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma and type II papillary renal cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND

Energy spectrum computed tomography (CT) has become a promising approach for the differential diagnosis of tumor subtypes.

PURPOSE

To explore the value of energy spectrum CT parameters in the differential diagnosis of high-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and type II papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Forty-two cases of high-grade ccRCC and 28 cases of type II pRCC were retrospectively reviewed. All region of interest (ROI) measurements were maintained consistently between the two-phase contrast-enhanced examinations. The ROIs encompassed as much of the enhancing areas of the lesions as possible. Energy spectrum CT parameters of all cases, including the 70 keV (HU) value, normalized iodine concentration (NIC), and energy spectrum curve slope were recorded by two radiologists with over 10 years of experience in abdominal CT diagnosis.

RESULTS

In the cortical phase (CP) and parenchymal phase (PP), the 70 keV (HU) value, NIC, and slope value of the energy spectrum curve of high-grade ccRCC were significantly higher than those of type II pRCC. In the CP, NIC showed the highest differential diagnosis efficiency for the two group tumors, with a sensitivity of 78.9% and a specificity of 77.0%. There was no statistical difference in tumor hemorrhage, tumor envelope, tumor morphology, tumor border, lymph node metastasis, embolism, renal pelvis invasion, or tumor calcification between the two tumor types. However, there was significant difference in the number of tumors ( = 0.019).

CONCLUSION

Energy spectrum CT parameters are valuable for the differential diagnosis of high-grade ccRCC and type II pRCC.