Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Faculty of Biosciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, PO Box 5003, 1432 Ås, Norway.
GENO Breeding and AI Association, 2326 Hamar, Norway.
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Apr;103(4):3325-3333. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17503. Epub 2020 Feb 20.
The aim was to investigate whether subjectively scored milking speed, temperament, and leakage are genetically the same trait when measured in different milking systems. Data were provided by the Norwegian Dairy Herd Recording System and included a total of 260,731 first-parity Norwegian Red cows calving between January 2009 and February 2019 and milked either in a traditional milking system (milking parlor or pipeline) or by an automatic milking system (AMS). Genetic parameters were estimated and lower heritabilities and less genetic variation were found for the 3 traits when measured in AMS herds. The heritability of temperament, leakage, and milking speed were 0.05, 0.04, and 0.22, respectively, with data from AMS herds; and 0.09, 0.14, and 0.27, respectively, with data from cows milked in traditional milking systems. The genetic correlations between temperament and leakage (-0.19), between milking speed and leakage (-0.88), and between milking speed and temperament (0.30) in AMS were slightly stronger than between the corresponding traits assessed in other milking systems (-0.15, -0.82, and 0.16, respectively). The genetic correlations between traits across milking systems were strong: 0.98, 0.96, and 0.86 for milking speed, leakage, and temperament, respectively. Strong correlations indicate that the traits were almost genetically similar despite being scored in different milking systems. The rank correlations among estimated sire breeding values were strong: 0.98 and 0.99 for milking speed and leakage, with little or no reranking of bull performance across milking systems. Temperament had the lowest genetic correlation (0.86) and rank correlation (0.91) across milking systems. These data suggest that AMS farmers evaluate temperament slightly differently from farmers using other milking systems or that different aspects of temperament are important for farmers with AMS.
本研究旨在探讨在不同挤奶系统中评估时,奶牛主观评分的挤奶速度、气质和漏奶是否为同一遗传性状。数据来源于挪威奶牛记录系统,共包含 2009 年 1 月至 2019 年 2 月间初次产犊的 260731 头挪威红牛,分别在传统挤奶系统(挤奶厅或管道)或自动挤奶系统(AMS)下挤奶。估计了遗传参数,结果发现,在 AMS 牛群中,3 个性状的遗传力较低,遗传变异较少。气质、漏奶和挤奶速度的遗传力分别为 0.05、0.04 和 0.22,数据来自 AMS 牛群;分别为 0.09、0.14 和 0.27,数据来自传统挤奶系统挤奶的奶牛。在 AMS 中,气质和漏奶之间(-0.19)、挤奶速度和漏奶之间(-0.88)以及挤奶速度和气质之间(0.30)的遗传相关性略强于其他挤奶系统中评估的相应性状(分别为-0.15、-0.82 和 0.16)。不同挤奶系统之间性状的遗传相关性很强:挤奶速度、漏奶和气质的遗传相关性分别为 0.98、0.96 和 0.86。强相关性表明,尽管在不同的挤奶系统中进行评分,但这些性状在遗传上几乎相似。估计的种公牛育种值之间的等级相关性很强:挤奶速度和漏奶的等级相关性分别为 0.98 和 0.99,不同挤奶系统之间公牛性能的排名几乎没有变化。气质的遗传相关性最低(0.86)和等级相关性(0.91)。这些数据表明,AMS 农民对气质的评估与使用其他挤奶系统的农民略有不同,或者对于使用 AMS 的农民来说,气质的不同方面可能很重要。