Park Shin-Goo, Kim Hyung-Doo, Min Jin-Young, Min Kyoug-Bok, Hwang Sang-Hee, Jang Eun-Chul
Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Republic of Korea (Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine).
Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea (Institute of Health and Environment).
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020 Mar 13;33(2):187-194. doi: 10.13075/ijomeh.1896.01448. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
A cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate whether working hours mismatch is associated with workaholism.
This study used the data from the 17th wave (2014) of the nationwide Korean Labor and Income Panel Study. Workaholism was evaluated using the Workaholism Analysis Questionnaire. The final study involved 3157 subjects who answered questions regarding both workaholism and working hours mismatch. To identify the association between working hours mismatch and workaholism according to weekly working hours, a stratification analysis was conducted by dividing the number of working hours/week into 3 groups (≤40 h, 41-59 h, and ≥60 h). The odds ratios were calculated using a multiple logistic regression model, which was adjusted for potential confounders.
The workers working more hours than desired showed the greatest frequency of workaholism. As regards workaholism, in all weekly working hours groups, the odds ratios of the group working more hours than desired were 4.28, 95% CI: 2.29-7.99 (≥40 h), 2.14, 95% CI: 1.34-3.43 (41-59 h), 3.40, 95% CI: 1.60-7.21 (≤60 h), which were statistically significant compared to the reference (matched) group. There was no statistically significant relationship between working hours and workaholism when stratified according to the mismatch in working hours.
The workers' working hours mismatch can be significantly related to workaholism. Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2020;33(2):187-94.
开展一项横断面研究，以调查工作时间不匹配是否与工作狂行为有关。
本研究使用了韩国全国劳动与收入面板研究第17轮（2014年）的数据。使用工作狂分析问卷对工作狂行为进行评估。最终研究纳入了3157名既回答了有关工作狂行为问题又回答了工作时间不匹配问题的受试者。为了根据每周工作时间确定工作时间不匹配与工作狂行为之间的关联，通过将每周工作小时数分为3组（≤40小时、41 - 59小时和≥60小时）进行分层分析。使用多元逻辑回归模型计算比值比，并对潜在混杂因素进行了调整。
工作时间超过期望的工人表现出工作狂行为的频率最高。关于工作狂行为，在所有每周工作时间组中，工作时间超过期望的组的比值比分别为4.28，95%置信区间：2.29 - 7.99（≥40小时），2.14，95%置信区间：1.34 - 3.43（41 - 59小时），3.40，95%置信区间：1.60 - 7.21（≤60小时），与参照（匹配）组相比具有统计学显著性。根据工作时间不匹配进行分层时，工作时间与工作狂行为之间没有统计学显著关系。
工人的工作时间不匹配可能与工作狂行为显著相关。《国际职业医学与环境卫生杂志》。2020年；33(2)：187 - 94。
