Pandurangan Kiran Kumar, Veeraiyan Deepak Nallaswamy, Nesappan Thiyaneswaran
Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Jan-Mar;20(1):90-96. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_222_19. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
This study was to compare the fracture resistance and cyclic fatigue resistance of hand-layered zirconia crowns and computer-aided design (CAD)-on crowns (lithium disilicate with zirconium oxide).
Comparative - study design.
All ceramic crown preparation was done on a mandibular molar ivorine tooth, impression made, and duplicated. Twenty hand-layered zirconia crowns and twenty CAD-on crowns were fabricated using CAD/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technique. All crowns were cemented to their respective dies using resin cement for evaluating fracture resistance and cyclic fatigue resistance using universal testing machine.
Independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Shapiro-Wilk test were used.
The mean fracture resistance of CAD-on crowns (2660.50 ± 501.303 N) was significantly more than that of hand-layered zirconia crowns (1963.60 ± 452.895 N) (independent samples t-test, < 0.023). Cyclic fatigue resistance test results showed that the mean number of cycles before failure for hand-layered zirconia crowns was 175,297 and for CAD-on crowns was 212,097 (Mann-Whitney U-test, < 0.012).
CAD-on crowns were found to have significantly higher fracture resistance and cyclic fatigue resistance properties than hand-layered zirconia crowns.
本研究旨在比较手工分层氧化锆全冠与计算机辅助设计(CAD)全冠(含氧化锆的二硅酸锂)的抗折性和循环疲劳抗性。
对比研究设计。
在一颗下颌磨牙象牙质牙上制备全瓷冠,制取印模并复制。采用CAD/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)技术制作20个手工分层氧化锆全冠和20个CAD全冠。使用树脂粘结剂将所有全冠粘结到各自的代型上,然后使用万能试验机评估抗折性和循环疲劳抗性。
采用独立样本t检验、曼-惠特尼U检验和夏皮罗-威尔克检验。
CAD全冠的平均抗折力(2660.50±501.303 N)显著高于手工分层氧化锆全冠(1963.60±452.895 N)(独立样本t检验,P<0.023)。循环疲劳抗性测试结果显示,手工分层氧化锆全冠失效前的平均循环次数为175297次,CAD全冠为212097次(曼-惠特尼U检验,P<0.012)。
发现CAD全冠比手工分层氧化锆全冠具有显著更高的抗折性和循环疲劳抗性。