Suppr超能文献

在环氧树脂模具上粘结后,对计算机辅助设计制作和手工分层制作的氧化锆全冠的抗折性和循环疲劳抗性进行评估。

evaluation of fracture resistance and cyclic fatigue resistance of computer-aided design-on and hand-layered zirconia crowns following cementation on epoxy dies.

作者信息

Pandurangan Kiran Kumar, Veeraiyan Deepak Nallaswamy, Nesappan Thiyaneswaran

机构信息

Department of Prosthodontics, Saveetha Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Jan-Mar;20(1):90-96. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_222_19. Epub 2020 Jan 27.

Abstract

AIM

This study was to compare the fracture resistance and cyclic fatigue resistance of hand-layered zirconia crowns and computer-aided design (CAD)-on crowns (lithium disilicate with zirconium oxide).

SETTINGS AND DESIGN

Comparative - study design.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All ceramic crown preparation was done on a mandibular molar ivorine tooth, impression made, and duplicated. Twenty hand-layered zirconia crowns and twenty CAD-on crowns were fabricated using CAD/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technique. All crowns were cemented to their respective dies using resin cement for evaluating fracture resistance and cyclic fatigue resistance using universal testing machine.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

Independent samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and Shapiro-Wilk test were used.

RESULTS

The mean fracture resistance of CAD-on crowns (2660.50 ± 501.303 N) was significantly more than that of hand-layered zirconia crowns (1963.60 ± 452.895 N) (independent samples t-test, < 0.023). Cyclic fatigue resistance test results showed that the mean number of cycles before failure for hand-layered zirconia crowns was 175,297 and for CAD-on crowns was 212,097 (Mann-Whitney U-test, < 0.012).

CONCLUSION

CAD-on crowns were found to have significantly higher fracture resistance and cyclic fatigue resistance properties than hand-layered zirconia crowns.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较手工分层氧化锆全冠与计算机辅助设计(CAD)全冠(含氧化锆的二硅酸锂)的抗折性和循环疲劳抗性。

设置与设计

对比研究设计。

材料与方法

在一颗下颌磨牙象牙质牙上制备全瓷冠,制取印模并复制。采用CAD/计算机辅助制造(CAD/CAM)技术制作20个手工分层氧化锆全冠和20个CAD全冠。使用树脂粘结剂将所有全冠粘结到各自的代型上,然后使用万能试验机评估抗折性和循环疲劳抗性。

所用统计分析方法

采用独立样本t检验、曼-惠特尼U检验和夏皮罗-威尔克检验。

结果

CAD全冠的平均抗折力(2660.50±501.303 N)显著高于手工分层氧化锆全冠(1963.60±452.895 N)(独立样本t检验,P<0.023)。循环疲劳抗性测试结果显示,手工分层氧化锆全冠失效前的平均循环次数为175297次,CAD全冠为212097次(曼-惠特尼U检验,P<0.012)。

结论

发现CAD全冠比手工分层氧化锆全冠具有显著更高的抗折性和循环疲劳抗性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acbf/7008630/ab779b054e1f/JIPS-20-90-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验