Suppr超能文献

一项针对学龄前和学龄儿童的计算机化分辨视力测试。

A computerized resolution visual acuity test in preschool and school age children.

作者信息

Qin Ying-Yan, Liu Zhen-Zhen, Zhu Li-Yuan, Bao Xuan, Luo Fu-Rong, Liu Yi-Zhi, Tsau Young, Wu Ming-Xing

机构信息

State key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong Province, China.

Dimetek Digital Medical Technologies, Limited, Shenzhen 518052, Guangdong Province, China.

出版信息

Int J Ophthalmol. 2020 Feb 18;13(2):284-291. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.02.13. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

AIM

To develop a novel approach called the Autoacuity Tester, and to evaluate its validity, especially the sensitivity and specificity for detecting amblyopia.

METHODS

Children aged from 3 to 12y (=552) were enrolled in the study. The validity of the Autoacuity Tester was evaluated by comparing it to the Tumbling E Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) acuity chart for school age children, and Lea Symbols and Teller acuity card (TAC) for preschool children. The repeatability was assessed by coefficient of repeatability (COR). The sensitivity and specificity for detecting amblyopia were calculated.

RESULTS

The mean difference (95% limits of agreement) between the Autoacuity Tester and the ETDRS tests were -0.03 (-0.24, 0.19) logMAR for the school age group. In preschool children, the mean difference was 0.04 (-0.14, 0.21) logMAR between the Autoacuity Tester and the TAC and 0.00 (-0.17, 0.18) logMAR between the Autoacuity Tester and the Lea Symbols. For the school age group, the COR was 0.20 logMAR for the Autoacuity Tester and 0.18 logMAR for the ETDRS. For the preschool group, the COR was 0.13 logMAR for the Autoacuity Tester and 0.21 logMAR for TAC. The Autoacuity Tester (88%) is more sensitive than TAC (72%) in detecting amblyopia (=0.04), while had similar specificity (92% 90%, =0.20).

CONCLUSION

The Autoacuity Tester provides a reliable alternative for assessing visual acuity, and offers advantage of higher testability and repeatability for preschool children.

摘要

目的

开发一种名为自动视力测试仪的新方法,并评估其有效性,尤其是检测弱视的敏感性和特异性。

方法

纳入3至12岁的儿童(n = 552)参与本研究。通过将自动视力测试仪与学龄儿童的糖尿病视网膜病变早期治疗研究(ETDRS)视力表以及学龄前儿童的利雅符号和泰勒视力卡(TAC)进行比较,评估自动视力测试仪的有效性。通过重复性系数(COR)评估重复性。计算检测弱视的敏感性和特异性。

结果

学龄组中,自动视力测试仪与ETDRS测试之间的平均差异(95%一致性界限)为-0.03(-0.24,0.19)logMAR。在学龄前儿童中,自动视力测试仪与TAC之间的平均差异为0.04(-0.14,0.21)logMAR,自动视力测试仪与利雅符号之间的平均差异为0.00(-0.17,0.18)logMAR。对于学龄组,自动视力测试仪的COR为0.20 logMAR,ETDRS为0.18 logMAR。对于学龄前组,自动视力测试仪的COR为0.13 logMAR,TAC为0.21 logMAR。自动视力测试仪(88%)在检测弱视方面比TAC(72%)更敏感(P = 0.04),而特异性相似(92%对90%,P = 0.20)。

结论

自动视力测试仪为评估视力提供了一种可靠的替代方法,并且为学龄前儿童提供了更高的可测试性和重复性优势。

相似文献

4
7
Comparison of the HOTV and Lea symbols visual acuity tests in patients with amblyopia.弱视患者中HOTV和Lea符号视力测试的比较。
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2006 May-Jun;43(3):157-60. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20060301-03.

引用本文的文献

1
Home-based screening tools for amblyopia: a systematic review.基于家庭的弱视筛查工具:系统评价。
Eye (Lond). 2023 Sep;37(13):2649-2658. doi: 10.1038/s41433-023-02412-3. Epub 2023 Feb 24.

本文引用的文献

3
Pediatric Vision Screening.儿科视力筛查
Pediatr Rev. 2018 May;39(5):225-234. doi: 10.1542/pir.2016-0191.
5
Instrument-based pediatric vision screening.基于仪器的儿童视力筛查。
Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;27(5):398-401. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000289.
8
Infant visual attention and object recognition.婴儿视觉注意力与物体识别。
Behav Brain Res. 2015 May 15;285:34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.01.015. Epub 2015 Jan 14.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验