• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同替格瑞洛治疗方案与氯吡格雷在冠心病患者中的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性多中心研究(SUPERIOR)

Efficacy and safety of different ticagrelor regimens versus clopidogrel in patients with coronary artery disease: a retrospective multicenter study (SUPERIOR).

作者信息

Shi Jing, He Meijiao, Wang Wennan, Liu Guangzhong, Zhang Haiyu, Sun Danghui, Li Jianqiang, Mu Hongyuan, Xu Minglu, Zhao Chenyang, Wang Jiayu, Zhang Chongyang, Cang Hai, Zhao Shiqi, Zhang Zhiren, Li Yue

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Harbin Medical University , Harbin, China.

Institute of Metabolic Disease, Heilongjiang Academy of Medical Science , Harbin, China.

出版信息

Platelets. 2021 Jan 2;32(1):120-129. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2020.1732328. Epub 2020 Feb 23.

DOI:10.1080/09537104.2020.1732328
PMID:32090650
Abstract

Current guidelines favor dual anti-platelet therapy with ticagrelor 90 mg BID (T90BID) over clopidogrel 75 mg QD (C75QD) in addition to aspirin for acute coronary syndrome. However, an increased risk of ticagrelor-related adverse events prompted the evaluation of low-dose regimens. This study (NCT03381742) retrospectively analyzed the data from 11 hospitals on 3,043 patients with coronary artery disease, who received C75QD, T90BID, ticagrelor 45 mg BID (T45BID), or ticagrelor 90 mg QD (T90QD). Compared with C75QD, both T45BID and T90QD showed significantly higher inhibition of platelet aggregation ( < .0001) and lower platelet-fibrin clot strength ( < .0001) induced by adenosine diphosphate. Furthermore, compared with T90BID, two low-dose regimens had a much lower minor bleeding rate and a significantly higher proportion of patients within the therapeutic window for P2Y receptor reactivity. There were no significant differences between T45BID and T90QD in the trough plasma concentrations of ticagrelor and its active metabolite. Similar efficacy and safety outcomes were observed in the propensity score-matched analysis. In conclusion, the low-dose ticagrelor regimen, either T45BID or T90QD, may provide a more attractive benefit-risk profile than C75QD or T90BID.

摘要

目前的指南支持在阿司匹林基础上,使用替格瑞洛90毫克每日两次(T90BID)进行双重抗血小板治疗,而非氯吡格雷75毫克每日一次(C75QD),用于急性冠状动脉综合征。然而,替格瑞洛相关不良事件风险的增加促使人们对低剂量方案进行评估。本研究(NCT03381742)回顾性分析了11家医院3043例冠心病患者的数据,这些患者接受了C75QD、T90BID、替格瑞洛45毫克每日两次(T45BID)或替格瑞洛90毫克每日一次(T90QD)治疗。与C75QD相比,T45BID和T90QD对二磷酸腺苷诱导的血小板聚集抑制作用均显著更高(<0.0001),血小板 - 纤维蛋白凝块强度更低(<0.0001)。此外,与T90BID相比,两种低剂量方案的轻微出血率更低,且处于P2Y受体反应性治疗窗内的患者比例显著更高。替格瑞洛及其活性代谢产物的谷浓度在T45BID和T90QD之间无显著差异。倾向评分匹配分析中观察到了相似的疗效和安全性结果。总之,低剂量替格瑞洛方案,即T45BID或T90QD,可能比C75QD或T90BID具有更具吸引力的效益风险比。

相似文献

1
Efficacy and safety of different ticagrelor regimens versus clopidogrel in patients with coronary artery disease: a retrospective multicenter study (SUPERIOR).不同替格瑞洛治疗方案与氯吡格雷在冠心病患者中的疗效和安全性:一项回顾性多中心研究(SUPERIOR)
Platelets. 2021 Jan 2;32(1):120-129. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2020.1732328. Epub 2020 Feb 23.
2
Platelet Inhibition with Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Diabetic Patients after Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Chronic Coronary Syndromes.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对慢性冠脉综合征经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的糖尿病患者的血小板抑制作用比较。
Thromb Haemost. 2020 Aug;120(8):1221-1229. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1713375. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Ticagrelor in Comparison to Clopidogrel in Elderly Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarctions.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗老年 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者的疗效和安全性比较。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Sep 17;8(18):e012530. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012530. Epub 2019 Sep 5.
4
Effects of different doses of ticagrelor on platelet aggregation and endothelial function in diabetic patients with stable coronary artery disease.不同剂量替格瑞洛对稳定型冠心病合并糖尿病患者血小板聚集和血管内皮功能的影响。
Platelets. 2019;30(6):752-761. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2018.1513479. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
5
Clopidogrel versus ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients aged 70 years or older with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome (POPular AGE): the randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.氯吡格雷与替格瑞洛或普拉格雷在 70 岁或以上非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者中的比较(POPular AGE):随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2020 Apr 25;395(10233):1374-1381. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30325-1.
6
Effects of ticagrelor monotherapy vs. clopidogrel monotherapy on platelet reactivity: a randomized, crossover clinical study (SINGLE study).替格瑞洛单药治疗与氯吡格雷单药治疗对血小板反应性的影响:一项随机交叉临床研究(SINGLE研究)。
Platelets. 2022 Nov 17;33(8):1146-1152. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2022.2052036. Epub 2022 Apr 5.
7
Antiplatelet effects of ticagrelor versus clopidogrel after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A single-center randomized controlled trial.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对冠状动脉旁路移植术后的抗血小板作用:一项单中心随机对照试验。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Aug;158(2):430-437.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.10.032. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
8
Platelet reactivity in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor in comparison to clopidogrel: a retrospective pharmacodynamic analysis.比较普拉格雷或替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗急性冠脉综合征患者的血小板反应性:一项回顾性药效学分析。
Platelets. 2019;30(3):341-347. doi: 10.1080/09537104.2018.1445836. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
9
Ticagrelor Versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Two CYP2C19 Loss-of-Function Alleles Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中携带两个 CYP2C19 失活等位基因的患者中的比较。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2020 Apr;34(2):179-188. doi: 10.1007/s10557-020-06956-4.
10
Antiplatelet effect of ticagrelor with aspirin in acute minor stroke and transient ischemic attack stratified by metabolizer status: subgroup analysis of the PRINCE trial.替格瑞洛联合阿司匹林在急性小卒中和短暂性脑缺血发作患者中的抗血小板作用:PRINCE 试验亚组分析按代谢物状态分层。
Aging (Albany NY). 2020 Dec 19;13(3):3994-4006. doi: 10.18632/aging.202366.

引用本文的文献

1
Ticagrelor Steady-State Trough Concentration in Chinese Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.中国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者替格瑞洛稳态谷浓度。
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2024 Jan;49(1):33-42. doi: 10.1007/s13318-023-00867-z. Epub 2023 Nov 24.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in East Asian Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Treated with Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于东亚行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者双联抗血小板治疗的安全性和有效性:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Cardiology. 2023;148(4):363-373. doi: 10.1159/000530602. Epub 2023 Apr 24.