School of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, United Kingdom.
Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, United Kingdom.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020 Feb 26;63(2):585-598. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00157. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
Purpose The study explored longitudinally the course of vocabulary and general language development in a group of infants with Down syndrome (DS) compared to a group of typically developing (TD) infants matched on nonverbal mental ability (NVMA). Method We compared the vocabulary and general language trajectories of the two groups in two ways: (a) at three time points during a 12-month period and (b) at two time points when the groups had made equal progress in NVMA (a period of 6 months for the TD infants vs. 12 months for the infants with DS). Results The TD group had overtaken the DS group on all general language and vocabulary measures by the end of the 12-month period. However, expressive communication and expressive vocabulary were developing at the same rate and level in the two groups when examined over a period in which the two groups were matched in gains in NVMA. Furthermore, the infants with DS showed a receptive language advantage over the TD group; this group's auditory comprehension and receptive vocabulary scores were superior to those of the TD group at both time points when NVMA was accounted for. Conclusion The results shed light on the widely reported discrepancy between expressive and receptive language in individuals with DS. Although infants with DS appear to be developing language skills more slowly than chronological age TD peers, when NVMA is taken into account, infants with DS do not have expressive language delays, and they seem to show a receptive language advantage.
本研究纵向探讨了一组唐氏综合征(DS)婴儿与一组在非言语智力(NVMA)上相匹配的典型发育(TD)婴儿的词汇和一般语言发展的过程。
我们通过两种方式比较了两组的词汇和一般语言轨迹:(a)在 12 个月期间的三个时间点,以及(b)在两组在 NVMA 上取得相等进展时的两个时间点(TD 婴儿为 6 个月,DS 婴儿为 12 个月)。
到 12 个月期末,TD 组在所有一般语言和词汇测量上都超过了 DS 组。然而,当考察两组在 NVMA 增益相匹配的一段时间内,两组的表达性沟通和表达性词汇的发展速度和水平相同。此外,DS 组在接受性语言方面表现出优于 TD 组的优势;在考虑到 NVMA 时,该组的听觉理解和接受性词汇得分在两个时间点都优于 TD 组。
结果阐明了在 DS 个体中广泛报道的表达性语言和接受性语言之间的差异。尽管 DS 婴儿的语言技能似乎比其实际年龄的 TD 同龄人发展得更慢,但当考虑到 NVMA 时,DS 婴儿没有表达性语言延迟,并且他们似乎表现出接受性语言优势。