Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Castilla-La-Mancha, Avda Real Fábrica de la Seda s/n, 45600, Talavera de la Reina, Spain.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Pychology, University Complutense. Campus de Somosaguas, 28223, Pozuelo de Alarcón. Madrid, Spain.
BMC Psychol. 2024 Feb 15;12(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01508-5.
Pragmatics is an area that can be affected in a wide variety of disorders. In this sense, Syndromic Autism is defined as a disorder in which a causal link is established between an associated syndrome and Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD). Likewise, Down Syndrome (DS) is one of the main genetically based syndromes in which ASD is described as one of its possible manifestations. In this direction, people with DS are described as social beings whereas in ASD there seems to be a specific alteration of this domain.
In this study, pragmatic performance was analysed in a sample of 72 participants, where comparisons were made between the scores obtained by children with ASD (n = 24), with DS (n = 24) and with DS + ASD (n = 24).
The Social Communication Questionnaire (SCQ), the Block Objective and Criterial Language Battery (BLOC-SR) and the Neuropsychology subtest (NEPSY-II) aimed at Theory of Mind (ToM) identified significant differences between the groups. However, two-to-two comparisons reported no significant differences between DS and DS + ASD.
Although several studies report differences between the three proposed groups, our data seem to suggest that ASD symptomatology in DS is associated with Intellectual Developmental Disorder (IDD). However, the lack of solid scientific evidence regarding comorbid diagnosis makes further research along these lines indispensable.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee for Social Research at UCLM with reference CEIS-704,511-L8M4.
语用学是一个可能受到多种障碍影响的领域。在这个意义上,综合征自闭症被定义为一种在相关综合征和自闭症谱系障碍(ASD)之间建立因果联系的障碍。同样,唐氏综合征(DS)是主要的基于遗传的综合征之一,其中 ASD 被描述为其可能的表现之一。在这个方向上,DS 患者被描述为社会人,而在 ASD 中,这个领域似乎存在特定的改变。
在这项研究中,对 72 名参与者的语用表现进行了分析,对 ASD 儿童(n=24)、DS 儿童(n=24)和 DS+ASD 儿童(n=24)的得分进行了比较。
社会沟通问卷(SCQ)、块目标和标准语言电池(BLOC-SR)和神经心理学测试(NEPSY-II)旨在评估心理理论(ToM),这些测试在三组之间都存在显著差异。然而,两两比较报告称 DS 和 DS+ASD 之间没有显著差异。
尽管几项研究报告了这三个提出的组之间存在差异,但我们的数据似乎表明 DS 中的 ASD 症状与智力发育障碍(IDD)有关。然而,由于缺乏关于合并诊断的可靠科学证据,进一步沿着这些方向进行研究是必不可少的。
本研究得到 UCLM 社会研究伦理委员会的批准,参考号为 CEIS-704,511-L8M4。