• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荷兰患者家中的强制治疗:精神卫生专业人员对此怎么看?

Compulsory treatment in patients' homes in the Netherlands: what do mental health professionals think of this?

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, ETZ Hospital (Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuis), Hilvarenbeekseweg 60, Tilburg, 5022 GC, the Netherlands.

Vincent van Gogh for Mental Health, Venray, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 24;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02501-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12888-020-02501-7
PMID:32093641
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7041256/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Compulsory treatment in patients' homes (CTH) will be introduced in the new Dutch mental health legislation. The aim of this study is to identify the opinions of mental health workers in the Netherlands on compulsory community treatment (CCT), and particularly on compulsory treatment in the patients' home.

METHODS

This is a mixed methods study, comprising a semi-structured interview and a survey. Forty mental health workers took part in the semi-structured interview about CCT and 20 of them, working in outpatient services, also completed a questionnaire about CTH. Descriptive analyses were performed of indicated (dis) advantages and problems of CCT and of mean scores on the CTH questionnaire.

RESULTS

Overall, the mental health workers seemed to have positive opinions on CCT. With respect to CTH, all mean scores were in the middle of the range, possibly indicating that clinicians were uncertain regarding safety issues and potential practical problems accompanying the use of CTH.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of the participating mental health workers in this study had a positive attitude towards CCT, but they seemed relative uncertain about potential possibilities and problems of working with CTH.

摘要

背景

新的荷兰精神卫生立法将引入患者家中的强制治疗(CTH)。本研究的目的是确定荷兰精神卫生工作者对强制性社区治疗(CCT)的意见,特别是对患者家中强制治疗的意见。

方法

这是一项混合方法研究,包括半结构化访谈和问卷调查。40 名精神卫生工作者参加了关于 CCT 的半结构化访谈,其中 20 名在门诊服务工作的工作者还完成了关于 CTH 的问卷。对 CCT 的指示(不)优点和问题以及 CTH 问卷的平均得分进行了描述性分析。

结果

总体而言,精神卫生工作者对 CCT 似乎持积极态度。关于 CTH,所有平均得分都处于范围的中间,这可能表明临床医生对使用 CTH 时的安全问题和潜在实际问题不确定。

结论

在这项研究中,大多数参与的精神卫生工作者对 CCT 持积极态度,但他们对使用 CTH 的潜在可能性和问题似乎相对不确定。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c563/7041256/525c7554d42f/12888_2020_2501_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c563/7041256/525c7554d42f/12888_2020_2501_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c563/7041256/525c7554d42f/12888_2020_2501_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Compulsory treatment in patients' homes in the Netherlands: what do mental health professionals think of this?荷兰患者家中的强制治疗:精神卫生专业人员对此怎么看?
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 24;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02501-7.
2
Dutch Mental Health Patients' and Significant Others' Perspectives on Compulsory Treatment at Home: One Size Does Not Fit All.荷兰精神卫生患者及其重要他人对居家强制治疗的看法:一刀切并不适用。
J Patient Exp. 2021 Aug 19;8:23743735211033100. doi: 10.1177/23743735211033100. eCollection 2021.
3
[Compulsory treatment in the community for persons in need of mental health care].[对有精神卫生保健需求者的社区强制治疗]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2017;59(4):221-228.
4
Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders.针对严重精神障碍患者的强制社区治疗和非自愿门诊治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014(12):CD004408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004408.pub4. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
5
[The number of compulsory admissions continues to rise: implications for the new Dutch law on obligatory mental health care].[强制入院人数持续上升:对荷兰新的义务性精神卫生保健法的影响]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2015;57(4):240-7.
6
Crucial factors preceding compulsory psychiatric admission: a qualitative patient-record study.强制精神科入院前的关键因素:一项定性的病历研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Oct 24;17(1):350. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1512-y.
7
Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders.对严重精神障碍患者的强制社区治疗和非自愿门诊治疗。
Schizophr Bull. 2015 May;41(3):542-3. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbv021. Epub 2015 Mar 12.
8
[Psychiatric past history and health care after compulsory admission. Care use as an indicator of the quality of care for patients in compulsory care in Rotterdam].[精神科既往病史与强制入院后的医疗保健。作为鹿特丹强制医疗中患者护理质量指标的护理利用情况]
Tijdschr Psychiatr. 2006;48(2):81-93.
9
Compulsory community and involuntary outpatient treatment for people with severe mental disorders.对严重精神障碍患者的强制社区治疗和非自愿门诊治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20(3):CD004408. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004408.pub2.
10
[Continuous increase in community treatment orders and compulsory admissions in the Netherlands, 2003-2017].[2003年至2017年荷兰社区治疗令和强制入院人数持续增加]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2018 Oct 5;162:D2454.

引用本文的文献

1
Design and Validation of Miniaturized Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) Head Coils.微型重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS)头线圈的设计与验证。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Feb 29;24(5):1584. doi: 10.3390/s24051584.
2
Use of compulsory community treatment in mental healthcare: An integrative review of stakeholders' opinions.精神卫生保健中强制社区治疗的使用:利益相关者意见的综合综述
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Nov 3;13:1011961. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1011961. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Human rights-based approaches to mental health legislation and global mental health.基于人权的心理健康立法与全球心理健康方法。
BJPsych Int. 2019 May;16(2):37-40. doi: 10.1192/bji.2018.5.
2
The experience of the use of Community Treatment Orders following recovery-oriented practice training.康复导向实践培训后使用社区治疗令的经验。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 May-Jun;64:178-183. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.04.001. Epub 2019 Apr 16.
3
Compulsory community treatment to reduce readmission to hospital and increase engagement with community care in people with mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
强制社区治疗以减少精神疾病患者再次入院并提高其对社区护理的参与度:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 Dec;5(12):1013-1022. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30382-1. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
4
An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled evidence for the effectiveness of community treatment orders.社区治疗令有效性的随机对照证据的更新荟萃分析。
Can J Psychiatry. 2014 Oct;59(10):561-4. doi: 10.1177/070674371405901010.
5
Community treatment orders: background and implications of the OCTET trial.社区治疗令:OCTET试验的背景及影响
Psychiatr Bull (2014). 2014 Feb;38(1):3-5. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.044628.
6
'When coercion moves into your home'--a qualitative study of patient experiences with outpatient commitment in Norway.“当强制手段进入你的家门”——挪威一项关于患者门诊强制治疗经历的定性研究
Health Soc Care Community. 2014 Sep;22(5):506-14. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12107. Epub 2014 Apr 6.
7
Compulsory community mental health treatment: literature review.强制社区心理健康治疗:文献综述
Int J Nurs Stud. 2009 Sep;46(9):1245-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.02.006. Epub 2009 Mar 17.
8
How mental health clinicians view community treatment orders: a national New Zealand survey.心理健康临床医生如何看待社区治疗令:一项新西兰全国性调查。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;38(10):836-41. doi: 10.1080/j.1440-1614.2004.01470.x.
9
Assessment of four stakeholder groups' preferences concerning outpatient commitment for persons with schizophrenia.评估四个利益相关者群体对精神分裂症患者门诊强制治疗的偏好。
Am J Psychiatry. 2003 Jun;160(6):1139-46. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.6.1139.
10
Involuntary outpatient commitment in Israel: treatment or control?以色列的非自愿门诊治疗承诺:是治疗还是控制?
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2001 Nov-Dec;24(6):637-57. doi: 10.1016/s0160-2527(01)00084-x.