社区治疗令：OCTET试验的背景及影响
Community treatment orders: background and implications of the OCTET trial.
作者信息
Burns Tom, Molodynski Andrew
机构信息
Department of Psychiatry, Warneford Hospital, Oxford.
出版信息
Psychiatr Bull (2014). 2014 Feb;38(1):3-5. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.044628.
Abstract
Community treatment orders (CTOs) were introduced into the UK despite unconvincing international evidence for their effectiveness. The Oxford Community Treatment Order Evaluation Trial (OCTET) is a multisite randomised controlled trial of 333 patients with psychosis conducted in the UK. It confirms an absence of any obvious benefit in reducing relapse despite significant curtailment of liberty. Community mental health teams need to seriously consider whether they should continue using CTOs or shift their clinical focus to strengthening the working alliance.
摘要
尽管国际上缺乏令人信服的证据证明社区治疗令（CTO）的有效性，但它仍被引入了英国。牛津社区治疗令评估试验（OCTET）是在英国对333名精神病患者进行的多中心随机对照试验。该试验证实，尽管患者的自由受到了大幅限制，但在减少复发方面并没有明显的益处。社区心理健康团队需要认真考虑他们是否应该继续使用社区治疗令，还是将临床重点转向加强工作联盟。
相似文献
1
Community treatment orders: background and implications of the OCTET trial.社区治疗令：OCTET试验的背景及影响
Psychiatr Bull (2014). 2014 Feb;38(1):3-5. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.044628.
3
Effect of increased compulsion on readmission to hospital or disengagement from community services for patients with psychosis: follow-up of a cohort from the OCTET trial.强迫行为增加对精神病患者再次入院或脱离社区服务的影响：来自OCTET试验队列的随访
Lancet Psychiatry. 2015 Oct;2(10):881-90. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(15)00231-X. Epub 2015 Sep 8.
4
Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis (OCTET): a randomised controlled trial.社区治疗令对精神病患者的影响（OCTET）：一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2013 May 11;381(9878):1627-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60107-5. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
5
Cost and quality-of-life impacts of community treatment orders (CTOs) for patients with psychosis: economic evaluation of the OCTET trial.社区治疗令（CTO）对精神病患者的成本和生活质量影响：OCTET 试验的经济评估。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;56(1):85-95. doi: 10.1007/s00127-020-01919-4. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
6
Community treatment orders: current evidence and the implications.社区治疗令：当前的证据和影响。
Br J Psychiatry. 2013 Dec;203(6):406-8. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.113.133900.
7
OCTET does not demonstrate a lack of effectiveness for community treatment orders.八面体试验并未表明社区治疗令缺乏有效性。
Psychiatr Bull (2014). 2014 Feb;38(1):36-9. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.044800.
8
Associations between compulsory community treatment and continuity of care in a three year follow-up of the Oxford Community Treatment Order Trial (OCTET) cohort.牛津社区治疗令试验（OCTET）队列三年随访中强制社区治疗与连续护理之间的关联。
BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Apr 28;17(1):151. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1319-x.
9
Recall of patients on community treatment orders over three years in the OCTET CTO cohort.在OCTET社区治疗令队列中对接受社区治疗令三年以上的患者进行召回。
BMC Psychiatry. 2016 Nov 9;16(1):392. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-1102-4.
10
Community treatment orders: clinical and social outcomes, and a subgroup analysis from the OCTET RCT.社区治疗令：临床和社会结局，以及来自OCTET随机对照试验的亚组分析。
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2015 May;131(5):321-9. doi: 10.1111/acps.12373. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
引用本文的文献
1
Compulsory treatment in patients' homes in the Netherlands: what do mental health professionals think of this?荷兰患者家中的强制治疗：精神卫生专业人员对此怎么看？
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Feb 24;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02501-7.
2
Is it the right time to implement Community Treatment Order in India?在印度实施社区治疗令是否时机恰当？
Indian J Psychiatry. 2019 Apr;61(Suppl 4):S816-S820. doi: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_88_19.
3
The OCTET trial, community treatment orders and evidence-based practice.OCTET试验、社区治疗令与循证实践。
Psychiatr Bull (2014). 2014 Aug;38(4):197. doi: 10.1192/pb.38.4.197.
4
OCTET Study: flawed by type 2 error.八重奏研究：受Ⅱ类错误影响存在缺陷。
Psychiatr Bull (2014). 2014 Aug;38(4):196-7. doi: 10.1192/pb.38.4.196b.
5
The epistemic challenges of CTOs: Commentary on . . . Community treatment orders.慢性阻塞性肺疾病的认知挑战：关于……社区治疗令的评论
Psychiatr Bull (2014). 2014 Feb;38(1):6-8. doi: 10.1192/pb.bp.113.045732.
本文引用的文献
1
A systematic review of the effect of community treatment orders on service use.社区治疗令对服务利用影响的系统评价
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2014 Apr;49(4):651-63. doi: 10.1007/s00127-013-0781-0. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
2
Community treatment orders for patients with psychosis (OCTET): a randomised controlled trial.社区治疗令对精神病患者的影响（OCTET）：一项随机对照试验。
Lancet. 2013 May 11;381(9878):1627-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60107-5. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
3
Lawfulness of a randomised trial of the new community treatment order regime for England and Wales.针对英格兰和威尔士新社区治疗令制度的随机试验的合法性。
Med Law Rev. 2011 Winter;19(1):1-26. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwq030. Epub 2011 Feb 2.
4
Randomised evaluation of assertive community treatment: 3-year outcomes.积极社区治疗的随机评估：3年结果
Br J Psychiatry. 2009 Jul;195(1):81-2. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.108.059303.
5
Balancing autonomy and risk: a failure of nerve in England and Wales?平衡自主权与风险：英格兰和威尔士的神经失能？
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2007 Jan-Feb;30(1):71-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2005.08.013. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
6
Assessing the New York City involuntary outpatient commitment pilot program.评估纽约市非自愿门诊治疗试点项目。
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Mar;52(3):330-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.3.330.
7
Can involuntary outpatient commitment reduce hospital recidivism?: Findings from a randomized trial with severely mentally ill individuals.非自愿门诊治疗能否降低住院率？：一项针对重症精神病患者的随机试验结果。
Am J Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;156(12):1968-75. doi: 10.1176/ajp.156.12.1968.
8
Mental health law: civil liberties and the principle of reciprocity.精神卫生法：公民自由与对等原则
BMJ. 1994 Jan 1;308(6920):43-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.308.6920.43.
Zotero 插件