• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

健康素养干预对妊娠结局的影响:系统评价。

Effect of health literacy interventions on pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review.

机构信息

The School of Medicine, The University of Notre Dame, Australia.

The University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, Sydney Health Literacy Lab, Australia.

出版信息

Women Birth. 2021 Mar;34(2):180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Feb 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.wombi.2020.01.010
PMID:32094036
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Low health literacy has been associated with worse health outcomes, but little is known about the effectiveness of health literacy interventions developed for pregnant women.

AIM

To assess the effectiveness of health literacy interventions on pregnancy outcomes through a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

METHODS

Randomised controlled trials that assessed health literacy interventions designed to improve pregnancy outcomes were included. The study protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018094958).

FINDINGS

Of the 1512 records initially identified, 13 studies were included. Three reported on decision-aid interventions, six on face-to-face interventions and four on written interventions (including computer-based interventions or information leaflets). The primary outcomes of interest for this systematic review were knowledge (10/13 studies) and health literacy (2/13 studies) with one study not reporting either primary outcome. A significant improvement in knowledge was found across the 10 studies, however the two studies which measured health literacy only assessed health literacy at a single time-point. Secondary outcomes including health behaviours, fetal outcomes and health-service utilisation were reported in 11 studies, with inconsistent results.

DISCUSSION

Few health literacy interventions have been developed specifically for pregnant women. Although health literacy interventions have the potential to improve knowledge and pregnancy outcomes, current evidence is limited by inconsistent outcomes and measurement, and limited use of health literacy theory to inform intervention design and content. Few studies directly measured health literacy.

CONCLUSION

More research is needed to properly assess the effect of health literacy interventions on pregnancy outcomes. This research should include consideration of health literacy theory in the development of the interventions.

摘要

背景

低健康素养与较差的健康结果相关,但对于针对孕妇开发的健康素养干预措施的有效性知之甚少。

目的

通过系统评价随机对照试验来评估健康素养干预措施对妊娠结局的有效性。

方法

纳入评估旨在改善妊娠结局的健康素养干预措施的随机对照试验。该研究方案在 PROSPERO(CRD42018094958)中进行了注册。

结果

最初确定的 1512 条记录中,有 13 项研究被纳入。其中 3 项报告了决策辅助干预措施,6 项报告了面对面干预措施,4 项报告了书面干预措施(包括基于计算机的干预措施或信息传单)。本系统评价的主要结局是知识(10/13 项研究)和健康素养(2/13 项研究),其中一项研究未报告任何主要结局。10 项研究均发现知识显著提高,但仅评估健康素养的两项研究仅在一个时间点评估健康素养。11 项研究报告了包括健康行为、胎儿结局和卫生服务利用在内的次要结局,但结果不一致。

讨论

很少有专门针对孕妇的健康素养干预措施。尽管健康素养干预措施有可能改善知识和妊娠结局,但目前的证据受到结果不一致和测量、以及健康素养理论在干预设计和内容中的应用有限的限制。很少有研究直接测量健康素养。

结论

需要更多的研究来正确评估健康素养干预措施对妊娠结局的影响。这项研究应在干预措施的开发中考虑健康素养理论。

相似文献

1
Effect of health literacy interventions on pregnancy outcomes: A systematic review.健康素养干预对妊娠结局的影响:系统评价。
Women Birth. 2021 Mar;34(2):180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2020.01.010. Epub 2020 Feb 21.
2
The effect of weight management interventions that include a diet component on weight-related outcomes in pregnant and postpartum women: a systematic review protocol.包含饮食成分的体重管理干预措施对孕妇和产后女性体重相关结局的影响:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):88-98. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1812.
3
Health Literacy in Pregnant Women: A Systematic Review.孕妇健康素养:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 6;18(7):3847. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073847.
4
Establishing the efficacy of interventions to improve health literacy and health behaviours: a systematic review.评估干预措施在提高健康素养和健康行为方面的效果:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jun 30;20(1):1040. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08991-0.
5
Interventions to Improve Health among Reproductive-Age Women of Low Health Literacy: A Systematic Review.改善低健康素养育龄期妇女健康的干预措施:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 12;17(20):7405. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207405.
6
Interventions for improving the research literacy of nurses: a systematic review.提高护士研究素养的干预措施:一项系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):256-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2378.
7
The effect of mobile application interventions on influencing healthy maternal behaviour and improving perinatal health outcomes: a systematic review protocol.移动应用程序干预对影响孕产妇健康行为和改善围产期健康结局的作用:一项系统评价方案
Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 8;6(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0424-8.
8
9
The WHO antenatal care randomised controlled trial: rationale and study design.世界卫生组织产前护理随机对照试验:原理与研究设计。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998 Oct;12 Suppl 2:27-58. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.00006.x.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Health literacy and its determinants among pregnant women in Portugal.葡萄牙孕妇的健康素养及其决定因素。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Aug 29;25(1):2963. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24225-7.
2
Impact of the Flo Cycle Tracking App on menstrual knowledge and health in low-income and middle-income countries: a longitudinal study.Flo周期追踪应用程序对低收入和中等收入国家女性月经知识及健康状况的影响:一项纵向研究
BMJ Public Health. 2025 Aug 19;3(2):e002822. doi: 10.1136/bmjph-2025-002822. eCollection 2025.
3
Exploring Empowerment in Group Antenatal Care: Insights from an Insider and Outsider Perspective.
探索集体产前护理中的赋权:来自内部人士和外部人士视角的见解。
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 7;13(15):1930. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13151930.
4
Association between maternal-infant health literacy, social support, and psychological stress during the perinatal period among women in Macao, China.中国澳门地区围产期女性母婴健康素养、社会支持与心理压力之间的关联
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251347086. doi: 10.1177/17455057251347086. Epub 2025 Jun 17.
5
The Impact of Robot-Assisted Digital Education on Prenatal Women's Health Literacy: A Randomized Controlled Trial.机器人辅助数字教育对孕妇健康素养的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Nurs Manag. 2025 Jun 5;2025:8865606. doi: 10.1155/jonm/8865606. eCollection 2025.
6
Impact of health literacy and subjective happiness in pregnancy on neonatal anthropometry: a cohort study.孕期健康素养和主观幸福感对新生儿人体测量学的影响:一项队列研究。
Discov Ment Health. 2025 Apr 24;5(1):60. doi: 10.1007/s44192-025-00192-8.
7
Assessing the Quality of Life of Pregnant Women in Romania: Socioeconomic, Health, and Obstetric Factors and the Validation of the WHOQOL-BREF Instrument.评估罗马尼亚孕妇的生活质量:社会经济、健康和产科因素以及世界卫生组织生活质量简表(WHOQOL-BREF)的效度验证
Nurs Rep. 2025 Feb 26;15(3):78. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15030078.
8
Predicting the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile of Pregnant Women Based on Their Health Literacy Levels: A Cross-Sectional Study.基于健康素养水平预测孕妇的健康促进生活方式概况:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2025 Jan;12(1):e70136. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70136.
9
Health literacy interventions for pregnant women with limited language proficiency in the country they live in: a systematic review.在居住国,针对语言能力有限的孕妇的健康素养干预措施:系统评价。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Nov 26;24(1):3287. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20747-8.
10
Health Literacy Levels of Women Attending a Perinatology Outpatient Clinic for High-Risk Pregnancy Follow-Up.在围产医学门诊接受高危妊娠随访的女性的健康素养水平
Cureus. 2024 Aug 31;16(8):e68267. doi: 10.7759/cureus.68267. eCollection 2024 Aug.