Univ. Department Otorhinolaryngology, Head & Neck Surgery, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium.
Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium.
Sci Rep. 2020 Feb 24;10(1):3340. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-58648-6.
Although the spiral anatomy of the human cochlea seems evident, measuring the highly inter-variable true dimensions is still challenging. Today, only a few three-dimensional reconstruction models of the inner ear are available. Previously, spiral equations were applied to two-dimensional computed tomography (CT) images to predict the electrode insertion depth prior to cochlear implantation. The study aimed primarily to compare the clinical applicability of two analytical cochlear models using a recently introduced planning software to predict the insertion depth of the electrode array of 46 cochlear implant recipients. One was based upon the Escudé formula, which relies only on the basal turn diameter, and another based upon the Elliptic-Circular Approximation (ECA), using the diameter and width. Each case was measured twice by two ENT surgeons. Secondly, in order to measure the benefit of the new planning software over the use of the existing clinical routine method, the results were compared to the prediction based upon a two-dimensional CT image. The intra -and inter-observer agreement using the planning software was significantly better when the ECA was applied, compared to the Escudé formula (p < 0.01). As a reference, the predicted insertion depth was compared to the actual insertion depth measured on post-operative images. The mean absolute error was |2.36| (|1.11|) mm in case of the Escudé approach and |1.19| (|0.92|) mm in case of the ECA. The use of a new planning software that allows three-dimensional handling, integrating the diameter and width of the basal turn (ECA formula), resulted in the most accurate predictions of the electrode insertion depths.
尽管人类耳蜗的螺旋解剖结构似乎显而易见,但测量高度变量的真实尺寸仍然具有挑战性。如今,仅有少数内耳的三维重建模型可用。以前,螺旋方程被应用于二维计算机断层扫描(CT)图像,以预测人工耳蜗植入前的电极插入深度。本研究的主要目的是使用最近推出的规划软件,比较两种分析耳蜗模型的临床适用性,以预测 46 名人工耳蜗植入接受者的电极阵列插入深度。一种基于 Escudé 公式,仅依赖于基底回直径,另一种基于椭圆-圆形逼近(ECA),使用直径和宽度。每位患者由两名耳鼻喉科医生进行了两次测量。其次,为了测量新规划软件相对于使用现有临床常规方法的优势,将结果与基于二维 CT 图像的预测进行了比较。与 Escudé 公式相比,当使用 ECA 时,规划软件的内部和观察者之间的一致性明显更好(p<0.01)。作为参考,将预测的插入深度与术后图像上测量的实际插入深度进行了比较。Escudé 方法的平均绝对误差为 |2.36|(|1.11|)mm,ECA 方法的平均绝对误差为 |1.19|(|0.92|)mm。使用允许三维处理、整合基底回直径和宽度的新规划软件(ECA 公式),可实现电极插入深度的最准确预测。