Department of Biology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Nat Ecol Evol. 2020 Mar;4(3):479-486. doi: 10.1038/s41559-020-1113-x. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
Group-living species show a diversity of social organization, from simple mated pairs to complex communities of interdependent individuals performing specialized tasks. The advantages of living in cooperative groups are well understood, but why some species breed in small aggregations while others evolve large, complex groups with clearly divided roles is unclear. We address this problem by reconstructing the evolutionary pathways to cooperative breeding across 4,730 bird species. We show that differences in the way groups form at the origin of cooperative breeding predicts the level of group complexity that emerges. Groups that originate through the retention of offspring have a clear reproductive divide with distinct breeder and helper roles. This is associated with reproductive specialization, where breeders invest more in fecundity and less in care. In contrast, groups formed through the aggregation of unrelated adults are smaller and lack specialization. These results help explain why some species have not transitioned beyond simple groups while others have taken the pathway to increased group complexity.
群居物种表现出多样化的社会组织形式,从简单的配对繁殖到复杂的、具有相互依存关系的个体群体,这些个体群体执行着专门的任务。生活在合作群体中的优势是显而易见的,但为什么有些物种繁殖成小的群体,而有些物种则进化成具有明确分工的大型、复杂的群体,这一点还不清楚。我们通过重建 4730 种鸟类的合作繁殖的进化途径来解决这个问题。我们表明,合作繁殖起源时群体形成方式的差异,预示着群体复杂性的发展水平。通过保留后代而形成的群体具有明显的生殖分工,存在明确的繁殖者和帮手角色。这与生殖专业化有关,其中繁殖者在繁殖上投入更多,在养育上投入更少。相比之下,通过聚集无关的成年个体形成的群体则较小,且缺乏专业化。这些结果有助于解释为什么有些物种没有从简单的群体进化为更复杂的群体,而有些物种则走上了增加群体复杂性的道路。