Piraka Cyrus, Saeed Ahmed, Waljee Akbar K, Pillai Ajish, Stidham Ryan, Elmunzer B Joseph
Division of Gastroenterology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan, United States.
VA Center for Clinical Management Research, VA Ann Arbor Health Care System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States; Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States.
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Mar;5(3):E184-E189. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-101696.
Colonic polyps > 1 cm in size are commonly managed using hot polypectomy techniques. The most frequent adverse events (delayed bleeding, post-polypectomy syndrome, and perforation) are related to electrocautery-induced injury. We hypothesized that cold resection of large polyps may have similar efficacy and improved safety compared to hot polypectomy. Our aims were to evaluate efficacy and safety of piecemeal cold snare resection of colonic polyps > 1 cm. Patients undergoing lift and piecemeal cold snare polypectomy of non-pedunculated colon polyps > 1 cm from October 2013 to September 2015 were identified retrospectively. Efficacy was defined by the absence of residual adenomatous tissue at endoscopic follow-up. Adverse events (AEs), including post-procedural bleeding, bowel perforation, or post-procedural pain requiring hospitalization were assessed by chart review and telephone follow-up. Seventy-three patients underwent piecemeal cold snare polypectomy for 94 colon polyps > 1 cm with 56 of 73 patients completing follow-up on 72 polyps. Residual or recurrent adenoma was found in 7 cases (9.7 %). Median polyp size was significantly greater in those with residual/recurrent adenoma (37.1 vs. 19.1 mm, < .0001). There were no AEs among all 73 patients enrolled. Piecemeal cold snare resection of colon polyps > 1 cm is feasible, safe and efficacious when compared to published hot polypectomy data. Additional observational and randomized comparative effectiveness studies are necessary to demonstrate comparable adenoma eradication and improved safety advantage over existing hot snare polypectomy techniques.
对于直径大于1厘米的结肠息肉,通常采用热息肉切除术进行处理。最常见的不良事件(延迟出血、息肉切除术后综合征和穿孔)与电灼引起的损伤有关。我们推测,与热息肉切除术相比,大息肉的冷切除可能具有相似的疗效和更高的安全性。我们的目的是评估直径大于1厘米的结肠息肉逐块冷圈套切除术的疗效和安全性。对2013年10月至2015年9月期间接受非带蒂结肠息肉(直径大于1厘米)抬举和逐块冷圈套息肉切除术的患者进行回顾性分析。疗效定义为内镜随访时无残留腺瘤组织。通过病历审查和电话随访评估不良事件(AE),包括术后出血、肠穿孔或需要住院治疗的术后疼痛。73例患者对94个直径大于1厘米的结肠息肉进行了逐块冷圈套息肉切除术,73例患者中的56例对72个息肉完成了随访。7例(9.7%)发现残留或复发性腺瘤。残留/复发性腺瘤患者的息肉中位大小明显更大(37.1对19.1毫米,<0.0001)。所有73例入组患者均未发生不良事件。与已发表的热息肉切除术数据相比,直径大于1厘米的结肠息肉逐块冷圈套切除术是可行、安全且有效的。需要进行更多的观察性和随机对照有效性研究,以证明与现有的热圈套息肉切除术相比,腺瘤根除效果相当且安全性更高。