• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

制药行业的数据完整性:对 2007-2018 财年生物研究监测计划发布的检查和警告信的分析。

Data Integrity in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Analysis of Inspections and Warning Letters Issued by the Bioresearch Monitoring Program Between Fiscal Years 2007-2018.

机构信息

Department of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Georgia, 250 West Green Street, Athens, GA, 30602, USA.

Pharmaceutical and Medical Devices, Engineering Systems, Inc, Norcross, GA, USA.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;54(5):1123-1133. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00129-z. Epub 2020 Feb 24.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-020-00129-z
PMID:32096103
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7993007/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Warning Letters issued by the Food and Drug Administration's Bioresearch Monitoring (BIMO) Program provide insight into data integrity issues and other research misconduct in the premarket side of the pharmaceutical industry. The objectives of this study were to understand the common compliance issues for clinical investigators, institutional review boards, sponsors of clinical studies, good laboratory practice laboratories, and bioequivalence studies and to see how compliance has changed over time.

METHODS

Warning letters and closeout letters issued by the BIMO program between US fiscal years 2007-2018 were analyzed by categorizing regulatory violations into violation themes. Inspections during the same time period were analyzed based on the assigned inspection classification.

RESULTS

A combined total of 300 warning letters were analyzed as a part of this study. The most common violations found in all warning letter categories included failing to follow and maintain procedures and poor documentation practices. Inspection results show that overall the percentage of Official Action Indicated results has decreased over time, while the percentage of No Action Indicated results has increased.

CONCLUSION

Although the number of warning letters has decreased over the past decade and inspection results have been improving, there are still significant data integrity and other regulatory compliance issues found in the premarket side of the pharmaceutical industry. It is unclear if the reduction of warning letters is due to improved compliance in the industry or other factors unrelated to compliance.

摘要

背景

美国食品和药物管理局生物研究监测(BIMO)计划发布的警告信提供了对制药行业上市前数据完整性问题和其他研究不端行为的深入了解。本研究的目的是了解临床研究者、机构审查委员会、临床研究赞助商、良好实验室规范实验室和生物等效性研究的常见合规问题,并观察合规情况随时间的变化。

方法

通过将监管违规行为归类为违规主题,对 BIMO 计划在 2007 年至 2018 年财政年度发布的警告信和结案信进行了分析。同时根据分配的检查分类对同期的检查进行了分析。

结果

作为本研究的一部分,共分析了 300 封警告信。在所有警告信类别中发现的最常见违规行为包括未能遵循和维护程序以及文件记录不良。检查结果表明,总体而言,一段时间以来,有官方行动指示结果的百分比有所下降,而无行动指示结果的百分比有所增加。

结论

尽管过去十年警告信的数量有所减少,检查结果也有所改善,但制药行业上市前仍存在严重的数据完整性和其他监管合规问题。目前尚不清楚警告信数量的减少是由于行业合规性的提高还是与合规性无关的其他因素。

相似文献

1
Data Integrity in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Analysis of Inspections and Warning Letters Issued by the Bioresearch Monitoring Program Between Fiscal Years 2007-2018.制药行业的数据完整性:对 2007-2018 财年生物研究监测计划发布的检查和警告信的分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;54(5):1123-1133. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00129-z. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
2
Analysis of warning letters issued by the US Food and Drug Administration to clinical investigators, institutional review boards and sponsors: a retrospective study.美国食品药品监督管理局向临床研究人员、机构审查委员会和申办者发出的警告信分析:一项回顾性研究
J Med Ethics. 2015 May;41(5):398-403. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101829. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
3
A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Research Misconduct Using FDA-Issued Warning Letters and Clinical Investigator Inspection List From 2010 to 2014.2010 年至 2014 年期间,使用 FDA 发布的警告信和临床研究者检查清单对临床研究不当行为进行回顾性分析。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):976-982. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002694.
4
Research Misconduct in FDA-Regulated Clinical Trials: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Warning Letters and Disqualification Proceedings.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)监管的临床试验中的研究不当行为:对警告信和取消资格程序的横断面分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Sep;52(5):592-605. doi: 10.1177/2168479017749514. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
5
An FDA Analysis of Inspected Entities After Receiving Official Action Indicated Letters for Good Clinical Practice Violations.收到临床实验违规官方行动指示函后,FDA 对受检实体的分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Sep;55(5):907-917. doi: 10.1007/s43441-021-00267-y. Epub 2021 Jun 8.
6
A study of warning letters issued to institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration.一项关于美国食品药品监督管理局发给机构审查委员会警告信的研究。
Clin Invest Med. 2004 Dec;27(6):316-23.
7
A study of warning letters issued to clinical investigators by the United States Food and Drug Administration.一项关于美国食品药品监督管理局发给临床研究人员的警告信的研究。
Clin Invest Med. 2004 Jun;27(3):129-34.
8
Over-the-Counter Drugs: Regulatory Analysis of Warning Letters Between Fiscal Years 2015-2019.非处方药:2015-2019 财年警示信的监管分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2021 Mar;55(2):426-436. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00231-2. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
9
Research Deviations in FDA-Regulated Clinical Trials: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of FDA Inspection Citations.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)监管的临床试验中的研究偏差:对FDA检查引用情况的横断面分析
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Sep;52(5):579-591. doi: 10.1177/2168479017751405. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
10
Analysis of FDA Warning Letters Issued to Indian Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Companies: A Retrospective Study.分析美国 FDA 发给印度制药和医疗器械公司的警告信:一项回顾性研究。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Jul;54(4):925-931. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00109-y. Epub 2020 Jan 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of a Pilot: Inspection Facilitation and Collaboration Using a Mixed Reality Device.试点评估:使用混合现实设备进行检查促进和协作。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Jan;58(1):11-15. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00594-2. Epub 2023 Nov 22.
2
Comparative Effectiveness of eConsent: Systematic Review.电子知情同意的比较效果:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Sep 1;25:e43883. doi: 10.2196/43883.
3
FDA Warning Letters: A Retrospective Analysis of Letters Issued to Pharmaceutical Companies from 2010-2020.美国食品药品监督管理局警示信:对2010年至2020年期间发给制药公司的警示信的回顾性分析
J Pharm Innov. 2022 Aug 15:1-10. doi: 10.1007/s12247-022-09678-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Research Misconduct in FDA-Regulated Clinical Trials: A Cross-sectional Analysis of Warning Letters and Disqualification Proceedings.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)监管的临床试验中的研究不当行为:对警告信和取消资格程序的横断面分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Sep;52(5):592-605. doi: 10.1177/2168479017749514. Epub 2018 Jan 31.
2
Analysis of warning letters issued by the US Food and Drug Administration to clinical investigators, institutional review boards and sponsors: a retrospective study.美国食品药品监督管理局向临床研究人员、机构审查委员会和申办者发出的警告信分析:一项回顾性研究
J Med Ethics. 2015 May;41(5):398-403. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101829. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
3
A study of warning letters issued to clinical investigators and institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration.美国食品药品监督管理局发给临床研究人员和机构审查委员会的警告信研究。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2011 Oct-Dec;8(4):211-4. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2011.082.
4
A study of warning letters issued to institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration.一项关于美国食品药品监督管理局发给机构审查委员会警告信的研究。
Clin Invest Med. 2004 Dec;27(6):316-23.
5
A study of warning letters issued to clinical investigators by the United States Food and Drug Administration.一项关于美国食品药品监督管理局发给临床研究人员的警告信的研究。
Clin Invest Med. 2004 Jun;27(3):129-34.