• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国食品药品监督管理局向临床研究人员、机构审查委员会和申办者发出的警告信分析:一项回顾性研究

Analysis of warning letters issued by the US Food and Drug Administration to clinical investigators, institutional review boards and sponsors: a retrospective study.

作者信息

Shetty Yashashri C, Saiyed Aafreen A

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Seth GS Medical College, KEM Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2015 May;41(5):398-403. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101829. Epub 2014 Jun 25.

DOI:10.1136/medethics-2013-101829
PMID:24965716
Abstract

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issues warning letters to all research stakeholders if unacceptable deficiencies are found during site visits. Warning letters issued by the FDA between January 2011 and December 2012 to clinical investigators and institutional review boards (IRBs) were reviewed for various violation themes and compared to similar studies in the past. Warning letters issued to sponsors between January 2005 and December 2012 were analysed for the first time for a specific set of violations using descriptive statistics. Failure to protect subject safety and to report adverse events to IRBs was found to be significant compared to prior studies for clinical investigators, while failure to follow standard operating procedures and maintain documentation was noted as significant in warning letters to IRBs. Failure to maintain minutes of meeting and to follow written procedures for continuing review were new substantial violations in warning letters issued to IRBs. Forty-six warning letters were issued to sponsors, the most common violations being failure to follow a monitoring schedule (58.69%), failure to obtain investigator agreement (34.78%), failure to secure investigators' compliance (30.43%), and failure to maintain data records and ship documents to investigators (30.43%). Appropriate methods for handling clinical trial procedural violations should be developed and implemented worldwide.

摘要

如果在现场检查中发现不可接受的缺陷,美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)会向所有研究相关方发出警告信。对FDA在2011年1月至2012年12月期间发给临床研究人员和机构审查委员会(IRB)的警告信进行了审查,以分析各种违规主题,并与过去的类似研究进行比较。首次使用描述性统计方法对2005年1月至2012年12月期间发给申办方的警告信中一组特定违规行为进行了分析。结果发现,与之前针对临床研究人员的研究相比,未能保护受试者安全以及未向IRB报告不良事件的情况较为严重,而在发给IRB的警告信中,未遵循标准操作规程和未保留文件记录被视为严重问题。未能保存会议记录以及未遵循书面程序进行持续审查是发给IRB的警告信中出现的新的重大违规行为。共向申办方发出了46封警告信,最常见的违规行为包括未遵循监查计划(58.69%)、未获得研究人员同意(34.78%)、未确保研究人员合规(30.43%)以及未保存数据记录并向研究人员发送文件(30.43%)。应在全球范围内制定并实施处理临床试验程序违规行为的适当方法。

相似文献

1
Analysis of warning letters issued by the US Food and Drug Administration to clinical investigators, institutional review boards and sponsors: a retrospective study.美国食品药品监督管理局向临床研究人员、机构审查委员会和申办者发出的警告信分析:一项回顾性研究
J Med Ethics. 2015 May;41(5):398-403. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2013-101829. Epub 2014 Jun 25.
2
A study of warning letters issued to institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration.一项关于美国食品药品监督管理局发给机构审查委员会警告信的研究。
Clin Invest Med. 2004 Dec;27(6):316-23.
3
A study of warning letters issued to clinical investigators and institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration.美国食品药品监督管理局发给临床研究人员和机构审查委员会的警告信研究。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2011 Oct-Dec;8(4):211-4. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2011.082.
4
A study of warning letters issued to clinical investigators by the United States Food and Drug Administration.一项关于美国食品药品监督管理局发给临床研究人员的警告信的研究。
Clin Invest Med. 2004 Jun;27(3):129-34.
5
An audit of US FDA warning letters issued to sponsors, institutional review boards and investigators over a six-year period.对美国 FDA 在六年期间发给赞助商、机构审查委员会和研究者的警告信进行审核。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2022 Apr-Jun;VII(2):108-113. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2021.094.
6
A Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Research Misconduct Using FDA-Issued Warning Letters and Clinical Investigator Inspection List From 2010 to 2014.2010 年至 2014 年期间,使用 FDA 发布的警告信和临床研究者检查清单对临床研究不当行为进行回顾性分析。
Anesth Analg. 2018 Mar;126(3):976-982. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002694.
7
Data Integrity in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Analysis of Inspections and Warning Letters Issued by the Bioresearch Monitoring Program Between Fiscal Years 2007-2018.制药行业的数据完整性:对 2007-2018 财年生物研究监测计划发布的检查和警告信的分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;54(5):1123-1133. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00129-z. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
8
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
9
Analysis of FDA Warning Letters Issued to Indian Pharmaceutical and Medical Device Companies: A Retrospective Study.分析美国 FDA 发给印度制药和医疗器械公司的警告信:一项回顾性研究。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Jul;54(4):925-931. doi: 10.1007/s43441-019-00109-y. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
10
A review of FDA warning letters and notices of violation issued for patient-reported outcomes promotional claims between 2006 and 2012.对 2006 年至 2012 年间因患者报告结局促销声明而发布的 FDA 警告信和违规通知进行回顾。
Value Health. 2014 Jun;17(4):433-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.03.1718.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative study to evaluate quality of data documentation between investigator-initiated and pharmaceutical industry-sponsored studies.一项评估研究者发起的研究与制药行业赞助的研究之间数据记录质量的比较研究。
Perspect Clin Res. 2020 Jan-Mar;11(1):13-17. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_122_18. Epub 2019 May 14.
2
Data Integrity in the Pharmaceutical Industry: Analysis of Inspections and Warning Letters Issued by the Bioresearch Monitoring Program Between Fiscal Years 2007-2018.制药行业的数据完整性:对 2007-2018 财年生物研究监测计划发布的检查和警告信的分析。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2020 Sep;54(5):1123-1133. doi: 10.1007/s43441-020-00129-z. Epub 2020 Feb 24.
3
Design, implementation, and evaluation of PINDAR, a novel short program on GCP for academic medical center principal investigators conducting human subject research.
为开展人体受试者研究的学术医学中心主要研究者设计、实施并评估一项关于《药物临床试验质量管理规范》(GCP)的新型简短培训项目PINDAR。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Dec;2(6):343-349. doi: 10.1017/cts.2019.5.
4
An Audit of Protocol Deviations Submitted to an Institutional Ethics Committee of a Tertiary Care Hospital.提交给一家三级护理医院机构伦理委员会的方案偏差审核
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 6;11(1):e0146334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146334. eCollection 2016.