Kathleen Long is a Perinatal Clinical Nurse Specialist, Kaiser Permanente, Southern California Anaheim Medical Center, Anaheim, CA. The author can be reached via e-mail at
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2020 Mar/Apr;45(2):110-115. doi: 10.1097/NMC.0000000000000606.
The purpose of this study was to determine if changing the timing of the initial newborn bath would have an impact on exclusive breastfeeding during hospitalization. The first newborn bath had been routinely done within 2 hours of age; practice was changed to the first bath being delayed until at least 12 hours of age. A secondary purpose was to examine the nurses' perceived benefits and challenges to such a change.
Through a retrospective design, exclusive breastfeeding rates among mother-infant couplets prepractice change (cohort A) were compared with two postchange cohorts (B and C). Cohorts B and C were from the first 5 months and second 5 months, respectively after the practice change. Demographic information, birth type, bath timing, and feeding data were collected. Comparative statistics were applied to the three cohorts to examine differences in exclusive breastfeeding rates. Postpartum nurses were asked two open-ended questions on concerns and benefits of this change via an anonymous survey. Content analysis was completed on responses.
There were 1,463 mother-infant couplets included in three cohorts (A: n = 564; B: n = 468; C: n = 431). There were no significant increases in the exclusive breastfeeding rates (baseline 74.1%) in both the first postimplementation delayed bath cohort (70.1%, p = .207) and the second "sustainability" cohort (79.4%, p = .060). Fifteen of the 60 postpartum nurses completed the survey, for a response rate of 25%. Themes generated from survey responses included concerns (infection control, work distribution), as well as benefits (perceived breastfeeding success, decreased workload) with delaying the first newborn bath.
Delaying the first newborn bath may be one factor that can influence exclusive breastfeeding rates during postpartum hospitalization. Results have been mixed based on recent literature. In our study, the exclusive breastfeeding rate was already above average, as would be expected in a Baby-Friendly designated hospital and may be a reason we did not see a significant change in the rate among mother-infant couplets in our study. Randomized trials are needed for a rigorous evaluation of timing of the newborn bath and possible link to exclusive breastfeeding in the hospital and beyond.
本研究旨在确定改变新生儿最初沐浴时间是否会对住院期间的纯母乳喂养产生影响。最初的新生儿沐浴通常在出生后 2 小时内进行;实践改为至少在 12 小时后进行第一次沐浴。次要目的是检查护士对这种改变的感知益处和挑战。
通过回顾性设计,比较了实践改变前(A 队列)和改变后两个队列(B 和 C)的母婴对纯母乳喂养率。B 和 C 队列分别来自实践改变后的前 5 个月和后 5 个月。收集了人口统计学信息、分娩类型、沐浴时间和喂养数据。对这三个队列进行了比较统计学分析,以检查纯母乳喂养率的差异。通过匿名调查,向产后护士提出了两个关于这一变化的关注点和益处的开放式问题。对回答进行了内容分析。
共有 1463 对母婴纳入三个队列(A:n=564;B:n=468;C:n=431)。在第一个实施延迟沐浴的队列中(70.1%,p=0.207)和第二个“可持续性”队列中(79.4%,p=0.060),纯母乳喂养率均无显著增加(基线 74.1%)。在 60 名产后护士中,有 15 名完成了调查,回复率为 25%。从调查回复中生成的主题包括对延迟第一次新生儿沐浴的担忧(感染控制、工作分配),以及益处(感知母乳喂养成功、减少工作量)。
延迟第一次新生儿沐浴可能是影响产后住院期间纯母乳喂养率的一个因素。根据最近的文献,结果喜忧参半。在我们的研究中,纯母乳喂养率已经高于平均水平,这在婴儿友好指定医院中是可以预期的,这可能也是我们在研究中没有看到母婴对纯母乳喂养率显著变化的原因之一。需要进行随机试验,以严格评估新生儿沐浴时间与医院内外纯母乳喂养的可能联系。