Suppr超能文献

男性 HIV 感染者肛门癌筛查中的种族差异:一项临床队列研究的结果。

Racial Disparities in Anal Cancer Screening Among Men Living With HIV: Findings From a Clinical Cohort Study.

机构信息

Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2020 Jul 1;84(3):295-303. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002335.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to quantify the extent of anal cancer screening among men receiving HIV specialty care in Ontario, Canada, and evaluate factors associated with screening.

SETTING

Cross-sectional questionnaire within a multisite clinical HIV cohort.

METHODS

A questionnaire assessing knowledge and experience with human papillomavirus-associated diseases and their prevention was administered in 2016-2017 to 1677 men in the Ontario HIV Treatment Network Cohort Study. We used logistic regression to identify factors associated with having discussed screening with a health care provider and self-reported receipt of screening [digital anal rectal examinations (DARE); anal cytology or anoscopy]. Results reported as adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Forty percent of men reported ever having had anal cytology/anoscopy, and 70% had ever had DARE. After accounting for differences in age, sexual orientation, years since HIV diagnosis, previous diagnosis with AIDS, knowing someone with human papillomavirus-associated cancer, comfort discussing anal health, education, and income, the proportion screened differed by self-identified race. Compared with white men, Asian men were less likely to have discussed screening with a health care provider (aOR = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.29 to 0.80) or to have been screened by DARE (aOR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.17 to 0.44) or anal cytology/anoscopy (aOR = 0.51; 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.83), and African, Caribbean, or black men (aOR = 0.47; 95% CI: 0.31 to 0.70) were less likely to have had DARE. Results were consistent when restricting the analyses to gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men.

CONCLUSION

Our findings highlight the potential for disparities in anal cancer screening that need to be considered when developing guidelines and screening programs to reduce the burden of anal cancer among men living with HIV and ensure health equity.

摘要

背景

我们的目的是量化加拿大安大略省接受艾滋病毒专科护理的男性中肛门癌筛查的程度,并评估与筛查相关的因素。

地点

多地点临床艾滋病毒队列内的横断面问卷调查。

方法

2016-2017 年,在安大略省艾滋病毒治疗网络队列研究中,向 1677 名男性发放了一份评估人乳头瘤病毒相关疾病及其预防知识和经验的问卷。我们使用逻辑回归来确定与卫生保健提供者讨论筛查和自我报告接受筛查[数字肛门直肠检查(DARE);肛门细胞学或肛门镜检查]相关的因素。报告的结果为调整后的优势比(aOR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)。

结果

40%的男性报告曾进行过肛门细胞学/肛门镜检查,70%的男性曾进行过 DARE。在考虑了年龄、性取向、艾滋病毒诊断后年限、既往艾滋病诊断、认识有人患有人乳头瘤病毒相关癌症、讨论肛门健康的舒适度、教育程度和收入等差异后,筛查比例因自我认定的种族而异。与白人男性相比,亚裔男性与卫生保健提供者讨论筛查的可能性较低(aOR=0.48;95%CI:0.29 至 0.80),接受 DARE(aOR=0.27;95%CI:0.17 至 0.44)或肛门细胞学/肛门镜检查(aOR=0.51;95%CI:0.31 至 0.83)的可能性也较低,非裔、加勒比或黑人男性(aOR=0.47;95%CI:0.31 至 0.70)接受 DARE 的可能性也较低。当将分析仅限于男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性关系的男性时,结果仍然一致。

结论

我们的研究结果强调了在制定指南和筛查计划以减少艾滋病毒感染者肛门癌负担和确保健康公平时,需要考虑肛门癌筛查方面存在的差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验