Comparison Between the eyeWatch Device and the Ahmed Valve in Refractory Glaucoma.

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of a glaucoma procedure to control intraocular pressure (IOP) using the adjustable eyeWatch glaucoma drainage device compared with Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) in refractory glaucoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Monocentric, retrospective, comparative clinical trial. Patients suffering from refractory glaucoma after failed surgeries and requiring a further glaucoma procedure including an aqueous shunt were enrolled in this study. The first group AGV included patients with an AGV. The second group eW-B included patients receiving an eyeWatch used in connection with a Baerveldt glaucoma implant. The primary outcome was the success rate, defined as an IOP≤16 mm Hg and reduction of >20% from baseline, and IOP≥5 mm Hg. Secondary outcomes were mean IOP, number of antiglaucoma medications, visual acuity, number and type of complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included. The mean follow-up time was 13.2±3.4 months. Mean IOP decreased from 24.8±9.0 mm Hg before surgery to 13.8±3.6 mm Hg at 12 months for group AGV, and 27.3±7.0 to 12.8±2.4 mm Hg for group eW-B, respectively (P<0.05). Mean number of glaucoma medications decreased from 3.0±0.7 before surgery to 0.3±0.7 at last control for group AGV, and 2.9±0.8 before surgery to 0.2±0.4 for group eW-B, respectively (P<0.05). The complete and overall success rates were 50% and 58% for group AGV, and 67% and 89% for group eW-B, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The postoperative adjustability of the eyeWatch is believed to help with getting fewer complications and better IOP management whereas AGV cannot be adjusted postoperatively.