• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

眼动仪设备与 Ahmed 阀在难治性青光眼中的比较。

Comparison Between the eyeWatch Device and the Ahmed Valve in Refractory Glaucoma.

机构信息

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology.

Glaucoma Center, Montchoisi Clinic, Lausanne.

出版信息

J Glaucoma. 2020 May;29(5):401-405. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001471.

DOI:10.1097/IJG.0000000000001471
PMID:32097256
Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy and safety of a glaucoma procedure to control intraocular pressure (IOP) using the adjustable eyeWatch glaucoma drainage device compared with Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) in refractory glaucoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Monocentric, retrospective, comparative clinical trial. Patients suffering from refractory glaucoma after failed surgeries and requiring a further glaucoma procedure including an aqueous shunt were enrolled in this study. The first group AGV included patients with an AGV. The second group eW-B included patients receiving an eyeWatch used in connection with a Baerveldt glaucoma implant. The primary outcome was the success rate, defined as an IOP≤16 mm Hg and reduction of >20% from baseline, and IOP≥5 mm Hg. Secondary outcomes were mean IOP, number of antiglaucoma medications, visual acuity, number and type of complications.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients were included. The mean follow-up time was 13.2±3.4 months. Mean IOP decreased from 24.8±9.0 mm Hg before surgery to 13.8±3.6 mm Hg at 12 months for group AGV, and 27.3±7.0 to 12.8±2.4 mm Hg for group eW-B, respectively (P<0.05). Mean number of glaucoma medications decreased from 3.0±0.7 before surgery to 0.3±0.7 at last control for group AGV, and 2.9±0.8 before surgery to 0.2±0.4 for group eW-B, respectively (P<0.05). The complete and overall success rates were 50% and 58% for group AGV, and 67% and 89% for group eW-B, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The postoperative adjustability of the eyeWatch is believed to help with getting fewer complications and better IOP management whereas AGV cannot be adjusted postoperatively.

摘要

目的

评估可调节的眼 Watch 青光眼引流装置在难治性青光眼中控制眼内压(IOP)的疗效和安全性,与 Ahmed 青光眼阀(AGV)相比。

患者和方法

单中心、回顾性、对照临床试验。患有失败手术后难治性青光眼并需要进一步青光眼手术(包括房水分流术)的患者被纳入本研究。AGV 组包括接受 AGV 的患者,eW-B 组包括接受与 Baerveldt 青光眼植入物联合使用的眼 Watch 的患者。主要结局是成功率,定义为 IOP≤16mmHg 且较基线降低>20%,以及 IOP≥5mmHg。次要结局是平均 IOP、抗青光眼药物数量、视力、并发症的数量和类型。

结果

共纳入 21 例患者,平均随访时间为 13.2±3.4 个月。AGV 组手术前平均 IOP 为 24.8±9.0mmHg,手术后 12 个月为 13.8±3.6mmHg,eW-B 组手术前平均 IOP 为 27.3±7.0mmHg,手术后 12 个月为 12.8±2.4mmHg,两组均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。AGV 组手术前平均抗青光眼药物数量为 3.0±0.7 种,最后一次随访时为 0.3±0.7 种,eW-B 组手术前平均抗青光眼药物数量为 2.9±0.8 种,最后一次随访时为 0.2±0.4 种,两组均有统计学差异(P<0.05)。AGV 组完全成功率和总成功率分别为 50%和 58%,eW-B 组分别为 67%和 89%。

结论

眼 Watch 的术后可调节性被认为有助于减少并发症和更好地管理 IOP,而 AGV 术后无法调节。

相似文献

1
Comparison Between the eyeWatch Device and the Ahmed Valve in Refractory Glaucoma.眼动仪设备与 Ahmed 阀在难治性青光眼中的比较。
J Glaucoma. 2020 May;29(5):401-405. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001471.
2
Initial Clinical Results of the eyeWatch: a New Adjustable Glaucoma Drainage Device Used in Refractory Glaucoma Surgery.眼卫士的初步临床结果:一种用于难治性青光眼手术的新型可调式青光眼引流装置。
J Glaucoma. 2019 May;28(5):452-458. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000001209.
3
Treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt Comparison Study after 1 year of follow-up.艾哈迈德·巴伐尔特(Ahmed Baerveldt)比较研究的 1 年随访后治疗结果。
Ophthalmology. 2011 Mar;118(3):443-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.07.016. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
4
Ahmed Versus Baerveldt Glaucoma Drainage Implantation in Patients With Markedly Elevated Intraocular Pressure (≥30 mm Hg).在眼压显著升高(≥30 mmHg)的患者中比较艾哈迈德青光眼引流植入物与贝尔维尔德青光眼引流植入物的效果
J Glaucoma. 2016 Sep;25(9):738-43. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000000515.
5
Long-term outcome of low-cost glaucoma drainage device (Aurolab aqueous drainage implant) compared with Ahmed glaucoma valve.廉价青光眼引流装置(Aurolab 水引流植入物)与 Ahmed 青光眼阀的长期疗效比较。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2020 Apr;104(4):557-562. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-313942. Epub 2019 Jul 4.
6
One-Year Outcomes of the PAUL Glaucoma Implant Compared With the Ahmed Glaucoma Valve for the Treatment of Silicone Oil Glaucoma.PAUL 青光眼植入物与 Ahmed 青光眼引流阀治疗硅油性青光眼的一年疗效比较。
J Glaucoma. 2024 May 1;33(5):310-316. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0000000000002360. Epub 2024 Jan 9.
7
Long-term outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation in refractory glaucomas.艾哈迈德青光眼引流阀植入术治疗难治性青光眼的长期疗效
Am J Ophthalmol. 2007 Dec;144(6):893-900. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2007.07.035. Epub 2007 Oct 4.
8
Five-year treatment outcomes in the Ahmed Baerveldt comparison study.艾哈迈德·贝尔费尔特比较研究中的五年治疗结果。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Feb;122(2):308-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2014.08.043. Epub 2014 Oct 17.
9
Comparison of the New Low-Cost Nonvalved Glaucoma Drainage Device with Ahmed Glaucoma Valve in Refractory Pediatric Glaucoma in Indian Eyes.新型低成本无阀青光眼引流装置与 Ahmed 青光眼阀在印度人儿童难治性青光眼的比较。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2018 Nov-Dec;1(3):167-174. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2018.07.001. Epub 2018 Aug 17.
10
A prospective randomized controlled study of Aurolab aqueous drainage implant versus Ahmed glaucoma valve in refractory glaucoma: A pilot study.前瞻性随机对照研究 Aurolab 水性引流植入物与 Ahmed 青光眼阀治疗难治性青光眼:一项初步研究。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;66(11):1580-1585. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_427_18.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical outcomes of the EyeWatch system: three-year results.EyeWatch系统的临床结果:三年期结果
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1007/s00417-025-06942-2.
2
Short term clinical outcomes of the combined eyeWatch™ implant and eyePlate in refractory glaucoma-a United Kingdom dual centre study.联合使用eyeWatch™植入物和eyePlate治疗难治性青光眼的短期临床结果——一项英国双中心研究
Int Ophthalmol. 2025 Jun 24;45(1):258. doi: 10.1007/s10792-025-03573-8.
3
[Clinical results of the eyeWatch system: 1-year outcomes].
[eyeWatch系统的临床结果:1年随访结果]
Ophthalmologie. 2024 Apr;121(4):298-307. doi: 10.1007/s00347-024-01994-x. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
4
Recent Advancements in Glaucoma Surgery-A Review.青光眼手术的最新进展——综述
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023 Sep 19;10(9):1096. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering10091096.
5
Magnetically actuated glaucoma drainage device for regulating intraocular pressure after implantation.植入后用于调节眼压的磁驱动青光眼引流装置
Microsyst Nanoeng. 2023 Jul 20;9:92. doi: 10.1038/s41378-023-00561-9. eCollection 2023.
6
23G Minimally Invasive Vitrectomy Combined with Glaucoma Drainage Valve Implantation and Phacoemulsification Cataract Extraction for Neovascular Glaucoma Secondary to Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy with Vitreous Hemorrhage.23G 微创玻璃体切除术联合青光眼引流阀植入和超声乳化白内障吸除术治疗增生性糖尿病视网膜病变伴玻璃体积血继发新生血管性青光眼。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Aug 4;2022:7393661. doi: 10.1155/2022/7393661. eCollection 2022.
7
Conventional glaucoma implants and the new MIGS devices: a comprehensive review of current options and future directions.传统青光眼植入物和新型 MIGS 设备:当前选择和未来方向的综合综述。
Eye (Lond). 2021 Dec;35(12):3202-3221. doi: 10.1038/s41433-021-01595-x. Epub 2021 Jun 14.