• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿科过敏反应的诊治方法。

Physicians' Approach to Anaphylaxis in Childhood.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Izmir Tepecik Training and Research Hospital.

Department of Pediatrics, Dr Behcet Uz Children Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

出版信息

Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Dec 1;37(12):e1425-e1428. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002064.

DOI:10.1097/PEC.0000000000002064
PMID:32097380
Abstract

METHODS

A questionnaire form consisting of a total of 18 questions was prepared. Six questions concerned demographic data; 7 questions inquired about physician's knowledge level about treatment of anaphylaxis. In the last part, 5 different case scenarios were given, and their diagnoses and treatments were asked.

RESULTS

A total of 120 physicians participated in the study. Of the participants, 66.7% were residents. The rate of correct answer about dose of epinephrine was 57.5%. The rates of making correct diagnoses in anaphylaxis case scenarios 1, 2, and 3 were 60%, 73.3%, and 91.7%, respectively, whereas epinephrine administration rates were 54%, 67.5%, and 92.5%, respectively. When the answers of all these questions given by the residents and specialists and among physicians who updated and did not update were compared, there were no statistically significant differences except epinephrine administration rate and its route (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study suggest that physicians' knowledge levels were inadequate in making the diagnosis of anaphylaxis, and physicians use epinephrine in conditions without hypotension or an undefined possible/known allergen contact. Information about epinephrine administration was partially correct. It is currently considered to be the simplest measure to have a written anaphylaxis action plan including diagnostic criteria for anaphylaxis.

摘要

方法

编制了一份共 18 个问题的问卷表。其中 6 个问题涉及人口统计学数据;7 个问题询问了医生对过敏反应治疗的知识水平。在最后一部分,给出了 5 个不同的病例场景,并询问了他们的诊断和治疗方法。

结果

共有 120 名医生参与了这项研究。在参与者中,66.7%是住院医师。关于肾上腺素剂量的正确答案率为 57.5%。在过敏反应病例场景 1、2 和 3 中,正确诊断的比例分别为 60%、73.3%和 91.7%,而肾上腺素的给药率分别为 54%、67.5%和 92.5%。当比较住院医师和专家的所有这些问题的答案以及更新和未更新的医生之间的答案时,除了肾上腺素给药率及其途径(P<0.05)外,没有统计学上的显著差异。

结论

当前研究的结果表明,医生在诊断过敏反应方面的知识水平不足,并且在没有低血压或未明确可能/已知过敏原接触的情况下使用肾上腺素。关于肾上腺素给药的信息部分正确。目前,考虑到制定包括过敏反应诊断标准的书面过敏反应行动计划是最简单的措施。

相似文献

1
Physicians' Approach to Anaphylaxis in Childhood.儿科过敏反应的诊治方法。
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021 Dec 1;37(12):e1425-e1428. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000002064.
2
Are general practitioners alert to anaphylaxis diagnosis and treatment?全科医生对过敏反应的诊断和治疗是否警惕?
Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006 Mar;38(3):83-6.
3
Detection and management of Anaphylaxis in children.儿童过敏反应的检测与管理
Rev Chil Pediatr. 2019;90(1):44-51. doi: 10.32641/rchped.v90i1.839. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
4
Evaluation of pediatricians' awareness about anaphylaxis.儿科医生对过敏反应的认知评估。
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023 Oct;27(5 Suppl):53-61. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_202310_34070.
5
Level of Awareness of Certified Non-critical Care Physicians in Diagnosing, Managing, and Disposing Anaphylactic Cases.认证非重症监护医师对过敏性病例的诊断、管理和处置的意识水平。
Med Arch. 2024;78(1):44-50. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2024.78.44-50.
6
Healthcare workers` knowledge level regarding anaphylaxis and usage of epinephrine auto-injectors.医护人员对过敏反应和肾上腺素自动注射器使用的知识水平。
Turk J Pediatr. 2021;63(3):372-383. doi: 10.24953/turkjped.2021.03.004.
7
Pediatrician perspectives on symptom presentation and treatment of acute allergic reactions.儿科医生对急性过敏反应的症状表现和治疗的看法。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Mar;126(3):273-277. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.11.010. Epub 2020 Nov 21.
8
Anaphylaxis knowledge and practice preferences of pediatric emergency medicine physicians: a national survey.儿科急诊医师的过敏反应知识和实践偏好:一项全国性调查。
J Pediatr. 2013 Sep;163(3):841-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.02.050. Epub 2013 Apr 6.
9
Physicians' knowledge regarding epinephrine underuse in anaphylaxis.医生对过敏性反应中肾上腺素使用不足情况的了解。
Asia Pac Allergy. 2020 Oct 22;10(4):e40. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2020.10.e40. eCollection 2020 Oct.
10
Management of pediatric allergic reaction: Practice patterns of Canadian pediatric emergency physicians.小儿过敏反应的管理:加拿大儿科急诊医师的实践模式。
CJEM. 2020 Nov;22(6):802-810. doi: 10.1017/cem.2020.458.

引用本文的文献

1
Level of knowledge among healthcare professionals regarding anaphylaxis.医疗保健专业人员对过敏反应的认知水平。
Asia Pac Allergy. 2022 Oct 27;12(4):e41. doi: 10.5415/apallergy.2022.12.e41. eCollection 2022 Oct.