Suppr超能文献

妇科恶性肿瘤临床试验中新疗法相关毒性的评价。

Evaluation of toxicities related to novel therapy in clinical trials for women with gynecologic cancer.

机构信息

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Cancer. 2020 May 15;126(10):2139-2145. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32783. Epub 2020 Feb 25.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Women with gynecologic cancer may be at increased risk for adverse events (AEs) due to peritoneal disease burden and prior treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, and pelvic radiotherapy). This study compared the toxicity profiles of patients with and without gynecologic cancer enrolled in phase 1 trials.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Institute phase 1 database for all trials enrolling 1 or more patients with gynecologic cancer over 2 decades (1995-2015). Clinical parameters collected included demographics, cancer history, trial information, AEs, and responses. AEs (according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events) were documented for each patient during treatment, and they were counted once and analyzed on the basis of the highest grade and drug attribution. Multiple regression models were used to compare AEs at the baseline and during treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 4269 patients enrolled in 150 trials were divided into 3 groups: 1) women with gynecologic cancer (n = 685), 2) women with nongynecologic cancer (n = 1698), and 3) men with cancer (n = 1886). The median age was 58 years. The mean number of total AEs reported during treatment was highest for women with gynecologic cancer (17.1 vs 14.7 vs 13.5; P < .001), even though they were similar at the baseline (7.0 vs 7.4 vs 7.0; P = .09). The mean number of drug-related AEs was also highest for women with gynecologic cancer (8.3 vs 6.9 vs 6.2; P < .001). Grade 3 to 5 AEs were similar (2.3 vs 2.3 vs 2.1); however, grade 2 AEs were more frequent in women with gynecologic cancer (4.6 vs 3.9 vs 3.5). Treatment discontinuations due to AEs were similar (9% vs 9% vs 10%).

CONCLUSIONS

Women with gynecologic cancer experienced more frequent low-grade AEs during treatment, and this warrants attention to support their symptom burden. Study dose management should be considered for recurrent grade 2 AEs, particularly during continuous therapy.

摘要

背景

由于腹膜疾病负担和既往治疗(手术、化疗和盆腔放疗),妇科癌症患者可能面临更高的不良事件(AE)风险。本研究比较了入组 I 期临床试验的妇科癌症患者和非妇科癌症患者的毒性特征。

方法

这是一项对国立癌症研究所 I 期数据库的回顾性分析,该数据库纳入了过去 20 年(1995-2015 年)中所有入组 1 例或以上妇科癌症患者的临床试验。收集的临床参数包括人口统计学、癌症史、试验信息、AE 和反应。在治疗期间记录每位患者的 AE(根据不良事件常用术语标准),根据最高等级和药物归属进行一次计数和分析。多回归模型用于比较基线和治疗期间的 AE。

结果

共有 4269 名患者入组 150 项试验,分为 3 组:1)妇科癌症患者(n=685),2)非妇科癌症患者(n=1698)和 3)男性癌症患者(n=1886)。中位年龄为 58 岁。治疗期间报告的总 AE 数量中位数最高的是妇科癌症患者(17.1 比 14.7 比 13.5;P<0.001),尽管他们的基线水平相似(7.0 比 7.4 比 7.0;P=0.09)。妇科癌症患者的药物相关 AE 数量也最高(8.3 比 6.9 比 6.2;P<0.001)。3 至 5 级 AE 相似(2.3 比 2.3 比 2.1),但妇科癌症患者的 2 级 AE 更常见(4.6 比 3.9 比 3.5)。因 AE 而停止治疗的比例相似(9%比 9%比 10%)。

结论

妇科癌症患者在治疗期间经历更频繁的低级别 AE,这需要关注以支持其症状负担。应考虑对复发性 2 级 AE 进行剂量管理,特别是在连续治疗期间。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Moving From Mutation to Actionability.从突变到可操作性
Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2018 May 23;38:495-503. doi: 10.1200/EDBK_199665.
7
Patient-reported tolerability of adverse events in phase 1 trials.患者报告的1期试验中不良事件的耐受性。
ESMO Open. 2017 Jun 23;2(2):e000148. doi: 10.1136/esmoopen-2016-000148. eCollection 2017.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验