Pinter Elisabeth, Rainer Bernhard, Czerny Thomas, Riegel Elisabeth, Schilter Benoît, Marin-Kuan Maricel, Tacker Manfred
Department of Applied Life Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, FH Campus Wien, Helmut-Qualtinger-Gasse 2, 1030 Vienna, Austria.
Nestlé Research Center, Route du Jorat 57, 1000 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Foods. 2020 Feb 22;9(2):237. doi: 10.3390/foods9020237.
Non-targeted screening of food contact materials (FCM) for non-intentionally added substances (NIAS) reveals a great number of unknown and unidentified substances present at low concentrations. In the absence of toxicological data, the application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) or of EU Regulation 10/2011 requires methods able to fulfill safety threshold criteria. In this review, mammalian genotoxicity assays are analyzed for their ability to detect DNA-damaging substances at limits of biological detection (LOBD) corresponding to the appropriate safety thresholds.
The ability of the assays to detect genotoxic effects varies greatly between substance classes. Especially for direct-acting mutagens, the assays lacked the ability to detect most DNA reactive substances below the threshold of 10 ppb, making them unsuitable to pick up potential genotoxicants present in FCM migrates. However, suitability for the detection of chromosomal damage or investigation of other modes of action makes them a complementary tool as part of a standard test battery aimed at giving additional information to ensure safety.
improvements are necessary to comply with regulatory thresholds to consider mammalian genotoxicity assays to assess FCM safety.
对食品接触材料(FCM)中的非故意添加物质(NIAS)进行非靶向筛查发现,存在大量低浓度的未知和未鉴定物质。在缺乏毒理学数据的情况下,应用毒理学关注阈值(TTC)或欧盟法规10/2011需要能够满足安全阈值标准的方法。在本综述中,分析了哺乳动物遗传毒性试验在相应安全阈值的生物检测限(LOBD)下检测DNA损伤物质的能力。
不同物质类别之间,这些试验检测遗传毒性效应的能力差异很大。特别是对于直接作用的诱变剂,这些试验无法检测出低于10 ppb阈值的大多数DNA反应性物质,因此不适用于检测FCM迁移物中存在的潜在遗传毒性物质。然而,由于其适用于检测染色体损伤或研究其他作用模式,使其成为标准试验组合的补充工具,旨在提供额外信息以确保安全性。
有必要改进以符合监管阈值,从而考虑使用哺乳动物遗传毒性试验来评估FCM的安全性。