Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Centre Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Jul;49(7):952-959. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Feb 22.
The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the clinical and aesthetic outcomes, and patient satisfaction, following dental implant therapy in cleft patients. Implant survival, changes in marginal bone level, pocket probing depths, plaque and bleeding indices, aesthetics, and patient satisfaction were assessed in 17 alveolar cleft patients and 17 matched controls. At follow-up (mean 72.4±46.4 months), one implant had been lost in the cleft group. Mean marginal bone loss at follow-up was -0.4±0.4mm in cleft patients and -0.2±0.4mm in controls. Aesthetics of the peri-implant soft tissues (pink aesthetic score) were less favourable (P=0.025) in cleft patients (5.0±1.9) than in controls (6.5±1.7), while peri-implant parameters were comparable in the two groups. Overall patient satisfaction was 8.6±0.9 in cleft patients and 8.9±1.1 in controls (P=0.331). In cleft patients, no difference in aesthetics was observed between patients who received additional bone augmentation at 3 months prior to implant placement and those who did not (P=0.092). Dental implant therapy in cleft patients is associated with high implant survival, minor marginal bone loss, healthy peri-implant soft tissues, and high patient satisfaction. Only the aesthetics of the soft tissues was worse in cleft patients compared to augmented non-cleft patients.
本回顾性研究旨在评估牙槽裂患者接受牙种植治疗后的临床和美学效果以及患者满意度。对 17 例牙槽裂患者和 17 例匹配对照者的种植体存活率、边缘骨水平变化、牙周袋探诊深度、菌斑和出血指数、美学效果和患者满意度进行了评估。在随访(平均 72.4±46.4 个月)时,牙槽裂组有 1 个种植体丢失。牙槽裂患者的平均边缘骨丢失在随访时为-0.4±0.4mm,对照组为-0.2±0.4mm。牙槽裂患者种植体周围软组织的美学效果(粉色美学评分)较差(P=0.025),为 5.0±1.9,而对照组为 6.5±1.7,两组的种植体周围参数相似。牙槽裂患者的总体满意度为 8.6±0.9,对照组为 8.9±1.1(P=0.331)。在牙槽裂患者中,接受种植体植入前 3 个月额外骨增量的患者与未接受的患者之间,美学效果无差异(P=0.092)。牙槽裂患者的牙种植治疗具有较高的种植体存活率、较小的边缘骨丧失、健康的种植体周围软组织和较高的患者满意度。与接受骨增量的非牙槽裂患者相比,牙槽裂患者的软组织美观度较差。