Suppr超能文献

新的综合术前腭裂评估对腭裂患者牙种植体成功的影响:一项回顾性研究。

Impact of a new combined preoperative cleft assessment on dental implant success in patients with cleft and palate: a retrospective study.

机构信息

Oral and Maxillo-Facial Surgery Department, Head and Neck Institute, University Hospital of Nice, 30 Avenue Valombrose, 06100, Nice, France.

Paediatric Maxillofacial Surgery and ENT Department, Lenval Hospital, Nice, France.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2022 Mar 15;22(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02040-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Bone height assessment alone is frequently used to guide rehabilitation choice, without consideration for soft tissues or adjacent teeth. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of different preoperative cleft assessments on implant success and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

The study involved a retrospective assessment of records from 40 patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP). The alveolar cleft score (ACS; clinical criteria), interdental alveolar bone height (IABH) score (radiological criteria), patient compliance score (dental hygiene, medical visit observance, and smoking), and a novel combined score (IABH-ACS-Compliance) were assessed from patient records. Patients who required prosthetic tooth rehabilitation in the cleft dental arch space were included. Twenty-six patients (Group 1) were treated with dental implants, and 14 patients (Group 2) selected another prosthetic option (fixed prosthodontics, removal prosthesis), orthodontic space closure, or no rehabilitation. The main outcomes measured were relative implant success (no implant loss involving marginal bone loss ≤ 1.9 mm) for patients treated with dental implant therapy (Group 1) and patient satisfaction for all patients (Groups 1 and 2).

RESULTS

Forty dental implants were placed in the patients in Group 1. Four implants in four patients (Group 1 relative failure, RF) were lost (implant survival rate of 90%) after 36 (± 12.4) months of follow-up. Twenty-two patients who received implants belonged to the relative implant success group (Group 1 RS). The average "IABH-ACS-Compliance" scores were significantly different (p < 0.05): 16.90 ± 2.35 and 12.75 ± 0.43 for the Group 1 RS and RF groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative cleft parameters have an impact on relative implant success and patient satisfaction. The new cleft assessment combined-score ("IABH-ACS-Compliance") allows an accurate selection of cleft cases eligible for dental implants, thereby improving postoperative outcomes.

摘要

背景

单独评估骨高度常被用于指导康复选择,而不考虑软组织或相邻牙齿。本研究旨在评估不同术前裂隙评估对种植体成功和患者满意度的影响。

方法

该研究回顾性评估了 40 例唇腭裂(CLP)患者的记录。从患者记录中评估牙槽裂评分(ACS;临床标准)、牙间牙槽骨高度(IABH)评分(影像学标准)、患者依从性评分(口腔卫生、就诊遵守情况和吸烟)以及新型联合评分(IABH-ACS-Compliance)。纳入需要在裂隙牙弓空间进行义齿修复的患者。26 例患者(第 1 组)接受牙种植治疗,14 例患者(第 2 组)选择另一种义齿选择(固定义齿修复、可摘义齿、正畸间隙关闭或不进行修复)。主要观察指标为接受牙种植治疗的患者(第 1 组)的相对种植体成功率(无种植体丢失,边缘骨丧失≤1.9mm)和所有患者(第 1 组和第 2 组)的患者满意度。

结果

第 1 组患者共植入 40 颗种植体。4 名患者的 4 颗种植体(第 1 组相对失败,RF)在 36(±12.4)个月的随访后丢失(种植体存活率为 90%)。22 名接受种植体的患者属于相对种植体成功组(第 1 组 RS)。两组间“IABH-ACS-Compliance”评分差异有统计学意义(p<0.05):第 1 组 RS 和 RF 组分别为 16.90±2.35 和 12.75±0.43。

结论

术前裂隙参数对相对种植体成功率和患者满意度有影响。新的裂隙评估综合评分(“IABH-ACS-Compliance”)可准确选择适合牙种植的裂隙病例,从而改善术后结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c737/8925145/8a08f525829b/12903_2022_2040_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验