University of Pittsburgh, 230 South Bouquet Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
J Youth Adolesc. 2020 Oct;49(10):1987-2002. doi: 10.1007/s10964-020-01195-0. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
Mathematics learning, engagement, and performance are facilitated by quality interactions within the classroom environment. Researchers studying high-quality interactions in mathematics classrooms must consider adopting multiple methods of data collection so as to capture classroom quality from all perspectives. As such, this longitudinal study examined student, teacher, and observer perspectives of interaction quality in mathematics classrooms and their predictive associations with mathematics outcomes. Data were collected during the fall and spring semesters of the 2015-2016 school year from 1501 students in 150 mathematics classes (n = 499 fifth graders, 523 seventh graders, 479 ninth graders; 51% female; 51% European American, 30% African American, and 19% other ethnic background; 52% qualifying for free/reduced price lunch). Observer and aggregated student reports of interaction quality at the classroom level were moderately correlated with one another, and these reports predicted student mathematics engagement and performance. Individual student reports of interaction quality also predicted math engagement and performance; yet, teacher reports of interaction quality did not align with student or observer perspectives. Furthermore, teacher reports did not predict student mathematics outcomes. Implications for research, practice, and policy are discussed.
数学学习、参与度和表现受到课堂环境中高质量互动的促进。研究数学课堂中高质量互动的研究人员必须考虑采用多种数据收集方法,以便从各个角度捕捉课堂质量。因此,这项纵向研究考察了学生、教师和观察者对数学课堂互动质量的看法,以及这些看法与数学成果的预测关联。2015-2016 学年秋季和春季学期,从 150 个数学班的 1501 名学生(n=499 名五年级学生、523 名七年级学生、479 名九年级学生;51%女性;51%欧洲裔美国人,30%非裔美国人,19%其他族裔背景;52%符合免费/降价午餐资格)中收集了数据。观察者和综合学生对课堂层面互动质量的报告彼此中度相关,这些报告预测了学生的数学参与度和表现。学生个人对互动质量的报告也预测了数学参与度和表现;然而,教师对互动质量的报告与学生或观察者的观点不一致。此外,教师报告并不能预测学生的数学成绩。讨论了对研究、实践和政策的影响。