Psychiatric University Clinic at Hospital St. Hedwig, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany.
International Psychoanalytic University Berlin (IPU), Berlin, Germany.
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020 Jul;27(4):528-541. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2437. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
Primary aim of this study was to determine the extent and type of self-reported interpersonal problems in patients with non-affective psychoses and their impact on psychosocial functioning. Furthermore, we aimed to explore potential links with the psychodynamic construct of Stavros Mentzos' "psychotic dilemma", which describes an insufferable inner tension caused by an individual's struggle of being torn between "self-oriented" and "object-oriented" tendencies. In a cross-sectional study among 129 patients with non-affective psychoses, measures of cognition, symptom load and social functioning as well as a tentative, psychodynamic assessment of Mentzos' "dilemma" were obtained during a clinical research visit. Self-report data on interpersonal problems were gathered using the Inventory of Interpersonal Problems (IIP-64D) and compared with a German representative standard sample. Second, IIP-64D scores were compared between groups with or without Mentzos' "dilemma". Hierarchical regression analyses were performed to test for the impact of interpersonal problems on psychosocial functioning, while controlling for cognitive deficits and psychopathology. Results showed that IIP-64D scores differed significantly from healthy controls, except for "self-centred" and "intrusive" interpersonal styles. Participants with a potential "psychotic dilemma" scored significantly higher on the subscales: "domineering", "self-centred", "cold", and "socially avoidant" than the group without a "psychotic dilemma". The total amount of interpersonal problems, and particularly high scores on the IIP-64D "socially avoidant" subscale, predicted psychosocial dysfunction, whereas a "cold" interpersonal style had an opposite effect. In conclusion, specific interpersonal problems may predict psychotherapeutic outcome measures like psychosocial functioning and are partly compatible with the psychodynamic construct of Stavros Mentzos' "psychotic dilemma".
本研究的主要目的是确定非情感性精神病患者自我报告的人际问题的程度和类型,以及它们对心理社会功能的影响。此外,我们旨在探索与 Stavros Mentzos 的“精神病性困境”的心理动力学结构之间的潜在联系,该结构描述了个体在“自我导向”和“客体导向”倾向之间挣扎时所产生的难以忍受的内在紧张。在一项针对 129 名非情感性精神病患者的横断面研究中,在临床研究访视期间,我们获得了认知、症状负荷和社会功能的测量结果,以及对 Mentzos 的“困境”的试探性心理动力学评估。使用人际关系问题清单(IIP-64D)收集了人际问题的自我报告数据,并将其与德国代表性标准样本进行了比较。其次,比较了具有或不具有 Mentzos“困境”的两组之间的 IIP-64D 得分。进行层次回归分析,以测试人际关系问题对心理社会功能的影响,同时控制认知缺陷和精神病理学。结果表明,IIP-64D 得分与健康对照组存在显著差异,除了“自我中心”和“侵入性”的人际关系风格。具有潜在“精神病性困境”的参与者在“支配”、“自我中心”、“冷漠”和“社交回避”等亚量表上的得分明显高于没有“精神病性困境”的组。人际关系问题的总量,特别是 IIP-64D“社交回避”亚量表的高分,预测了心理社会功能障碍,而“冷漠”的人际关系风格则有相反的影响。总之,特定的人际关系问题可能预测心理治疗的结果测量,如心理社会功能,并且在一定程度上与 Stavros Mentzos 的“精神病性困境”的心理动力学结构相兼容。