Wayne State University College of Nursing, Detroit, MI, USA.
Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, MI, USA.
West J Nurs Res. 2020 Nov;42(11):927-936. doi: 10.1177/0193945920907686. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
This paper describes the assessment of the psychometric properties of the Brief COPE in a sample of 189 pregnant African-American women. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) tested the original 14-factor model, and exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM) determined whether a reduced number of factors still accounted for inter-item covariances. The CFA replicated 13 of the 14 original factors. After deleting substance use items and allowing for correlated error across the support factors, the 13-factor model achieved an acceptable fit (CMIN/ = 1.77; RMSEA = 0.06, 95% CI = 0.05-0.07). ESEM resulted in three second-order factors: disengaged, active, and social support coping. Factor items were summed to create subscales with good internal consistency reliability (α = .74-.89). Social support coping and active coping were strongly correlated and accounted for nearly the same variance in four different psychological/affect scales, while disengaged coping was clearly distinct.
本文描述了在 189 名非裔美国孕妇样本中对Brief COPE 的心理计量特性进行评估。验证性因子分析(CFA)检验了原有的 14 因素模型,探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)确定了减少因素数量是否仍然可以解释项目间的协方差。CFA 复制了 14 个原始因素中的 13 个。在删除物质使用项目并允许支持因素之间存在相关误差后,13 因素模型达到了可接受的拟合度(CMIN/ = 1.77;RMSEA = 0.06,95%CI = 0.05-0.07)。ESEM 产生了三个二阶因素:疏离、积极和社会支持应对。将因素项目相加,为具有良好内部一致性可靠性(α =.74-.89)的子量表创建了子量表。社会支持应对和积极应对密切相关,并在四个不同的心理/情感量表中解释了几乎相同的方差,而疏离应对则明显不同。