DSI-NRF Centre of Excellence in Human Development, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; SAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
SAMRC/Wits Developmental Pathways for Health Research Unit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa; Center for Global Health and Mongan Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
J Affect Disord. 2022 Apr 15;303:353-358. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.02.035. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
Mental health disorders are amongst the leading contributors to the burden of disease and need to be prioritised in policy making and program implementation. In the absence of mental healthcare, people often navigate their own social support and activate individual coping mechanisms to sustain their emotional well-being. Few South African studies conceptualise and evaluate the strategies people use to manage adverse situations in non-clinical samples. We conducted two related ethnographic studies of stress and coping in Soweto (n = 107). We then used the studies to develop a novel scale to measure local forms of coping and evaluated its use in an epidemiological surveillance study (n = 933). In a split sample analysis, we first conducted exploratory factor analyses and then a comparative fit index assessment. In the exploratory factor analysis, we obtained a two-factor solution: problem-focused/emotional coping and religious coping. In the confirmatory factor analysis, both domains had good model fit above the conservative ≥ 0.95 cut-off, and both factors had adequate internal consistency (religious coping = 0.72; problem/emotion focused coping = 0.69). Both the problem-focused/emotional and the religious coping subscales were positively correlated with quality of life, except that the religious coping subscale was not correlated with social relationships. Total adverse childhood experiences were correlated with the problem-focused/emotional coping subscale but not with the religious coping subscale. We conclude that the Soweto Coping Scale provides a novel understanding of local forms of coping and can be used by mental healthcare researchers and providers who seek to develop interventions for promoting mental health and social well-being.
心理健康障碍是疾病负担的主要原因之一,需要在政策制定和项目实施中优先考虑。在缺乏精神卫生保健的情况下,人们通常会利用自己的社会支持,并激活个人应对机制来维持自己的情绪健康。很少有南非研究从概念上和评估人们在非临床样本中用于管理不利情况的策略。我们对索韦托的压力和应对策略进行了两项相关的民族志研究(n=107)。然后,我们使用这些研究开发了一种新的量表来衡量当地的应对方式,并在一项流行病学监测研究(n=933)中评估了其使用情况。在样本分割分析中,我们首先进行了探索性因素分析,然后进行了比较拟合指数评估。在探索性因素分析中,我们得到了一个两因素解决方案:问题焦点/情绪应对和宗教应对。在验证性因素分析中,两个领域都具有良好的模型拟合度,超过了保守的≥0.95的截止值,并且两个因素都具有足够的内部一致性(宗教应对=0.72;问题/情绪焦点应对=0.69)。问题焦点/情绪应对和宗教应对两个分量表都与生活质量呈正相关,只是宗教应对分量表与社会关系不相关。总不良童年经历与问题焦点/情绪应对分量表相关,但与宗教应对分量表不相关。我们得出结论,索韦托应对量表提供了对当地应对方式的新理解,可被寻求促进心理健康和社会福祉的精神卫生保健研究人员和提供者使用。