University at Buffalo, The State University of New York, Buffalo, New York.
Aggress Behav. 2020 May;46(3):220-231. doi: 10.1002/ab.21883. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
The present study sought to examine the influence of aggressive behavior, psychopathy, and gender on moral judgments of aggressive transgressions. A two-dimensional conceptualization of aggression was used, such that proactive relational aggression, reactive relational aggression, proactive physical aggression, and reactive physical aggression were treated as distinct subtypes of aggression and also as distinct subtypes of moral judgments of aggression. Participants were 421 emerging adults (215 women). Self-report measures of aggression, psychopathy, and moral judgments were collected. Peer-reports of aggression and psychopathy were obtained from a randomly assigned subsample of 73 participants (46 women) for validity purposes. Unique associations were found between subtypes of aggression and corresponding moral judgments of the same subtypes.
本研究旨在探讨攻击行为、精神病态和性别对攻击性行为道德判断的影响。采用了二维的攻击概念化,即主动关系攻击、被动关系攻击、主动身体攻击和被动身体攻击被视为攻击的不同亚型,也是攻击的道德判断的不同亚型。参与者为 421 名成年早期个体(215 名女性)。收集了攻击、精神病态和道德判断的自我报告测量。为了验证目的,从随机分配的 73 名参与者(46 名女性)中获得了攻击和精神病态的同伴报告。发现攻击的亚型与同一亚型的相应道德判断之间存在独特的关联。