• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2018年美国《清洁空气法》主要污染源要求指南下的有害空气污染物排放影响

Hazardous air pollutant emissions implications under 2018 guidance on U.S. Clean Air Act requirements for major sources.

作者信息

Declet-Barreto Juan, Goldman Gretchen T, Desikan Anita, Berman Emily, Goldman Joshua, Johnson Charise, Montenegro Leonard, Rosenberg Andrew A

机构信息

Center for Science and Democracy, Union of Concerned Scientists, Washington, DC, USA.

NumAIRic, Inc., Chandler, AZ, USA.

出版信息

J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2020 May;70(5):481-490. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2020.1735575. Epub 2020 Apr 13.

DOI:10.1080/10962247.2020.1735575
PMID:32101104
Abstract

On January 25, 2018, the United States Environmental Protection Agency withdrew a 1995 policy that mandates the use of maximum achievable control technology (MACT) to regulate emissions from major sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs), a category of toxic chemicals that may be carcinogenic, mutagenic, or cause other adverse health effects. To better understand the implications and scope of the change in regulatory guidance for HAP emissions of major sources that may reclassify as area sources, the increase in emissions that could legally occur under the new policy is assessed here. Based on facility-level data from a 2014 HAP national emissions inventory, it is estimated that 70% of major sources of HAPs qualify for reclassification as area sources, which could result in a maximum of 35,030 tons per year (tpy) of additional HAP emissions if all sources successfully reclassified. This amount would nearly triple the total volume of HAPs that qualifying major sources emitted in 2014. On average, qualifying sources could emit individually an additional 18.4 tpy. In the 21 states and territories that follow only federal guidelines for controlling HAPs, it is more likely that the estimates presented here could materialize compared to states that have additional guidelines for area sources of HAPs. The quantitative analysis of the potential emission changes resulting from regulatory change is instructive for industry, state and federal decisionmakers, and interested members of the public looking to understand and anticipate how relevant stakeholders will be affected by this policy change.: Withdrawal of a U.S. Environmental Protection Agency policy that mandates the use of maximum achievable control technology (MACT) to regulate emissions from major sources of hazardous air pollutants (HAPs) could result in higher emissions of toxic chemicals that may be carcinogenic, mutagenic, or cause other adverse health effects. Analysis of potential emission changes resulting from regulatory change is instructive for industry, state, and federal decisionmakers, and interested members of the public looking to understand and anticipate how relevant stakeholders will be affected by this policy change.

摘要

2018年1月25日,美国环境保护局撤销了一项1995年的政策,该政策要求使用最大可实现控制技术(MACT)来监管危险空气污染物(HAPs)主要来源的排放,HAPs是一类可能致癌、致突变或导致其他不良健康影响的有毒化学品。为了更好地理解可能重新归类为区域源的主要来源HAPs排放监管指南变化的影响和范围,本文评估了在新政策下可能合法发生的排放量增加情况。基于2014年HAP国家排放清单中的设施层面数据,估计70%的HAPs主要来源符合重新归类为区域源的条件,如果所有来源都成功重新归类,每年可能导致最多35,030吨的额外HAPs排放。这个数量将使符合条件的主要来源在2014年排放的HAPs总量增加近两倍。平均而言,符合条件的来源各自可能额外排放18.4吨/年。在仅遵循联邦控制HAPs指南的21个州和领地,与对HAPs区域源有额外指南的州相比,本文提出的估计更有可能成为现实。对监管变化导致的潜在排放变化进行定量分析,对行业、州和联邦决策者以及希望了解和预测相关利益攸关方将如何受到这一政策变化影响的公众感兴趣的成员具有指导意义。:美国环境保护局撤销一项要求使用最大可实现控制技术(MACT)来监管危险空气污染物(HAPs)主要来源排放的政策,可能导致可能致癌、致突变或导致其他不良健康影响的有毒化学品排放量增加。对监管变化导致的潜在排放变化进行分析,对行业、州和联邦决策者以及希望了解和预测相关利益攸关方将如何受到这一政策变化影响的公众感兴趣的成员具有指导意义。

相似文献

1
Hazardous air pollutant emissions implications under 2018 guidance on U.S. Clean Air Act requirements for major sources.2018年美国《清洁空气法》主要污染源要求指南下的有害空气污染物排放影响
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2020 May;70(5):481-490. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2020.1735575. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
2
Overview of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Hazardous Air Pollutant Early Reduction Program.美国环境保护局有害空气污染物早期减排计划概述。
J Air Waste Manage Assoc. 1992 Jan;42(1):31-5. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1992.10466966.
3
Air toxics and health risks in California: the public health implications of outdoor concentrations.加利福尼亚州的空气有毒物质与健康风险:室外浓度对公众健康的影响
Risk Anal. 2000 Apr;20(2):273-91. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.202026.
4
Modeling population exposures to outdoor sources of hazardous air pollutants.模拟人群暴露于室外有害空气污染物源的情况。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2008 Jan;18(1):45-58. doi: 10.1038/sj.jes.7500612. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
5
Impact of three interactive Texas state regulatory programs to decrease ambient air toxic levels.减少环境空气有毒物质水平的三个德克萨斯州州立监管项目的影响。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2013 May;63(5):507-20. doi: 10.1080/10962247.2013.763868.
6
An analysis of candidates for addition to the Clean Air Act list of hazardous air pollutants.对《清洁空气法》危险空气污染物名单新增候选物质的分析。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 2004 Feb;54(2):157-71. doi: 10.1080/10473289.2004.10470899.
7
Application of health information to hazardous air pollutants modeled in EPA's Cumulative Exposure Project.健康信息在环境保护局累积暴露项目中所模拟的有害空气污染物方面的应用。
Toxicol Ind Health. 1998 May-Jun;14(3):429-54. doi: 10.1177/074823379801400304.
8
Projection of hazardous air pollutant emissions to future years.危险空气污染物排放到未来年份的预测。
Sci Total Environ. 2006 Aug 1;366(2-3):590-601. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.11.026. Epub 2006 Jan 30.
9
National estimates of outdoor air toxics concentrations.全国室外空气有毒物质浓度估算。
J Air Waste Manag Assoc. 1999 Oct;49(10):1138-52. doi: 10.1080/10473289.1999.10463919.
10
Part 1. Statistical Learning Methods for the Effects of Multiple Air Pollution Constituents.第1部分. 多种空气污染成分影响的统计学习方法
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2015 Jun(183 Pt 1-2):5-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Invited Perspective: Leveraging Air Quality Research Advancements to Assess and Address Exposure Inequities.特邀观点:利用空气质量研究进展评估和解决暴露不平等问题。
Environ Health Perspect. 2023 Mar;131(3):31302. doi: 10.1289/EHP12503. Epub 2023 Mar 8.