• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The learning curve of one anastomosis gastric bypass and its impact as a preceding procedure to Roux-en Y gastric bypass: initial experience of one hundred and five consecutive cases.单吻合口胃旁路手术的学习曲线及其作为Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术前置手术的影响:105例连续病例的初步经验
BMC Surg. 2020 Feb 26;20(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00697-9.
2
Management of super-super obese patients: comparison between one anastomosis (mini) gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.超级肥胖患者的管理:单吻合口(迷你)胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Sep;31(9):3504-3509. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5376-x. Epub 2016 Dec 15.
3
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass-Mini-Gastric Bypass (OAGB-MGB) Versus Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB)-a Mid-Term Cohort Study with 612 Patients.一种吻合口胃旁路-迷你胃旁路术(OAGB-MGB)与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)的中期队列研究:612 例患者。
Obes Surg. 2020 Apr;30(4):1230-1240. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04250-3.
4
Conversion of one-anastomosis gastric bypass to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: short-term results from a tertiary referral center.单吻合口胃旁路术转为 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:来自一家三级转诊中心的短期结果。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Nov;15(11):1896-1902. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.09.059. Epub 2019 Sep 11.
5
Comparison of one-anastomosis gastric bypass and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for treatment of obesity: a 5-year study.比较单吻合口胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗肥胖症:一项 5 年研究。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019 Dec;15(12):2038-2044. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2019.05.025. Epub 2019 May 24.
6
Randomized Controlled Trial of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: Comparison of the YOMEGA and Taiwan Studies.随机对照试验比较 One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass 与 Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass 治疗肥胖症:YOMEGA 研究与台湾研究的比较。
Obes Surg. 2019 Sep;29(9):3047-3053. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04065-2.
7
OAGB vs BGBP: A retrospective comparative study of a cohort of patients who had bariatric surgery in 2012 at one centre by a single surgeon.袖状胃切除术与胆胰转流术伴十二指肠转位术对比:对2012年在某中心由同一位外科医生实施减肥手术的一组患者进行的回顾性对比研究。
Clin Obes. 2019 Aug;9(4):e12308. doi: 10.1111/cob.12308. Epub 2019 Apr 7.
8
Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.一种吻合胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的疗效和安全性比较(YOMEGA):一项多中心、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 30;393(10178):1299-1309. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30475-1. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
9
One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, remedy for insufficient weight loss and weight regain after failed restrictive bariatric surgery.单吻合口胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗限制型减重手术后减重不足和体重反弹
Obes Surg. 2020 Sep;30(9):3287-3294. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04536-x.
10
One anastomosis gastric bypass vs. Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a 5-year follow-up prospective randomized trial.单吻合口胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术:一项 5 年随访前瞻性随机试验。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2021 Feb;406(1):171-179. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01949-1. Epub 2020 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Complementary Roles of PCT, CRP, WBC, and ΔWBC in Early Leak Detection After Bariatric Surgery: A Retrospective Pilot Study.降钙素原、C反应蛋白、白细胞及白细胞变化值在减重手术后早期渗漏检测中的互补作用:一项回顾性初步研究
Obes Surg. 2025 Aug 16. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-08177-w.
2
Comparative Study for Safety and Efficacy of OAGB and SADJB-SG: A Retrospective Study.OAGB与SADJB-SG安全性和有效性的比较研究:一项回顾性研究。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2024 Sep 19;17:3499-3508. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S484616. eCollection 2024.
3
Metabolic and Bariatric Surgeon Criteria-An International Experts' Consensus.代谢与减重外科医师资质认证:国际专家共识
Obes Surg. 2024 Sep;34(9):3216-3228. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07395-y. Epub 2024 Jul 24.
4
Technical Variations and Considerations around OAGB in IFSO-APC and IFSO-MENAC Chapters, an Expert Survey.OAGB 在 IFSO-APC 和 IFSO-MENAC 章节中的技术差异和注意事项,一项专家调查。
Obes Surg. 2024 Jun;34(6):2054-2065. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07239-9. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
5
Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in Children: Current Practices and Outcomes.儿童代谢和减重手术:当前实践和结果。
Curr Obes Rep. 2024 Mar;13(1):77-86. doi: 10.1007/s13679-023-00540-1. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
6
Safety and efficacy of OAGB/MGB during the learning curve: setting a benchmark in a bariatric center of excellence.OAGB/MGB 在学习曲线上的安全性和有效性:在卓越的减重中心设定基准。
Updates Surg. 2023 Jan;75(1):169-174. doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01380-9. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
7
Revisional Surgery of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass for Severe Protein-Energy Malnutrition.胃旁路术吻合口再手术治疗严重蛋白质能量营养不良
Nutrients. 2022 Jun 6;14(11):2356. doi: 10.3390/nu14112356.
8
Areas of Non-Consensus Around One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB): A Narrative Review.关于单吻合口/迷你胃旁路术(OAGB/MGB)的非共识领域:叙述性综述。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jun;31(6):2453-2463. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05276-2. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
9
Reappraisal learning curve of laparoscopic Roux-en Y gastric bypass: retrospective results of one hundred and eight cases from a low-volume unit.腹腔镜 Roux-en Y 胃旁路术的再评估学习曲线:低容量单位一百零八例回顾性结果。
BMC Surg. 2021 Feb 15;21(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01058-w.
10
Bariatric Surgical Simulation: Evaluation in a Pilot Study of SimLife, a New Dynamic Simulated Body Model.减重手术模拟:SimLife,一种新型动态模拟人体模型的初步研究评估。
Obes Surg. 2020 Nov;30(11):4352-4358. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04829-1. Epub 2020 Jul 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Randomized Controlled Trial of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Versus Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass for Obesity: Comparison of the YOMEGA and Taiwan Studies.随机对照试验比较 One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass 与 Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass 治疗肥胖症:YOMEGA 研究与台湾研究的比较。
Obes Surg. 2019 Sep;29(9):3047-3053. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04065-2.
2
One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass in Morbidly Obese Patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m: a Systematic Review Comparing It with Roux-En-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.肥胖症患者体重指数(BMI)≥50kg/m2 行单吻合口胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术的对比:系统评价
Obes Surg. 2019 Sep;29(9):3039-3046. doi: 10.1007/s11695-019-04034-9.
3
Efficacy and safety of one anastomosis gastric bypass versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for obesity (YOMEGA): a multicentre, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial.一种吻合胃旁路术与 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术治疗肥胖症的疗效和安全性比较(YOMEGA):一项多中心、随机、开放标签、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 30;393(10178):1299-1309. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30475-1. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
4
One Anastomosis (Mini) Gastric Bypass Is Now an Established Bariatric Procedure: a Systematic Review of 12,807 Patients.一种吻合(小)胃旁路术现已成为一种成熟的减重手术:对 12807 例患者的系统评价。
Obes Surg. 2018 Sep;28(9):2956-2967. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3382-x.
5
Mini Gastric Bypass-One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (MGB-OAGB)-IFSO Position Statement.迷你胃旁路手术-单吻合口胃旁路术(MGB-OAGB)-IFSO 立场声明。
Obes Surg. 2018 May;28(5):1188-1206. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3182-3.
6
The First Consensus Statement on One Anastomosis/Mini Gastric Bypass (OAGB/MGB) Using a Modified Delphi Approach.关于采用改良德尔菲法的单吻合口/迷你胃旁路术(OAGB/MGB)的第一份共识声明。
Obes Surg. 2018 Feb;28(2):303-312. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-3070-2.
7
Mastery in Bariatric Surgery: The Long-term Surgeon Learning Curve of Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.减重手术的精通之路:Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的长期外科医生学习曲线。
Ann Surg. 2018 Mar;267(3):489-494. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002180.
8
Petersen's hernia after mini (one anastomosis) gastric bypass.迷你(单吻合口)胃旁路术后的彼得森疝
J Visc Surg. 2016 Aug;153(4):321. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.05.010. Epub 2016 Jun 24.
9
Conversion of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass (OAGB) Is Rarely Needed if Standard Operative Techniques Are Performed.如果采用标准手术技术,很少需要进行单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB)的转换。
Obes Surg. 2016 Jul;26(7):1588-91. doi: 10.1007/s11695-016-2172-6.
10
Mini Gastric Bypass: first report of 125 consecutive cases from United Kingdom.迷你胃旁路手术:来自英国的125例连续病例的首次报告。
Clin Obes. 2016 Feb;6(1):61-7. doi: 10.1111/cob.12124.

单吻合口胃旁路手术的学习曲线及其作为Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术前置手术的影响:105例连续病例的初步经验

The learning curve of one anastomosis gastric bypass and its impact as a preceding procedure to Roux-en Y gastric bypass: initial experience of one hundred and five consecutive cases.

作者信息

Lo Hung-Chieh

机构信息

Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, Wan Fang Hospital, Taipei Medical University, No. 111, Sec. 3, Xinglong Rd., Wenshan Dist., Taipei City, 116, Taiwan, Republic of China.

School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, No. 111, Sec. 3, Xinglong Rd., Wenshan Dist., Taipei City, 116, Taiwan, Republic of China.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2020 Feb 26;20(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12893-020-00697-9.

DOI:10.1186/s12893-020-00697-9
PMID:32101137
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7045633/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to assess the learning curve of one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB-MGB) at the start of a low volume bariatric unit and analyze its impact as a preceding procedure to Roux-en Y gastric bypass (RYGB).

METHODS

From January 2014 to December 2017, all patients who underwent bariatric surgeries in our teaching hospital that were performed by the same surgeon were enrolled. The first 47 patients who underwent OAGB-MGB were assigned to group A. RYGB has been offered as a treatment option since July 2016; thereafter, 26 patients who underwent OAGB-MGB and 32 patients who underwent RYGB at the same time interval were assigned to group B and group C, respectively. Baseline characteristics, perioperative outcomes and percentage of total weight loss (%TWL) up to 12 months postoperatively were collected and analyzed between groups.

RESULTS

Compared to the patients in group C, those in groups A and B were older (39.4 yrs. and 42.2 yrs., respectively, vs. 34.2 yrs.; p = 0.021) and predominantly male (48.9 and 73.1%, respectively vs. 40.6%; p = 0.04), and they had a higher body mass index (41.8 kg/m and 43.3 kg/m, respectively vs. 37.7 kg/m; p = 0.002) and a higher incidence of hypertension (44.7 and 61.5%, respectively vs. 21.9%; p = 0.008). In addition, the operation time was significantly reduced (118.2 min and 115.8 min, respectively vs. 153.1 min; p <  0.001), and the length of stay was shortened (3.0 days and 2.9 days, respectively vs. 3.4 days; p = 0.002) in groups B and C compared to group A. No mortality, conversion or leakage was reported throughout the study period. The 30-day complication rate was decreased in group C compared to groups A and B (0% vs. 6.4 and 7.7%, respectively; p = 0.307). The %TWL at the 12-month follow-up was 36.3, 30.9 and 28.3% for groups A, B and C, respectively (p <  0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our study verified the early emergence of a learning curve effect for OAGB-MGB, and the proficiency acquired can be transferred to subsequent practice for RYGB in terms of acceptable operation time and length of stay without an increase in complications.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是评估在一个低容量减肥手术科室开展单吻合口胃旁路术(OAGB - MGB)的学习曲线,并分析其作为Roux - en Y胃旁路术(RYGB)前置手术的影响。

方法

2014年1月至2017年12月,纳入在我们教学医院由同一位外科医生进行减肥手术的所有患者。最初接受OAGB - MGB的47例患者被分配到A组。自2016年7月起RYGB被作为一种治疗选择;此后,在相同时间间隔内接受OAGB - MGB的26例患者和接受RYGB的32例患者分别被分配到B组和C组。收集并分析各组之间的基线特征、围手术期结局以及术后12个月的总体重减轻百分比(%TWL)。

结果

与C组患者相比,A组和B组患者年龄更大(分别为39.4岁和42.2岁,对比34.2岁;p = 0.021)且男性占比更高(分别为48.9%和73.1%,对比40.6%;p = 0.04),他们的体重指数更高(分别为41.8kg/m²和43.3kg/m²,对比37.7kg/m²;p = 0.002),高血压发病率更高(分别为44.7%和61.5%,对比21.9%;p = 0.008)。此外,与A组相比,B组和C组的手术时间显著缩短(分别为118.2分钟和115.8分钟,对比153.1分钟;p < 0.001),住院时间缩短(分别为3.0天和2.9天,对比3.4天;p = 0.002)。在整个研究期间未报告死亡、中转或渗漏情况。与A组和B组相比,C组的30天并发症发生率降低(分别为0%对比6.4%和7.7%;p = 0.307)。A、B、C组在12个月随访时的%TWL分别为36.3%、30.9%和28.3%(p < 0.001)。

结论

我们的研究证实了OAGB - MGB学习曲线效应的早期出现,并且所获得的熟练程度可以在可接受的手术时间和住院时间方面转移到后续的RYGB手术实践中,而不会增加并发症。