Mullins L S, Kopelman R E
Rutgers University.
J Pers Assess. 1988 Winter;52(4):610-25. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5204_2.
In recent years there has been growing conceptual interest in narcissism, coupled with the rapid development of several paper and pencil measures. Clearly, construct validation should be performed prior to the adoption of any measure. This study reports on the construct validation of four scales that purport to measure narcissism. A conceptual definition of narcissism is provided, and a number of empirical analyses are performed, including examination of internal consistency reliabilities, intercorrelations among the four narcissism scales, and correlations with related and unrelated measures. Three of the four scales were found to be consistently related to each other, and demonstrated similar patterns of substantive and discriminant validity. A factor analysis, performed to examine the structure of the four narcissism measures, suggests four dimensions: desire for attention, admiration, and authority; feelings of inadequacy, unhappiness, and worry; disturbances in interpersonal relationships (exploitation, sense of entitlement, lack of empathy); and sensitivity to criticism and defeat. Implications of the results are discussed.
近年来,人们对自恋的概念兴趣日益浓厚,同时几种纸笔测量方法也迅速发展。显然,在采用任何测量方法之前都应进行结构效度验证。本研究报告了旨在测量自恋的四个量表的结构效度验证情况。提供了自恋的概念定义,并进行了一些实证分析,包括内部一致性信度检验、四个自恋量表之间的相互关联以及与相关和不相关测量的相关性分析。发现四个量表中的三个彼此之间存在一致的关联,并表现出相似的实质效度和区分效度模式。为检验四个自恋测量的结构而进行的因素分析表明有四个维度:对关注、钦佩和权威的渴望;不足感、不快乐和担忧;人际关系中的困扰(剥削、权利感、缺乏同理心);以及对批评和失败的敏感。讨论了结果的意义。