• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大五人格量表和 NEO 人格量表的宜人性得分比较:对自恋和精神病态研究的影响。

A comparison of Agreeableness scores from the Big Five Inventory and the NEO PI-R: consequences for the study of narcissism and psychopathy.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-3013, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2011 Sep;18(3):335-9. doi: 10.1177/1073191111411671. Epub 2011 Jun 10.

DOI:10.1177/1073191111411671
PMID:21665883
Abstract

Despite being significantly correlated, there is evidence to suggest that the scales measuring Agreeableness from the Big Five Inventory (BFI) and the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) do not capture identical constructs. More specifically, NEO PI-R Agreeableness contains content related to "honesty and humility" that is not contained by the BFI. In a sample of undergraduates (N = 290), the authors compared the correlations between these two measures of Agreeableness with traits from the HEXACO-PI-R as well as measures of narcissism, narcissistic personality disorder, and psychopathy. As expected, the two scores were significantly correlated but NEO PI-R Agreeableness manifested stronger correlations with the domains/facets of Honesty-Humility, narcissism/NPD, and aspects of psychopathy; these differences appear to be due primarily to the inclusion of the NEO PI-R facets of Straightforwardness and Modesty. These differences have important implications for the assessment and conceptualization of personality and personality disorder.

摘要

尽管存在显著的相关性,但有证据表明,大五人格量表(BFI)和修订版 NEO 人格量表(NEO PI-R)中测量宜人性的量表并没有捕捉到相同的结构。更具体地说,NEO PI-R 中的宜人性包含了与“诚实和谦逊”有关的内容,而 BFI 中并不包含这些内容。在一组本科生样本(N=290)中,作者比较了这两种宜人性测量方法与 HEXACO-PI-R 中的特质以及自恋、自恋型人格障碍和精神病态的相关性。正如预期的那样,这两个分数显著相关,但 NEO PI-R 中的宜人性与诚实-谦逊、自恋/NPD 和精神病态的某些方面表现出更强的相关性;这些差异似乎主要归因于 NEO PI-R 直爽和谦逊方面的纳入。这些差异对人格和人格障碍的评估和概念化具有重要意义。

相似文献

1
A comparison of Agreeableness scores from the Big Five Inventory and the NEO PI-R: consequences for the study of narcissism and psychopathy.大五人格量表和 NEO 人格量表的宜人性得分比较:对自恋和精神病态研究的影响。
Assessment. 2011 Sep;18(3):335-9. doi: 10.1177/1073191111411671. Epub 2011 Jun 10.
2
Examining the utility of general models of personality in the study of psychopathy: a comparison of the HEXACO-PI-R and NEO PI-R.考察人格的一般模型在研究精神病态学中的效用:HEXACO-PI-R 和 NEO PI-R 的比较。
J Pers Disord. 2012 Aug;26(4):513-23. doi: 10.1521/pedi.2012.26.4.513.
3
Comparing two alternative measures of general personality in the assessment of psychopathy: a test of the NEO PI-R and the MPQ.在精神病态评估中比较两种通用人格的替代测量方法:NEO人格量表修订版(NEO PI-R)和多维人格问卷(MPQ)的测试
J Pers. 2009 Aug;77(4):965-96. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00571.x. Epub 2009 May 18.
4
Examining the construct validity of the elemental psychopathy assessment.检验基本精神病理学评估的构想效度。
Assessment. 2011 Mar;18(1):106-14. doi: 10.1177/1073191110393139. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
5
Factors of the psychopathic personality inventory: criterion-related validity and relationship to the BIS/BAS and five-factor models of personality.精神病态人格问卷的因素:效标关联效度及其与行为抑制系统/行为激活系统和人格五因素模型的关系
Assessment. 2009 Mar;16(1):71-87. doi: 10.1177/1073191108322207. Epub 2008 Aug 14.
6
The five-factor narcissism inventory: a five-factor measure of narcissistic personality traits.五因素自恋人格量表:一种五因素测量自恋人格特质的工具。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(5):500-12. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.670680. Epub 2012 Apr 4.
7
Is the Narcissistic Personality Inventory still relevant? A test of independent grandiosity and entitlement scales in the assessment of narcissism.自恋人格量表是否仍然适用?独立的浮夸和权利量表在自恋评估中的检验。
Assessment. 2012 Mar;19(1):8-13. doi: 10.1177/1073191111429390. Epub 2011 Dec 6.
8
Convergence of narcissism measures from the perspective of general personality functioning.从一般人格功能角度看自恋测量的趋同性。
Assessment. 2008 Sep;15(3):364-74. doi: 10.1177/1073191108314278. Epub 2008 Feb 29.
9
[Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory].[10 项大五人格量表法语版的验证]
Encephale. 2020 Dec;46(6):455-462. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.02.006. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
10
Are pathological narcissism and psychopathy different constructs or different names for the same thing? A study based on Italian nonclinical adult participants.病理性自恋和精神病态是不同的概念,还是同一事物的不同称谓?一项基于意大利非临床成年参与者的研究。
J Pers Disord. 2014 Jun;28(3):394-418. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2014_28_127. Epub 2014 Feb 10.

引用本文的文献

1
The differential effect of psychopathy on active and bystander trolling behaviors: the role of dark tetrad traits and lower agreeableness.精神变态对主动和旁观者网络欺凌行为的差异影响:黑暗人格四因素特质和较低宜人性的作用。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 30;14(1):9905. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60203-6.
2
Managing the COVID-19 pandemic in people with mental disorders: An exploratory telephone interview study in a psychiatric outpatient department.管理精神障碍患者中的 COVID-19 大流行:精神科门诊的探索性电话访谈研究。
Compr Psychiatry. 2022 Jul;116:152313. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2022.152313. Epub 2022 Apr 9.
3
Interpersonal traits and the neural representations of cognitive control in the prefrontal cortex.
前额叶皮层中人际特质与认知控制的神经表现。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2022 Oct;22(5):1001-1020. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-00986-1. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
4
On the importance of the assessment and conceptualization of Agreeableness: A commentary on "Agreeableness and the common core of dark traits are functionally different constructs".关于宜人性评估与概念化的重要性:对《宜人性与黑暗特质的共同核心在功能上是不同的结构》的评论
J Res Pers. 2021 Feb;90. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104059. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
5
Trajectories of Big Five Personality Traits: A Coordinated Analysis of 16 Longitudinal Samples.大五人格特质的发展轨迹:对16个纵向样本的协同分析
Eur J Pers. 2020 May;34(3):301-321. doi: 10.1002/per.2259. Epub 2020 May 1.
6
Trait Aggression is Primarily a Facet of Antagonism: Evidence from Dominance, Latent Correlational, and Item-Level Analyses.特质攻击性主要是敌对性的一个方面:来自支配性、潜在相关性和项目层面分析的证据。
J Res Pers. 2020 Dec;89. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2020.104042. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
7
Self-Absorbed and Socially (Network) Engaged: Narcissistic Traits and Social Networking Site Use.自我专注与社交(网络)参与:自恋特质与社交网站使用
J Res Pers. 2020 Feb;84. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103898. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
8
Sluggish Cognitive Tempo and Personality: Links to BIS/BAS Sensitivity and the Five Factor Model.认知迟缓节奏与人格:与行为抑制系统/行为激活系统敏感性及五因素模型的联系
J Res Pers. 2018 Aug;75:103-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jun 7.
9
Relation between personality disorders and characteristics of multiple sclerosis patients and their parents.人格障碍与多发性硬化症患者及其父母特征之间的关系。
J Educ Health Promot. 2018 Aug 2;7:106. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_185_17. eCollection 2018.
10
What does media use reveal about personality and mental health? An exploratory investigation among German students.媒体使用能揭示出关于个性和心理健康的哪些信息?对德国学生的一项探索性调查。
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 25;13(1):e0191810. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191810. eCollection 2018.