Suppr超能文献

评估法国大学附属医院急诊医生识别药物不良事件的能力。

Evaluation of the Ability of Emergency Room Doctors at a French University Hospital Center to Identify Adverse Drug Events.

机构信息

From the Clinical Pharmacy.

Emergency Unit, Nantes UHC, France.

出版信息

J Patient Saf. 2021 Jun 1;17(4):e355-e359. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000650.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Numerous adverse drug events (ADEs) are not identified by doctors in medical emergencies, and they are a barrier to optimal treatment of patients. Identification of the factors that influence awareness of ADEs by doctors could allow events that compromise patient safety to be avoided. The aims of this study were to quantify the recognition of ADEs by emergency room (ER) doctors and to identify the factors associated with the lack of identification of drug-related risks.

METHODS

This study was carried out at the ER of a French teaching hospital between January 1, 2014, and the December 31, 2017. A previously used form was administered to the patients being treated in the ER, and it was completed using medical files to identify ADEs. The ADEs were then validated by a doctor and a senior pharmacist.

RESULTS

Of the 1870 included patients, 279 (14.9%) exhibited an ADE. Of these 279 ADEs, 201 (72%) had been identified by the doctor. The probability of an ADE being identified was higher when the drug was directly linked with the main ailment of the patient (odds ratio, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.97). Adverse drug events were identified less well when their severity was limited (spontaneous regression without treatment) (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that ADEs are identified less well when their severity is limited, as well as when the ADE is not directly linked with the main ailment of the patient.

摘要

目的

在医疗急救中,许多药物不良反应(ADE)并未被医生识别,这成为了优化患者治疗的障碍。识别影响医生对 ADE 意识的因素,可以避免危及患者安全的事件发生。本研究旨在量化急诊室(ER)医生对 ADE 的识别率,并确定与未识别药物相关风险相关的因素。

方法

本研究于 2014 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 12 月 31 日在法国一所教学医院的 ER 进行。对在 ER 接受治疗的患者使用了之前使用过的表格,并通过病历来识别 ADE。然后由一名医生和一名高级药剂师对 ADE 进行验证。

结果

在纳入的 1870 名患者中,有 279 名(14.9%)表现出 ADE。在这 279 例 ADE 中,有 201 例(72%)被医生识别。当药物与患者的主要疾病直接相关时,识别 ADE 的可能性更高(优势比,1.72;95%置信区间,1.01-2.97)。当 ADE 的严重程度有限(无需治疗即可自行缓解)时,识别 ADE 的能力较差(优势比,0.5;95%置信区间,0.27-0.93)。

结论

本研究表明,当 ADE 的严重程度有限,以及当 ADE 与患者的主要疾病没有直接关联时,ADE 的识别能力较差。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验