Zhuang Pan, Zhang Yu, Mao Lei, Wang Liang, Wu Fei, Cheng Longfei, Jiao Jingjing
National Engineering Laboratory of Intelligent Food Technology and Equipment, Zhejiang Key Laboratory for Agro-Food Processing, College of Biosystems Engineering and Food Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Department of Nutrition, School of Public Health, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China.
Br J Nutr. 2020 Jul 14;124(1):102-111. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520000677. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
Although higher dietary intake of MUFA has been shown to improve glycaemic control and lipid profiles, whether MUFA consumption from different sources is linked to the development of type 2 diabetes (T2D) remains unclear. We aimed to prospectively assess the associations of plant-derived MUFA (P-MUFA) and animal-derived MUFA (A-MUFA) intakes with T2D risk in a nationwide oriental cohort. Overall, 15 022 Chinese adults, aged ≥20 years, from the China Health and Nutrition Survey (CHNS 1997-2011) were prospectively followed up for a median of 14 years. Consumption of MUFA from plant and animal sources was assessed using 3-d 24-h recalls in each survey, and the cumulative average of intake was calculated. Multivariable-adjusted Cox models were constructed to estimate the hazard ratios (HR) of T2D according to quartiles of MUFA intake. P-MUFA were mainly consumed from cooked vegetable oils, fried bread sticks and rice, while A-MUFA were mainly consumed from pork, lard and eggs. Intake of P-MUFA was associated with a higher risk of T2D (HR 1·50 (95 % CI 1·18, 1·90); = 0·0013), whereas A-MUFA showed no significant association (HR 0·84 (95 % CI 0·59, 1·20); = 0·30). When further considering the cooking method of food sources, consumption of P-MUFA from fried foods was positively associated with T2D risk (HR 1·60 (95 % CI 1·26, 2·02); = 0·0006), whereas non-fried P-MUFA were not associated. Intake of MUFA from fried plant-based foods may elevate T2D risk among the Chinese population.
尽管较高的膳食单不饱和脂肪酸(MUFA)摄入量已被证明可改善血糖控制和血脂水平,但不同来源的MUFA摄入与2型糖尿病(T2D)发病之间是否存在关联仍不清楚。我们旨在对一个全国性的东方队列中植物源性MUFA(P-MUFA)和动物源性MUFA(A-MUFA)摄入量与T2D风险的关联进行前瞻性评估。总体而言,对来自中国健康与营养调查(CHNS 1997 - 2011)的15022名年龄≥20岁的中国成年人进行了为期14年的前瞻性随访。每次调查均采用3天24小时膳食回顾法评估植物和动物来源的MUFA摄入量,并计算摄入量的累积平均值。构建多变量调整的Cox模型以根据MUFA摄入量的四分位数估计T2D的风险比(HR)。P-MUFA主要来自烹饪植物油、油条和米饭,而A-MUFA主要来自猪肉、猪油和鸡蛋。P-MUFA的摄入与较高的T2D风险相关(HR 1.50(95%CI 1.18,1.90);P = 0.0013),而A-MUFA未显示出显著关联(HR 0.84(95%CI 0.59,1.20);P = 0.30)。当进一步考虑食物来源的烹饪方法时,油炸食品中P-MUFA的消费与T2D风险呈正相关(HR 1.60(95%CI 1.26,2.02);P = 0.0006),而非油炸P-MUFA则无关联。来自油炸植物性食品的MUFA摄入可能会增加中国人群的T2D风险。