Horn Elizabeth J, Dempsey George, Schotthoefer Anna M, Prisco U Lena, McArdle Matthew, Gervasi Stephanie S, Golightly Marc, De Luca Cathy, Evans Mel, Pritt Bobbi S, Theel Elitza S, Iyer Radha, Liveris Dionysios, Wang Guiqing, Goldstein Don, Schwartz Ira
Lyme Disease Biobank, Portland, Oregon, USA
East Hampton Family Medicine, East Hampton, New York, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 May 26;58(6). doi: 10.1128/JCM.00032-20.
Lyme disease (LD) is an increasing public health problem. Current laboratory testing is insensitive in early infection, the stage at which appropriate treatment is most effective in preventing disease sequelae. The Lyme Disease Biobank (LDB) collects samples from individuals with symptoms consistent with early LD presenting with or without erythema migrans (EM) or an annular, expanding skin lesion and uninfected individuals from areas of endemicity. Samples were collected from 550 participants (298 cases and 252 controls) according to institutional review board-approved protocols and shipped to a centralized biorepository. Testing was performed to confirm the presence of tick-borne pathogens by real-time PCR, and a subset of samples was tested for by culture. Serology was performed on all samples using the CDC's standard two-tiered testing algorithm (STTTA) for LD. LD diagnosis was supported by laboratory testing in 82 cases, including positive results by use of the STTTA, PCR, or culture or positive results by two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays for cases presenting with EM lesion sizes of >5 cm. The remaining 216 cases had negative laboratory testing results. For the controls, 43 were positive by at least one of the tiers and 6 were positive by use of the STTTA. The results obtained with this collection highlight and reinforce the known limitations of serologic testing in early LD, with only 29% of individuals presenting with EM lesion sizes of >5 cm yielding a positive result using the STTTA. Aliquots of whole blood, serum, and urine from clinically characterized patients with and without LD are available to investigators in academia and industry for evaluation or development of novel diagnostic assays for LD, to continue to improve upon currently available methods.
莱姆病(LD)是一个日益严重的公共卫生问题。目前的实验室检测在早期感染阶段不够灵敏,而这一阶段是适当治疗预防疾病后遗症最有效的时期。莱姆病生物样本库(LDB)从有与早期莱姆病相符症状的个体中收集样本,这些个体有或没有游走性红斑(EM)或环形、不断扩大的皮肤损害,同时也从疾病流行地区的未感染个体中收集样本。根据机构审查委员会批准的方案,从550名参与者(298例病例和252名对照)中采集样本,并运往一个集中的生物样本库。通过实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测以确认蜱传病原体的存在,并对一部分样本进行培养检测。对所有样本使用美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的莱姆病标准两层检测算法(STTTA)进行血清学检测。82例病例通过实验室检测支持莱姆病诊断,包括使用STTTA、PCR或培养检测呈阳性结果,或对于有大于5厘米EM损害的病例通过两种酶联免疫吸附测定呈阳性结果。其余216例病例实验室检测结果为阴性。对于对照,43例至少在一层检测中呈阳性,6例通过STTTA检测呈阳性。此次样本收集所获得的结果突出并强化了早期莱姆病血清学检测已知的局限性,即对于有大于5厘米EM损害的个体,使用STTTA检测只有29%的个体呈阳性结果。来自有或没有莱姆病临床特征患者的全血、血清和尿液等分试样可供学术界和工业界的研究人员用于评估或开发莱姆病新型诊断检测方法,以持续改进现有方法。