Suppr超能文献

患者报告体验测量的心理计量学评估:它有效吗?

Psychometric evaluation of patient-reported experience measures: is it valid?

机构信息

Picker Institute Europe, Buxton Court, 3 West Way, Oxford OX2 0JB, UK.

NIVEL, Otterstraat 118, 3513 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2020 May 20;32(3):219-220. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa006.

Abstract

Multiple published studies and reviews have advocated the application of psychometric methods to the validation of patient experience measurement. Some such methods depend on measurement assumptions that may not be appropriate for patient experience. Rather than being the default approach for the validation of patient experience measurement, we argue that psychometric methods should be reviewed critically to determine their fit to the measurement application, and alternative approaches explored, so that the most appropriate validation methods can be identified.

摘要

许多已发表的研究和综述都提倡将心理计量学方法应用于患者体验测量的验证。其中一些方法依赖于可能不适用于患者体验的测量假设。我们认为,心理计量学方法不应作为患者体验测量验证的默认方法,而应进行批判性审查,以确定其是否适用于测量应用,并探索替代方法,从而确定最合适的验证方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验