de Brito Robalo Bruno M, Vlegels Naomi, Meier Jil, Leemans Alexander, Biessels Geert Jan, Reijmer Yael D
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
PROVIDI Lab, Image Sciences Institute, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Brain Connect. 2020 Apr;10(3):121-133. doi: 10.1089/brain.2019.0686. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
A popular solution to control for edge density variability in structural brain network analysis is to threshold the networks to a fixed density across all subjects. However, it remains unclear how this type of thresholding affects the basic network architecture in terms of edge weights, hub location, and hub connectivity and, especially, how it affects the sensitivity to detect disease-related abnormalities. We investigated these two questions in a cohort of patients with cerebral small vessel disease and age-matched controls. Brain networks were reconstructed from diffusion magnetic resonance imaging data using deterministic fiber tractography. Networks were thresholded to a fixed density by removing edges with the lowest number of streamlines. We compared edge length (mm), fractional anisotropy (FA), proportion of hub connections, and hub location between the unthresholded and the thresholded networks of each subject. Moreover, we compared weighted graph measures of global and local connectivity obtained from the (un)thresholded networks between patients and controls. We performed these analyses over a range of densities (2-20%). Results indicate that fixed-density thresholding disproportionally removes edges composed of long streamlines, but is independent of FA. The edges removed were not preferentially connected to hub or nonhub nodes. Over half of the original hubs were reproducible when networks were thresholded to a density ≥10%. Furthermore, the between-group differences in graph measures observed in the unthresholded network remained present after thresholding, irrespective of the chosen density. We therefore conclude that moderate fixed-density thresholds can successfully be applied to control for the effects of density in structural brain network analysis.
在脑结构网络分析中,一种常用的控制边缘密度变异性的方法是将所有受试者的网络阈值设定为固定密度。然而,目前尚不清楚这种阈值设定如何影响边缘权重、枢纽位置和枢纽连通性方面的基本网络架构,尤其是它如何影响检测疾病相关异常的敏感性。我们在一组脑小血管疾病患者和年龄匹配的对照组中研究了这两个问题。使用确定性纤维束成像从扩散磁共振成像数据重建脑网络。通过去除流线数量最少的边缘将网络阈值设定为固定密度。我们比较了每个受试者未阈值化和阈值化网络之间的边缘长度(毫米)、分数各向异性(FA)、枢纽连接比例和枢纽位置。此外,我们比较了患者和对照组之间从未阈值化和阈值化网络获得的全局和局部连通性的加权图测量值。我们在一系列密度(2 - 20%)上进行了这些分析。结果表明,固定密度阈值设定不成比例地去除了由长流线组成的边缘,但与FA无关。被去除的边缘并非优先连接到枢纽或非枢纽节点。当网络阈值设定为≥10%的密度时,超过一半的原始枢纽是可重现的。此外,无论选择何种密度,在阈值化后,未阈值化网络中观察到的组间图测量差异仍然存在。因此,我们得出结论,适度的固定密度阈值可以成功应用于控制脑结构网络分析中密度的影响。