Suppr超能文献

非典型抗精神病药物作为辅助治疗对重度抑郁症患者精神科费用及使用情况的影响

Impact of Atypical Antipsychotics as Adjunctive Therapy on Psychiatric Cost and Utilization in Patients with Major Depressive Disorder.

作者信息

Yan Tingjian, Greene Mallik, Chang Eunice, Houle Christy R, Tarbox Marian H, Broder Michael S

机构信息

Partnership for Health Analytic Research, LLC, Beverly Hills, CA 90212, USA.

Otsuka Pharmaceutical Development & Commercialization, Inc, Princeton, NJ, 08540, USA.

出版信息

Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2020 Feb 7;12:81-89. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S231824. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) incur high costs, despite established treatment options. Adding an atypical antipsychotic (AAP) to antidepressant therapy has shown to reduce depressive symptoms in MDD, but it remains unclear with which adjunctive AAP to initiate. As economic burden is one factor that can influence treatment selection, this study's objective was to evaluate the impact of adjunctive AAP choice on psychiatric costs and healthcare utilization in MDD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study analyzed de-identified data from: (1) IBM MarketScan Commercial (C), Medicare Supplemental (MS), and MarketScan Multi-State Medicaid (M) Databases, and (2) Optum Clinformatics Datamart. Adult MDD patients were included if they had: initiated adjunctive AAPs during study identification period (7/1/15-9/30/16 MarketScan C/MS, and Optum; 7/1/15-6/30/16 MarketScan M), and ≥12 months of continuous enrollment before (baseline) and after (follow-up) first treatment date. Models included generalized linear models (GLMs) for psychiatric costs (total inpatient and outpatient services, excluding outpatient pharmacy costs), and a two-part model (logistic regression for psychiatric hospitalizations, GLM for psychiatric hospitalization costs among hospitalized patients); models were adjusted for baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

The final study sample consisted of 10,325 patients (7657 aripiprazole, 1219 brexpiprazole, 827 lurasidone, 622 quetiapine). Using brexpiprazole as reference, lurasidone and quetiapine users had $1662 and $3894 higher psychiatric costs, respectively. Psychiatric costs were not statistically significantly different between aripiprazole and brexpiprazole (p>0.05). Quetiapine users had $15,159 (p<0.001) higher psychiatric hospitalization costs among those hospitalized, and higher odds of psychiatric hospitalization [2.11 (1.46-3.04); p<0.001] compared to brexpiprazole users. No statistically significant differences observed in psychiatric hospitalization risk comparing aripiprazole and lurasidone with brexpiprazole (p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

In MDD, brexpiprazole users had significantly lower psychiatric costs than lurasidone and quetiapine users, and significantly lower psychiatric hospitalization risk than quetiapine users. Adjunctive AAP choice may impact subsequent healthcare costs and utilization in MDD.

摘要

引言

尽管有既定的治疗方案,但重度抑郁症(MDD)患者的治疗成本依然很高。在抗抑郁治疗中添加非典型抗精神病药物(AAP)已显示可减轻MDD患者的抑郁症状,但尚不清楚应首先使用哪种辅助性AAP。由于经济负担是影响治疗选择的一个因素,本研究的目的是评估辅助性AAP的选择对MDD患者精神科成本和医疗保健利用的影响。

材料与方法

这项回顾性队列研究分析了来自以下数据源的匿名数据:(1)IBM MarketScan商业数据库(C)、医疗保险补充数据库(MS)和MarketScan多州医疗补助数据库(M);(2)Optum临床信息数据库。纳入的成年MDD患者需满足以下条件:在研究识别期内(2015年7月1日至2016年9月30日,MarketScan C/MS和Optum;2015年7月1日至2016年6月30日,MarketScan M)开始使用辅助性AAP,并且在首次治疗日期之前(基线)和之后(随访)连续登记≥12个月。模型包括用于精神科成本(住院和门诊服务总计,不包括门诊药房成本)的广义线性模型(GLM),以及一个两部分模型(用于精神科住院的逻辑回归,用于住院患者精神科住院成本的GLM);模型针对基线特征进行了调整。

结果

最终研究样本包括10325名患者(7657名使用阿立哌唑,1219名使用布瑞哌唑,827名使用鲁拉西酮,622名使用喹硫平)。以布瑞哌唑作为对照,使用鲁拉西酮和喹硫平的患者精神科成本分别高出1662美元和3894美元。阿立哌唑和布瑞哌唑之间的精神科成本在统计学上无显著差异(p>0.05)。使用喹硫平的患者在住院患者中的精神科住院成本高出15159美元(p<0.001),且与使用布瑞哌唑的患者相比,精神科住院几率更高[2.11(1.46 - 3.04);p<0.001]。与布瑞哌唑相比,阿立哌唑和鲁拉西酮在精神科住院风险方面未观察到统计学上的显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

在MDD患者中,使用布瑞哌唑的患者精神科成本显著低于使用鲁拉西酮和喹硫平的患者,且精神科住院风险显著低于使用喹硫平的患者。辅助性AAP的选择可能会影响MDD患者后续的医疗成本和利用情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/025f/7012250/1222713785d8/CEOR-12-81-g0001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验