Owaidah Amani Y, Naffaa Noor M, Alumran Arwa, Alzahrani Faisal
Department of Clinical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
Department of Health Information Management and Technology, College of Public Health, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.
J Blood Med. 2020 Feb 13;11:59-65. doi: 10.2147/JBM.S236834. eCollection 2020.
The understanding of blood group phenotypes in Saudi Arabia is limited to the ABO and Rh blood groups. Data for the other major blood group phenotypes in different populations have been widely studied and used as a reference for identifying antigen-negative blood in hospital blood banks. Such information is crucial for facilitating the challenging task of providing antigen-negative blood for patients with multiple antibodies.
The aim of this study was to determine the frequency of the major blood group phenotypes in the Eastern region of Saudi Arabia and compare them to phenotypes in other populations.
A total of 100 volunteer Saudi donors were included in this study. Red blood cells from the donors were subjected to antigen typing of the major blood group systems (Rh, Kell, Kidd, Duffy, MNS, Lewis, Lutheran, and P) using the gel microtube technique.
From the Rh blood group system, the e antigen was found in 97% of donors, followed by c at 86%. The Cellano (k) antigen of the Kell system was found in all donors, whereas the Kell (K) antigen was only found in 8 % of donors. The K+k- phenotype was not detected in our study. Unexpectedly, for the Duffy blood group system, the null phenotype Fy(a-b-) was found in 61% of donors. In the MNS blood group system, M+N-S+s+ was the most common phenotype at 24%.
The frequency of blood group phenotypes in the Eastern region of Saudi Arabia differs from that in other populations because of the diverse ethnic backgrounds of those living in that region. The findings of this study can be used to establish a local donor registry to help provide antigen-negative blood for patients with unexpected antibodies or to create an in-house antibody identification panel to add to the commercial panel that would be useful for confirming antibody identification results.
沙特阿拉伯对血型表型的了解仅限于ABO和Rh血型。不同人群中其他主要血型表型的数据已得到广泛研究,并被用作医院血库中鉴定抗原阴性血液的参考。此类信息对于为具有多种抗体的患者提供抗原阴性血液这一具有挑战性的任务至关重要。
本研究的目的是确定沙特阿拉伯东部地区主要血型表型的频率,并将其与其他人群的表型进行比较。
本研究共纳入100名沙特志愿者献血者。使用凝胶微管技术对献血者的红细胞进行主要血型系统(Rh、Kell、Kidd、Duffy、MNS、Lewis、Lutheran和P)的抗原分型。
在Rh血型系统中,97%的献血者检测到e抗原,其次是c抗原,检出率为86%。Kell系统的Cellano(k)抗原在所有献血者中均有发现,而Kell(K)抗原仅在8%的献血者中发现。本研究未检测到K+k-表型。出乎意料的是,在Duffy血型系统中,61%的献血者为Fy(a-b-)无效表型。在MNS血型系统中,M+N-S+s+是最常见的表型,占24%。
由于沙特阿拉伯东部地区居民的种族背景多样,该地区血型表型的频率与其他人群不同。本研究结果可用于建立当地献血者登记册,以帮助为具有意外抗体的患者提供抗原阴性血液,或创建内部抗体鉴定面板,以补充商业面板,这将有助于确认抗体鉴定结果。