Yang Zhilin, Li Shoulin, Zeng Hongwu, Yin Jianchun, Xu Wanhua, Li Jiaqiang, Xie Jinjin, Liu Cundong
Department of Urology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, P.R. China.
Department of Urology and Laboratory of Pelvic Floor Muscle Function, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, P.R. China.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Apr;30(4):453-457. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0607. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
Can laparoscopic orchiopexy achieve a better testicular position and a higher success rate than open orchiopexy for palpable undescended testis in children? We conducted a prospective comparison study with a large volume of cases to answer this question. A total of 256 patients with palpable undescended testis who were admitted between January 1, 2017 and December 31, 2017 were included in this study. Among them, 124 patients underwent laparoscopic orchiopexy and 132 patients underwent open inguinal orchiopexy. The outcome evaluated index included final testicular position, success rate, and complications. Of 256 patients, the mean age was 2.4 years; 218 patients had unilateral palpable testis, and the other 38 patients had bilateral palpable testis. There were no significant differences between laparoscopic orchiopexy group and open orchiopexy group with respect to age, side, preoperative testicular position, and testicular volume. The final testicular position in laparoscopic group was better than that in open group (lower position rate: 89.3% versus 77.9%, = .01). There was no significant difference in success rate (laparoscopic group: 100%; and open group: 98.5%). There were 3 complications in the laparoscopic group and 6 complications in open group ( > .05). No testicular atrophy was found in either group. No testicular ascent occurred in laparoscopic group while there were 2 cases in open group, which required additional surgery for correction. Of patients who underwent surgery at the age of 3 years or older ( = 75), laparoscopic surgery was associated with markedly better testicular position than open surgery (lower position rate: 88.1% versus 69.6%, = .03). Laparoscopic orchiopexy is associated with better testicular position and comparable success rate comparing to open orchiopexy for palpable undescended testis in children. This procedure could be recommended for palpable undescended testis, especially in older children.
对于儿童可触及的隐睾,腹腔镜睾丸固定术在实现更好的睾丸位置和更高的成功率方面是否优于开放睾丸固定术?我们进行了一项大量病例的前瞻性比较研究来回答这个问题。本研究纳入了2017年1月1日至2017年12月31日期间收治的256例可触及隐睾的患者。其中,124例患者接受了腹腔镜睾丸固定术,132例患者接受了开放腹股沟睾丸固定术。评估的结果指标包括最终睾丸位置、成功率和并发症。256例患者的平均年龄为2.4岁;218例患者为单侧可触及睾丸,另外38例患者为双侧可触及睾丸。腹腔镜睾丸固定术组和开放睾丸固定术组在年龄、患侧、术前睾丸位置和睾丸体积方面无显著差异。腹腔镜组的最终睾丸位置优于开放组(低位率:89.3%对77.9%,P = 0.01)。成功率无显著差异(腹腔镜组:100%;开放组:98.5%)。腹腔镜组有3例并发症,开放组有6例并发症(P>0.05)。两组均未发现睾丸萎缩。腹腔镜组未发生睾丸上移,而开放组有2例,需要额外手术矫正。在3岁及以上接受手术的患者中(n = 75),腹腔镜手术的睾丸位置明显优于开放手术(低位率:88.1%对69.6%,P = 0.03)。对于儿童可触及的隐睾,与开放睾丸固定术相比,腹腔镜睾丸固定术可使睾丸位置更好,成功率相当。该手术可推荐用于可触及的隐睾,尤其是年龄较大的儿童。