• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临时胆道支架置入后行第二次内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)治疗困难性胆总管结石完全清除的相关因素:一项多中心、回顾性队列研究

Factors associated with complete clearance of difficult common bile duct stones after temporary biliary stenting followed by a second ERCP: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study.

作者信息

Jang Dong Kee, Lee Sang Hyub, Ahn Dong Won, Paik Woo Hyun, Lee Jae Min, Lee Jun Kyu, Ryu Ji Kon, Kim Yong-Tae

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Dongguk University Ilsan Hospital, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea.

Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Endoscopy. 2020 Jun;52(6):462-468. doi: 10.1055/a-1117-3393. Epub 2020 Feb 27.

DOI:10.1055/a-1117-3393
PMID:32106322
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although temporary endoscopic biliary stenting is considered effective for difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones, few studies have investigated the optimal conditions for complete stone clearance at the second endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) after temporary biliary stenting. We aimed to evaluate factors associated with complete clearance.

METHODS

Patients with difficult CBD stones (a large [≥ 20 mm] or multiple [≥ 3 sized ≥ 15 mm] CBD stones) were retrospectively enrolled from three institutions. Patients who underwent temporary biliary stenting at the first ERCP were analyzed. Double-pigtail plastic stents (7 or 10 Fr) were placed with the proximal ends above the stones. Complete clearance rate and stone size reduction at the second ERCP, and factors associated with complete clearance were evaluated using univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

85 patients were enrolled (mean age 74.5 years [SD 11.3]; 47 women). Stone size and CBD diameter significantly decreased during the interval. The overall complete stone clearance rate was 64.7 % (55/85) at the second ERCP. The mean stone size reduction was 5.6 mm (SD 6.8). In multivariate analysis, complete clearance rate was significantly lower in male patients, in patients aged > 80 years, and in stones > 25 mm initially, but was significantly higher when 7-Fr stents were placed and stone size was reduced by > 5 mm.

CONCLUSION

Use of 7-Fr rather than 10-Fr plastic stents was beneficial for complete clearance of difficult CBD stones after temporary biliary stenting; older male patients as well as patients with initial stones > 25 mm had a lower clearance rate.

摘要

背景

尽管临时内镜下胆道支架置入术被认为对困难性胆总管结石有效,但很少有研究探讨在临时胆道支架置入术后第二次内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)时实现结石完全清除的最佳条件。我们旨在评估与完全清除相关的因素。

方法

从三个机构回顾性纳入患有困难性胆总管结石(大结石[≥20mm]或多发结石[≥3枚,大小≥15mm])的患者。对在首次ERCP时接受临时胆道支架置入术的患者进行分析。放置双猪尾塑料支架(7或10Fr),近端置于结石上方。使用单因素和多因素分析评估第二次ERCP时的完全清除率、结石尺寸减小情况以及与完全清除相关的因素。

结果

共纳入85例患者(平均年龄74.5岁[标准差11.3];47例女性)。在此期间结石大小和胆总管直径显著减小。第二次ERCP时总的结石完全清除率为64.7%(55/85)。结石平均尺寸减小5.6mm(标准差6.8)。在多因素分析中,男性患者、年龄>80岁的患者以及最初结石>25mm的患者完全清除率显著较低,但放置7Fr支架且结石尺寸减小>5mm时完全清除率显著较高。

结论

使用7Fr而非10Fr塑料支架有利于临时胆道支架置入术后困难性胆总管结石的完全清除;老年男性患者以及最初结石>25mm的患者清除率较低。

相似文献

1
Factors associated with complete clearance of difficult common bile duct stones after temporary biliary stenting followed by a second ERCP: a multicenter, retrospective, cohort study.临时胆道支架置入后行第二次内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)治疗困难性胆总管结石完全清除的相关因素:一项多中心、回顾性队列研究
Endoscopy. 2020 Jun;52(6):462-468. doi: 10.1055/a-1117-3393. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
2
Effect of biliary stenting combined with ursodeoxycholic acid and terpene treatment on retained common bile duct stones in elderly patients: a multicenter study.胆道支架置入联合熊去氧胆酸和萜类治疗对老年患者胆总管残留结石的影响:一项多中心研究
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Oct;104(10):2418-21. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.303. Epub 2009 Jun 30.
3
Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoprostheses in the treatment of large or multiple common bile duct stones.内镜下括约肌切开术加支架置入术治疗大或多发胆总管结石。
Dig Endosc. 2011 Jul;23(3):240-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1443-1661.2010.01100.x. Epub 2011 Feb 9.
4
Is the addition of choleretic agents in multiple double-pigtail biliary stents effective for difficult common bile duct stones in elderly patients? A prospective, multicenter study.在多发性双猪尾胆管支架中添加利胆剂对老年患者的困难性胆总管结石是否有效?一项前瞻性、多中心研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.03.005. Epub 2011 Apr 30.
5
Effectiveness and safety of biliary stenting in the management of difficult common bile duct stones in elderly patients.胆管支架置入术治疗老年患者复杂胆总管结石的有效性和安全性
Turk J Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;27(1):30-6. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2015.150305. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
6
Biliary stenting in difficult common bile duct stones: a single tertiary center experience.胆管支架置入术治疗困难的胆总管结石:单中心经验。
Turk J Med Sci. 2016 Dec 20;46(6):1779-1785. doi: 10.3906/sag-1602-149.
7
Effect of stent placement on stone recurrence and post-procedural cholangitis after endoscopic removal of common bile duct stones.支架置入对胆总管结石内镜取石术后结石复发和术后胆管炎的影响。
Korean J Intern Med. 2021 Mar;36(Suppl 1):S27-S34. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2020.060. Epub 2020 Aug 24.
8
Do not rush for surgery; stent placement may be an effective step for definitive treatment of initially unextractable common bile duct stones with ERCP.不要急于进行手术;对于最初无法取出的胆总管结石,内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)下放置支架可能是确定性治疗的有效步骤。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1473-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4355-y. Epub 2015 Jun 27.
9
PREDICTORS OF FAILURE OF ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY IN CLEARING BILE DUCT STONES DURING INDEX PROCEDURE - A PROSPECTIVE STUDY.经内镜逆行胰胆管造影术清除胆管结石术中失败的预测因素——一项前瞻性研究。
Arq Gastroenterol. 2024 Mar 4;61:e23112. doi: 10.1590/S0004-2803.24612023-112. eCollection 2024.
10
The effect of indwelling endoprosthesis on stone size or fragmentation after long-term treatment with biliary stenting for large stones.长期使用胆道支架治疗大结石后,留置内假体对结石大小或碎裂的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2003 Oct;17(10):1552-5. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-9240-9. Epub 2003 Aug 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Recommendations for the Clinical Practice concerning the Use of Cholangiopancreatoscopy: Proceedings from a Consensus Meeting.关于胆管胰管镜检查临床应用的临床实践建议:共识会议纪要
GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2025 Apr 8:1-21. doi: 10.1159/000545718.
2
Difficult Biliary Stones: A Comprehensive Review of New and Old Lithotripsy Techniques.《难处理的胆管结石:新老碎石技术的全面综述》
Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Jan 13;58(1):120. doi: 10.3390/medicina58010120.
3
Is the use of fully covered metal stents effective in the treatment of difficult lithiasis of the common bile duct?
完全覆膜金属支架治疗胆总管困难结石的效果如何?
Surg Endosc. 2022 Aug;36(8):5684-5691. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08919-8. Epub 2022 Jan 7.
4
Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones: Where are we now? A comprehensive review.内镜治疗困难胆总管结石:我们现在在哪里?全面综述。
World J Gastroenterol. 2021 Nov 28;27(44):7597-7611. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i44.7597.
5
Cracking Difficult Biliary Stones.破解复杂胆管结石
Clin Endosc. 2021 Sep;54(5):660-668. doi: 10.5946/ce.2020.256-IDEN. Epub 2021 Mar 16.