• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于诊所的2型糖尿病管理随机对照干预的有效性:中国大陆强化糖尿病管理的创新模式(C-IDM研究)

Effectiveness of a clinic-based randomized controlled intervention for type 2 diabetes management: an innovative model of intensified diabetes management in Mainland China (C-IDM study).

作者信息

Lou Qinglin, Ye Qing, Wu Haidi, Wang Zhiyong, Ware Robert S, Xiong Yaqing, Xu Fei

机构信息

Geriatric Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.

Non-Communicable Disease Prevention and Control, Nanjing Municipal Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Nanjing, China.

出版信息

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001030.

DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001030
PMID:32107265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7206907/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Highly efficient diabetes management programs are needed for tackling diabetes in China. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of a clinic-based intensified diabetes management model (C-IDM) in Mainland China.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A 2-year clinic-based randomized controlled trial was conducted among patients with type 2 diabetes in Nanjing, China. The C-IDM intervention components comprised four domains (disease targeting management, express referral channel, expert visit, patients' self-management) and an integrated running system (disease control centers, general hospitals and local clinics). Control group participants received their usual care, while intervention participants received both the C-IDM package and the usual services. The primary outcome variable was change of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c). Mixed-effects models were used to compute effect estimates and 95% CI with consideration of both individual and cluster-level confounders.

RESULTS

Overall, 1095 of 1143 participants were assessed at study completion. The mean change in HbA1c was significantly greater in the intervention group than in the control group (mean difference (MD)=-0.57, 95% CI -0.79 to -0.36). Similar results were observed for change in body mass index (MD=-0.29, 95% CI -0.49 to -0.10). Participants in the intervention group were more likely to achieve normal HbA1c and body weight compared with their counterparts in control group after adjusting for potentially confounding variables (adjusted OR=1.94, 95% CI 1.35 to 2.81 and 1.79, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.85, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

The C-IDM model is feasible and effective in large-scale management of patients with type 2 diabetes in China. It has public health implications for tackling the burden of diabetes in China.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR-IOR-15006019.

摘要

目的

在中国应对糖尿病需要高效的糖尿病管理项目。本研究旨在评估中国大陆一种基于门诊的强化糖尿病管理模式(C-IDM)的有效性。

研究设计与方法

在中国南京对2型糖尿病患者进行了一项为期2年的基于门诊的随机对照试验。C-IDM干预组件包括四个领域(疾病靶向管理、快速转诊渠道、专家会诊、患者自我管理)和一个综合运行系统(疾病控制中心、综合医院和当地诊所)。对照组参与者接受常规护理,而干预组参与者同时接受C-IDM套餐和常规服务。主要结局变量是糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)的变化。使用混合效应模型计算效应估计值和95%置信区间,同时考虑个体和群组层面的混杂因素。

结果

总体而言,1143名参与者中有1095名在研究结束时接受了评估。干预组HbA1c的平均变化显著大于对照组(平均差值(MD)=-0.57,95%置信区间为-0.79至-0.36)。体重指数变化也观察到类似结果(MD=-0.29,95%置信区间为-0.49至-0.10)。在调整潜在混杂变量后,干预组参与者比对照组参与者更有可能实现HbA1c正常化和体重正常化(调整后的比值比分别为1.94,95%置信区间为1.35至2.81;1.79,95%置信区间为1.13至2.85)。

结论

C-IDM模式在中国对2型糖尿病患者的大规模管理中是可行且有效的。它对减轻中国糖尿病负担具有公共卫生意义。

试验注册号

ChiCTR-IOR-15006019。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/505f/7206907/9f9238fa15c8/bmjdrc-2019-001030f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/505f/7206907/2ed4d608200f/bmjdrc-2019-001030f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/505f/7206907/9f9238fa15c8/bmjdrc-2019-001030f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/505f/7206907/2ed4d608200f/bmjdrc-2019-001030f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/505f/7206907/9f9238fa15c8/bmjdrc-2019-001030f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Effectiveness of a clinic-based randomized controlled intervention for type 2 diabetes management: an innovative model of intensified diabetes management in Mainland China (C-IDM study).基于诊所的2型糖尿病管理随机对照干预的有效性:中国大陆强化糖尿病管理的创新模式(C-IDM研究)
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-001030.
2
Managing with Learning Disability and Diabetes: OK-Diabetes - a case-finding study and feasibility randomised controlled trial.管理学习障碍和糖尿病:OK-Diabetes-一项病例发现研究和可行性随机对照试验。
Health Technol Assess. 2018 May;22(26):1-328. doi: 10.3310/hta22260.
3
Evaluation of an mHealth-enabled hierarchical diabetes management intervention in primary care in China (ROADMAP): A cluster randomized trial.评估移动医疗支持的中国基层医疗中分级糖尿病管理干预(ROADMAP):一项群组随机试验。
PLoS Med. 2021 Sep 21;18(9):e1003754. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003754. eCollection 2021 Sep.
4
Effects of lifestyle education program for type 2 diabetes patients in clinics: a cluster randomized controlled trial.诊所中 2 型糖尿病患者生活方式教育计划的效果:一项整群随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2013 May 14;13:467. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-467.
5
Mobile App for Improved Self-Management of Type 2 Diabetes: Multicenter Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial.移动应用程序改善 2 型糖尿病的自我管理:多中心实用随机对照试验。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jan 10;7(1):e10321. doi: 10.2196/10321.
6
Management of type 2 diabetes in China: the Happy Life Club, a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial using health coaches.中国2型糖尿病的管理:幸福生活俱乐部,一项使用健康教练的实用整群随机对照试验
BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 4;6(3):e009319. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009319.
7
Comparative Effectiveness and Maintenance of Diabetes Self-Management Education Interventions for Marshallese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.比较 2 型糖尿病马绍尔群岛患者的糖尿病自我管理教育干预措施的有效性和维持情况:一项随机对照试验。
Diabetes Care. 2019 May;42(5):849-858. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1985. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
8
Effectiveness of the EMPOWER-PAR Intervention in Improving Clinical Outcomes of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Primary Care: A Pragmatic Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial.EMPOWER-PAR干预措施对改善基层医疗中2型糖尿病临床结局的有效性:一项实用性整群随机对照试验
BMC Fam Pract. 2016 Nov 14;17(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0557-1.
9
Effectiveness of a Family-based Diabetes Self-management Educational Intervention for Chinese Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in Wuhan, China.基于家庭的糖尿病自我管理教育干预对中国武汉成年2型糖尿病患者的有效性
Diabetes Educ. 2016 Dec;42(6):697-711. doi: 10.1177/0145721716674325.
10
The impact of an intervention to increase uptake to structured self-management education for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus in primary care (the embedding package), compared to usual care, on glycaemic control: study protocol for a mixed methods study incorporating a wait-list cluster randomised controlled trial.一项旨在提高 2 型糖尿病患者在基层医疗中接受结构化自我管理教育的干预措施(嵌入方案)的影响,与常规护理相比,对血糖控制的影响:一项混合方法研究的研究方案,包括等待名单聚类随机对照试验。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Nov 7;20(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-1038-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate the impact of shared medical appointments for diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.运用RE-AIM框架评估共享医疗预约对糖尿病的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
BMC Prim Care. 2025 Jun 5;26(1):192. doi: 10.1186/s12875-025-02875-1.
2
Can integrated care interventions strengthen primary care and improve outcomes for patients with chronic diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis.综合护理干预能否加强初级保健并改善慢性病患者的治疗效果?一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Jan 6;23(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01260-1.
3
The effectiveness of diabetes self-management education intervention on glycaemic control and cardiometabolic risk in adults with type 2 diabetes in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Joint associations of dietary pattern and television viewing with CVD risk factors among urban men and women in China: a cross-sectional study.中国城市男性和女性膳食模式与看电视时间与 CVD 风险因素的联合关联:一项横断面研究。
Br J Nutr. 2018 Jan;119(1):74-82. doi: 10.1017/S0007114517003075. Epub 2017 Dec 11.
2
Prevalence and Ethnic Pattern of Diabetes and Prediabetes in China in 2013.2013年中国糖尿病及糖尿病前期的患病率与民族分布特征
JAMA. 2017 Jun 27;317(24):2515-2523. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7596.
3
Economic Burden in Chinese Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Using Electronic Insurance Claims Data.
在中低收入国家,2 型糖尿病成人的糖尿病自我管理教育干预对血糖控制和心血管代谢风险的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2024 Feb 2;19(2):e0297328. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297328. eCollection 2024.
4
Quality improvement strategies for diabetes care: Effects on outcomes for adults living with diabetes.糖尿病护理质量改进策略:对成年糖尿病患者结局的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 31;5(5):CD014513. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014513.
5
Impact of Nurse-Led Titration Versus Physician Prescription of Hypoglycaemic Agents on HbA1c Level in Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.护士主导的降糖药物滴定与医生处方对2型糖尿病患者糖化血红蛋白水平的影响:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2021 Dec 15;13(12):e20436. doi: 10.7759/cureus.20436. eCollection 2021 Dec.
利用电子保险理赔数据评估中国糖尿病患者的经济负担
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 29;11(8):e0159297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159297. eCollection 2016.
4
Standards of care for type 2 diabetes in China.中国2型糖尿病的护理标准。
Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2016 Jul;32(5):442-58. doi: 10.1002/dmrr.2827.
5
The role of patient education in the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes: an overview.患者教育在2型糖尿病预防和管理中的作用:综述
Endocrine. 2016 Jul;53(1):18-27. doi: 10.1007/s12020-015-0775-7. Epub 2015 Oct 22.
6
Peer Support for Diabetes Management in Primary Care and Community Settings in Anhui Province, China.中国安徽省基层医疗和社区环境中糖尿病管理的同伴支持
Ann Fam Med. 2015 Aug;13 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S50-8. doi: 10.1370/afm.1799.
7
The Effect of a Community-Based Self-Help Intervention: Korean Americans With Type 2 Diabetes.一项基于社区的自助干预措施的效果:患有2型糖尿病的韩裔美国人
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Nov;49(5):726-737. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.04.033. Epub 2015 Jul 14.
8
The chronic care model and diabetes management in US primary care settings: a systematic review.美国初级保健环境中的慢性病管理模式与糖尿病管理:系统评价。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013;10:E26. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120180.
9
Nurse-community health worker team improves diabetes care in American Samoa: results of a randomized controlled trial.护士-社区卫生工作者团队改善了美属萨摩亚的糖尿病护理:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Jul;36(7):1947-53. doi: 10.2337/dc12-1969. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
10
Twenty-first century behavioral medicine: a context for empowering clinicians and patients with diabetes: a consensus report.21世纪行为医学:增强糖尿病临床医生和患者能力的背景:一份共识报告。
Diabetes Care. 2013 Feb;36(2):463-70. doi: 10.2337/dc12-2305.